All Activity
- Past hour
-
What for? It's obsolete, no matter how good it was 2 years ago. D.Draker no longer recommends this browser due to the age. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186346-i-moved-to-centbrowser-im-not-happy-about-it/page/5/#findComment-1275874
- 79 replies
-
- Browser
- Customised
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
- Today
-
arianagrande joined the community
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
they did this because they want jemalloc to be integrated into C runtime, which is un-recommended by MS later. -
At least the acronym (BSoD) will still be valid, since both black and blue begin with the letter 'b' c
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Nicholas McAnespy replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
If you can install Visual C++ 2008, it will produce Windows 2000 and XP compatible software (but with manifest errors affecting both Visual C++ 2005 and 2008). Mozilla got around that by building "mozcrt19.dll" somehow, but I have not been able to build it. Should I upload the source code and resulting executable? -
Okay, is there a modded version of this browser?
- 79 replies
-
- Browser
- Customised
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I think there is no much difference between vc2005 and vc2008? -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Nicholas McAnespy replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Yes I have, but my plan is actually to get New Moon 27 working with Windows 2000 (and XP/SP1), then create a Visual C++ 5.0 build of Firefox 3.0 (I have no idea how to make it work with Windows NT 3.50 or earlier, nor can I test it, but I'll eventually open the door to someone who can). I know I want Gecko 1.9, but I still struggle to figure out if I want the default theme of Firefox 1.5, 2.0, or 3.0. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Leokids123 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Hey Nicholas,have you heard Retrozilla 2.3 released updates? Are you gonna merge changes from retrozilla 2.3 to your fork? - Yesterday
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Nicholas McAnespy replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Can you see yourself ever using Visual C++ 2008 to produce Windows 2000 and XP RTM/SP1 compatible browsers, or do you need Visual C++ 2005 compatibility? I have a Visual C++ 2008/Windows 7 SDK compatible build of Firefox 35.0a1 I was thinking of uploading, but don't know if I should or not. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
kuja killer replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
ah great to know. i wouldnt have had any idea how to even know what was wrong, because it wouldnt ever show any information at all before the site would crash instantly, in the "Tools => Web Console" (or browswer console) window. Thats good you knew though. -
I finally managed to get Firefox 48.0.2 to work on Windows XP RTM! Notes kernelxp.dll stays in the "firefox" directories after patching, or else it will NOT work. The unofficial guide "How to get Firefox 48.0.2 / 45.9.x ESR to work on Windows XP RTM!" is now available. This guide is made by me. https://sites.google.com/view/clara-incorporated/modernization/windows-xp-rtm/firefox-48-0-2-firefox-45-9-x-esr
-
I think we have to take Shane's word for it that the patch has been applied to Supermium 132. As I said earlier, it's an ESR version, which surely should be capable of having the patch applied to it, as it should be fully supported until the next ESR version is released. I'm not sure how we can test whether the patch has been applied successfully or not.
-
Oh big thanks its that's all I needed, now the last problem is the right click that I indicated earlier. If you can solve this problem, your software will be perfect for me! ah and a big thank you for this software and your help! PS : for the color of right click i disable enhanced taskbar and re enable it, and its back to normal PS 2 : and now is back to black ahah
-
samowndewp joined the community
-
This is not a bug, but an improvement to indicate disabled window. There is/will be a setting to disable shading for confused ones [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\StartIsBack\DarkMagic] FadeDisabled = (DWORD)0 There are acrylic effects alright, but it's not supposed to be pure black, maybe extra tweaks on your system.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
raddy replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
https://yggtorrent.top - basilisk 52/55 can't pass cloudflare check, NM 28 crash on hcaptcha. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
roytam1 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
workarounded by relaxing check in DrawTargetCairo::IsValid(), and it seems not crashing for me now. https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commit/10b96192dd99bd7daef5072d51d7f739e01d2fbc -
Then it's a good idea to use the patched ungoogled for Server 2008 R2. No one knows and no one can guarantee how good and when the old 132 Supermium will (ever?) be patched for that serious vulnerability. https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Chromium-for-windows-7/releases/tag/ungoogled-chromium_138.0.7204.96 Edit/ They say it's been patched in R5. But in the article they say the patch is for 138+! Contradictory. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v132-r5
-
XP Pro X64 On Dell Optiplex 9020?
Karla Sleutel replied to FRnk776's topic in Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
His post is neither useless, nor senseless. Learn to look for before you write your senseless posts It's been confirmed by reputable members of MSFN that those don't work. "This didn't work for me." https://msfn.org/board/topic/186420-mod-for-intel-haswell-4600-hd-graphics-drivers-for-xp/#findComment-1271208 "Edit: After a while (5-8hours) if the PC is not used, the mouse works but I can't open anything that was minimized in the taskbar. I have to restart the PC to get it working again. Did you see this kind of behaviour? I'm using 32bit XP." https://msfn.org/board/topic/186420-mod-for-intel-haswell-4600-hd-graphics-drivers-for-xp/#findComment-1271490 -
Hi, please do you fix this? This does not appear without your app + no transparency or fluent effect on right clic menu in icon pined on taskbar? Its normal?
-
Eh, everything is described in this forum - learn to look for before you write senseless posts https://msfn.org/board/topic/183956-asus-b85m-e-with-core-i5-4590-code-10-in-device-manager/ https://msfn.org/board/topic/176356-simple-xp-32bit-64gb-ram-true-pae-guide/page/10/#findComment-1280987
-
WinXP SP2 64-bit on Asus J1800I-C BayTrail
reboot12 replied to reboot12's topic in Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
Normally the same as in the PCIe HD graphics card, e.g. AMD HD7450: Audio output from Intel CPU is over HDMI, DP or DVI (DVI only if in bios is function Audio over DVI and you need DVI > DP or DVI > HDMI cable: -
reboot12 started following [Research] Windows 7 and eMMC drives
-
I tried this on my Dell Wyse 5070 GeminiLake but Win7 installer still not see eMMC disk. My disk ID: PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_31CC I tried also replace some Vendor Device e.g. TED PCI\VEN_1679&DEV_3000 to PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_31CC in sdbus.inf but still not help: dism /mount-wim /wimfile:boot.wim /index:2 /mountdir:mount dism /image:mount /add-driver /forceunsigned /driver:eMMC dism /image:mount /add-package /packagepath:Windows6.1-KB2732471-v2-x64.msu dism /unmount-wim /mountdir:mount /commit I run installer pressing F8 then select Disable Driver Signature Enforcement
-
WinXP SP2 64-bit on Asus J1800I-C BayTrail
j7n replied to reboot12's topic in Windows XP 64 Bit Edition
I'm getting old. How is there a sound card inside an Intel processor? Where does it output the audio? Only on HDMI? -
So it can read memory from Supermium itself right, not crash other programs by writing to their memory? I'd be more worried if it could crash my PC since I run as administrator. Could one really make a gain out of this reliably? Memory addresses change.