All Activity

And now, disable Circular Kernel Context Logger and Audio logger. Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WMI\Autologger] "Status"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WMI\Autologger\Audio] "Start"=dword:00000000 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\WMI\Autologger\Circular Kernel Context Logger] "Start"=dword:00000000

Run WLU on stock Win2k before installing any extenders.

WMItracing.log OFF (Vista) Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WBEM\Tracing\WMI] "SessionEnabled"=dword:00000000 "Level"=dword:00000000

I can forgot about XP, better ask @AstroSkipper, the guy who knows everything! For Vista - Disable HDD Performance Counters Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\PerfDisk\Performance] "Disable Performance Counters"=dword:00000001

Folks, please use only English words (or say Dutch, German, French words, but only those that are currently/officially used in English) Like "grab" (Dutch word), for example. The ones that can be found in vocabularies!

ROFL

I'd even say @jumperlost two times already, because there's not such word. https://msfn.org/board/topic/102111-change-a-letter-game/?do=findComment&comment=1265939

Of course it has! And I'm closely watching the topic. @jumper, @EliraFriesnan, earlier @XPercenioland @NotHereToPlayGames - all lost one time.

so this game has NO RULES ???

To be fair, even if it's fixed now, I don't really care that much about having performance timers measuring stuff as I don't really look at them anyway, so the follow up question is gonna be: how do I get rid of them? You know, the less things I have in the background sucking up resources the better. I tried with CMD: DISKPERF -N but it says: Both Logical and Physical Disk Performance counters on this system are automatically enabled on demand. For legacy applications using IOCTL_DISK_PERFORMANCE to retrieve raw counters, you can use -Y or -N to forcibly enable or disable. No restart is required.

Got the same glitch on Vista, I simply disabled all performance timers and turned off the EventViewer.

EVERSPACE 2: Digital Deluxe Bundle v1.2.39726 Requires Windows 10+ On the other hand, the older build v1.0.34898, is still compatible with Windows 7!

In contrast to the first game, Senua’s Saga: Hellblade II v1.0 Requires Windows 10+ A big let down.

You probably misunderstand the problem. Software get the right mode (which it requested), but hardware output to monitor has different mode (resolution) because between software visible surface and hardware output locates the scaler. The question is how to eliminate it.

Today it changed "by itself" here. (the name changed after disabling and re-enabling the list): ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

C'mon now, there's no need to be a sour face. With so much literature all around, even if it's a repeat, at least it's an existing word.

"The #ungoogled-supermium flag enables all of ungoogled-chromium's core functionality (and a bit more, but the NTP is functioning as expected). Sync is also an expected casualty. Some unintended side effects will be split off into #ungoogled-supermium-aggressive in the next release." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/597#issuecomment-2121624072 Someone checked? Again, "The #ungoogled-supermium flag enables all of ungoogled-chromium's core functionality".

Please post if you aware of such projects, just to clarify, only real versions of these browsers are of interest. Thanks.

If you liked it, try Bates Motel TV show.

Thank you, good! Finally found it on streaming,

Chicago Fire 2012

This is all very confusing, so Supermium isn't really fully Ungoogled, even the switch applied?

MPC-HC claims it's a "format", while V_MPEG4 (H264) is a proper codec name, take a closer look at the posted screenshot above.

The irony is, the original idea behind Pale Moon, waaay back before XP even, at least as I understood it, was that it was supposed to just be Firefox optimized for Windows, so it was supposed to be (and seemed to be, on my ancient Win 98 PC) faster than vanilla Firefox. No new or different features, just better performance. This was like PM 3.6 or so, but it sure seems like they went astray somewhere along the line. And enabling AVX or whatever in 64-bit builds isn't going to make up for it. I tried disabling multiprocess mode on St 55 on Win 7 and had a similar experience. Couldn't even type a post on MSFN at 10-20 seconds per letter, with one CPU core maxed out! So, even with a single core, you might have had better luck with e10s forced on. It's my opinion that the OS version makes little difference in performance, assuming the application (browser or whatever) will run on both OSes. The app might be faster if optimized for a newer version, but in that case it's unlikely to run on the older version at all. It's mostly the hardware, rather than the OS, that provides good performance.

Our 26100.1 ISO came from a trusted U.S. source. It is a digital license, but we don't like to cheat (too much anyway).