vinifera

mmm nice article, thanks for link well i'm on android 4.3, butreading that article, i'm doing good haha ad-away + afwall + greenify and removed few services from os base install makes things good even on web they have my wrong location, as they can't pin point me BUT let me ask another question, again security wise having Flash installed on winblows is a medium security risk but what about rooted Android phone ? I have Flash 11.1 (it was last one to be made) installed, naturally blocked by firewall but do android "files" can exploit it via flash like on win32 or not ?

err no

yep, i'm not asking for warez, nor serials nor cracks but just installer or ISO as it were of NSW 2003 or preferably 2004 i searched every corner on net i could think of and... there was nothing not even archived

lol wait wait does that screenshot show how a pinned icon now acts like ex-notification bar ? and even worse spams adverts on its own ?

dont get too happy it says business wont get updates but consumers will and even if miracle happens and winblows 10 stops with all you'd get just another "windows" name, as next version

that defeats the purpose of browser

non NT are more-so safe until you put java on it and/or use IE too bad there's no x64 version of them

or find safe list and do it all again

avira gets my vote tho its UI is bit crappy but free version is fully functional (tho with annoying ads, which can be modified to be blocked) as far as program goes, it never let me down

aida64 ?

there are many defected updates 1 year ago when I did custom install for both x86 and x64, had to trace back alot of them, some are well listed and documented on MDL, and such have to be avoided at all cost and this is where research always come in handy BEFORE you slipstream things or do blindly auto update if sfc repair didn't fix it, then you're out of luck

i'm not tracking winblows 10 so much but seems it will get 3rd (turd :D) major upgrade soon ? anyone know will UI change in any aspect, or will uglyness still stay ?

by doing simple google of win7 error 800736CC you will find bunch of bunch of links not that hard eh ?

error message ?

0 as in ZERO they can name it whatever they want, its still same piece of s***

yeh, my fingers suck

no wonder they are all free

when talking about android, to me this is very grey area... I always thought, as per wikipedia, and per rooting my device as it looks, that "Android OS" is nothing more than Linux as core and I guess Java as shell ? but if its Linux at core, then how can it be prone to malwares that brick the system ? wouldn't it be just voulnerable to java part and just screw the UI and maybe gadget behaviour ? then comes the "antivirus" part on the online "markets", there are so many of them, even brand ones (avira, avast, sophos, norton, nod32....) and all are free, but, do they even work ? , some of what I have read on net, they don't do much, except scanning for "potential threats", but supposedly they don't detect trojans and such... ?

i'd call reactos more like obsolete project than dead if it was stable during vista days or even win7 days, that would be still ok but now ... its not worth it other than for "geeks" to i guess learn how OS works on code level ?

that wasn't port that was vista with 2k3 recompiled kernel you can see bunch of his "builds" just being server 03 with different kernel number stiffed with some vista beta files while he used true transparency and simmiliar emulating visuals nobody ever yet ported DWM to XP the closest was Stardock with winblinds 6 that actually used GPU for transparency and blur but that wasn't compositor, just their own com object for skinning shell every other imitation apps used brute CPU power which lagged the shizzle of the OS

nope fully dunctional DWM works with XP drivers on early vista versions it relies on .net 2 and DirectX 9 //samuka can't do nothing, he's using leaked WRK which is not x64 and uses butchered parts of alchi components and some reactOS ... things he never even managed to port DWM, all he does is some compatibility layer for vista apps to work on "XP"

that goes to web dev's any video dependant on *flv or any variant within swf will need flash but they are not necessary anymore, as flash videos are low quality anyway just compare youtube flash "HD" and html5 HD (h264) the HTML5 is so much crispier and sharper

mmm if XP was recompiled with proper x64 support with added DWM and win7's taskbar - I'd ditch any other NT in its favor

yes, losing compatibility support for previous system (apps for xp) yes, you'll get auto telemetry code embeded in VS '15 projects

the incompatibility will be solved when you do it "run as vista" via properties if it works on your current vista, it will work on 7 drivers should work from vista (even xp if i'm not mistaken) but usually you'll get generic ones, so again if it works on vista, it will work on 7 since you aim for 7 RTM, SP1 installation is a must unsupported ? win 7 will come to same phase very soon ... you ain't gonna miss anything, except garbage updates