TSNH Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 Works for me on XP with just sp3, KB942288, wic x86, visual c++ (no POSReady updates) and 2003 sp2 with the same additional updates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 28 minutes ago, TSNH said: Works for me on XP with just sp3, KB942288 why do you use it on XP ? https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=KB942288 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSNH Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Milkinis said: why do you use it on XP ? https://www.catalog.update.microsoft.com/Search.aspx?q=KB942288 Not sure lol. I just have it on my list of updates that I use for XP and 2003. If the installation fails on XP, then It means that it's probably not installed I guess I just needed it for Server 2003 for some reason at some point Edited January 28 by TSNH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 hour ago, nicolaasjan said: Why such an unfriendly answer on this sunny Sunday morning? That's not what it was. Scientific Approach has to eliminate ONE variable at a time. That was the ONE variable that OTHERS needed to chime in on once it was introduced AS a variable. Supermium DOES work for OTHERS that have PosReady, so NOW we can eliminate that variable. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TSNH Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 This is on Intel GMA 3600 integrated with this CPU. No gpu acceleration is supported by the driver, so maybe you have to disable that? That Server 2003 screenshot was from vmware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 23 minutes ago, TSNH said: That Server 2003 screenshot was from vmware I don't use XP x64 aka Server 2003 (NT 5.2) but someone claimed Supermium for XP is twice as much faster. I don't give too much credit to these synthetic speed tests based on netwok connections but can anyone else confirm this ? https://browserbench.org/Speedometer2.0/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) 2 hours ago, Milkinis said: someone Guessing i'm that someone. Mypal 68 and Supermium, side-by-side, XP x64 on x99. This is on overkill HW, but anything Sandy Bridge & up with 4 gigs or more should show a similar spread. Subjectively, it's also much faster. P.S. Mypal 68 & Supermium side-by-side, 32-bit XP on Haswell P.P.S. Mypal 68 & Supermium side-by-side, 64-bit on x58 2 hours ago, Milkinis said: based on netwok connections Speedometer 2.0 is not based on connection speed. Edited January 28 by 66cats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 13 minutes ago, 66cats said: Speedometer 2.0 is not based on connection speed. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184944-could-web-enviornment-integrity-block-old-operating-systems/page/2/#comment-1250108 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) 14 minutes ago, Milkinis said: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184944-could-web-enviornment-integrity-block-old-operating-systems/page/2/#comment-1250108 Can't readily explain this, but the test does run without an internet connection: Running on disabled connection Result Edit: Might've misunderstood what you were trying to say, thought the spread between wired & wireless was nontrivial (it isn't). Edited January 28 by 66cats Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicolaasjan Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 1 hour ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: That's not what it was. Scientific Approach has to eliminate ONE variable at a time. That was the ONE variable that OTHERS needed to chime in on once it was introduced AS a variable. Supermium DOES work for OTHERS that have PosReady, so NOW we can eliminate that variable. OK, thanks. I see. Now I'm very curious what the real culprit might be. Maybe the author can find something in the dump files we sent him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkinis Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 19 hours ago, Dixel said: I'm more curious about the "script the browser needs to run". https://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=51193&start=364&limit=1&m=1#1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 5 hours ago, Milkinis said: https://forum.ru-board.com/topic.cgi?forum=5&topic=51193&start=364&limit=1&m=1#1 Thanks, but I think it's not that script win32 wrote about, it looks like a custom made one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VistaLover Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 (edited) On 1/27/2024 at 9:49 PM, nicolaasjan said: I did that earlier today. ... Er, you might want to correct that LINK of yours there (I'm reading this "heated" thread today, on a Sunday, so just stumbled on that) ... Edited January 29 by VistaLover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dixel Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 11 hours ago, TSNH said: Why such an extracting nonsense? Probably to still keep the project open-source and at the same time charge lazy non-tech experienced users for the premium installer on XP. Not a bad idea actually. Supermium ==> Supremium Someone, suggest to win32. I'm not gonna charge for this name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
66cats Posted January 28 Share Posted January 28 6 hours ago, nicolaasjan said: No, it doesn't. Hi, sorry if this was mentioned already, but have you tried sticking progwrp.dll in \windows\system32 folder? Also: what's the file size of your progwrp.dll? (already had a 13KB progwrp.dll sitting in mine, the new one should be 125KB) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now