MyPal 68

[NotHereToPlayGames]

2 hours ago, dmiranda said:

Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique

You do realize that this is NOT A GOOD THING.  Another way to say this is that they know EXACTLY who you are, that 190,855 people have visited and they know *EXACTLY* which one of those 190,855 people is YOU.

[dmiranda]

49 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

You do realize that this is NOT A GOOD THING.  Another way to say this is that they know EXACTLY who you are, that 190,855 people have visited and they know *EXACTLY* which one of those 190,855 people is YOU.

Same said of prior visits, same day, same browser.

[XPerceniol]

Yeah but also unique using:

ArcticFoxie/NotHereToPlayGames -- 360Chrome v13.5.1030 Redux and New Moon 28 20231223

Unless there is something I'm not getting @NotHereToPlayGames and @dmiranda and @mina7601

Looking forward to hearing more and I a little surprised the @Sampei.Nihira hasn't chimed in as of yet, but perhaps he is VERY busy dealing with other happenings.

I was under the impression that it is not (so much) about spoofing the UA rather (actually) using Win10 with plain Vanilla chrome as I see the Browser Market Share Worldwide as I read it today appears to be:

Chrome62.85%

Safari20.04%

Edge5.5%

Firefox3.23%

Opera3.17%

Samsung Internet2.44%

So isn't using FF on XP unique no matter what? I'm on bare metal XP using these browsers BTW

I have no interest nor do I need to bother with TOR, admittedly so, there is still a lot I don't know and I'm always learning from knowledgeable members.  

Edited December 25, 2023 by XPerceniol

[Sampei.Nihira]

Guys,consider that I was (today I am retired) an IT security.
The only method to achieve non-uniqueness is to use an extension called JShelter and (perhaps) have it in the browser (WebGL + WebRTC by default).

But I very much doubt this result.

I would not recommend those using a Firefox-based browser to use JShelter.

Those using Arkenfox.js directions will never arrive at a result of NOT uniqueness in that test.

I believe that even in Chromium-based browsers it is better to follow the directions of Arkenfox.js.

And use only uBlock Origin and no other privacy-specific extensions.

 

P.S.

In my opinion, therefore, these tests are more valid:

https://browserleaks.com/

I am quite happy with the results obtained with my Edge.
Just 2 examples:

 

 

 

Edited December 25, 2023 by Sampei.Nihira

[XPerceniol]

Again, thanks as always for sharing your knowledge with us when you should be out fishing and enjoying your retirement and for taking time away from your holiday to post today - we're grateful to have you here at MSFN!

26 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

Guys,consider that I was (today I am retired) an IT security.
The only method to achieve non-uniqueness is to use an extension called JShelter and (perhaps) have it in the browser (WebGL + WebRTC by default).

But I very much doubt this result.

I would not recommend those using a Firefox-based browser to use JShelter.

Those using Arkenfox.js directions will never arrive at a result of NOT uniqueness in that test.

I believe that even in Chromium-based browsers it is better to follow the directions of Arkenfox.js.

And use only uBlock Origin and no other privacy-specific extensions.

 

P.S.

In my opinion, therefore, these tests are more valid:

https://browserleaks.com/

I am quite happy with the results obtained with my Edge.
Just 2 examples:

Thank you very much - I do use Arkenfox.

This is what I pulled off from https://browserleaks.com/

HTTP User-AgentMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win32; x86; rv:119.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/119.0

Client Hints JavaScript API

API Support× False

brandsundefined

mobileundefined

platformundefined

platformVersionundefined

architectureundefined

bitnessundefined

wow64undefined

modelundefined

uaFullVersionundefined

fullVersionListundefined

Client Hints HTTP Headers

Sec-CH-UAnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Platformnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Mobilenot received

Sec-CH-UA-Full-Versionnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-Listnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Versionnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Archnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Bitnessnot received

Sec-CH-UA-WoW64not received

Sec-CH-UA-Modelnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Form-Factornot received

Sec-CH-Langnot received

Sec-CH-Save-Datanot received

Sec-CH-Widthnot received

Sec-CH-Viewport-Widthnot received

Sec-CH-Viewport-Heightnot received

Sec-CH-DPRnot received

Sec-CH-Device-Memorynot received

Sec-CH-RTTnot received

Sec-CH-Downlinknot received

Sec-CH-ECTnot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Schemenot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Motionnot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparencynot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Contrastnot received

Sec-CH-Forced-Colorsnot received

 

 

Edited December 25, 2023 by XPerceniol
fixing mistakes

[D.Draker]

3 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

Guys,consider that I was (today I am retired) an IT security.
The only method to achieve non-uniqueness is to use an extension called JShelter and (perhaps) have it in the browser (WebGL + WebRTC by default).

But I very much doubt this result.

I would not recommend those using a Firefox-based browser to use JShelter.

Those using Arkenfox.js directions will never arrive at a result of NOT uniqueness in that test.

I believe that even in Chromium-based browsers it is better to follow the directions of Arkenfox.js.

And use only uBlock Origin and no other privacy-specific extensions.

 

P.S.

In my opinion, therefore, these tests are more valid:

https://browserleaks.com/

I am quite happy with the results obtained with my Edge.
Just 2 examples:

 

 

 

No, you didn't post the most interesting result with your canvas (which they discuss).

https://browserleaks.com/canvas

As for Webrtc, it's not interesting, it's achieved with any primitive extension or setting.

[XPerceniol]

Ugh

I think I'll just hide under the coffee table.

Edited December 25, 2023 by XPerceniol

[Sampei.Nihira]

@D.Draker

My extensions:

And Canvas is not the most important test.

 

 

[Sampei.Nihira]

@XPerceniol

*** Canvas test ***
I get the same result in Edge.

For me it is more than enough.

Edited December 25, 2023 by Sampei.Nihira

[XPerceniol]

8 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

@XPerceniol

*** Canvas test ***
I get the same result in Edge.

For me it is more than enough.

Thank you very much, and if its more than enough for you that I'm swell; as well.

Hmmmm ... "swell; as well" ... I didn't do that on purpose but it has a ring to it.

Edited December 25, 2023 by XPerceniol

[AstroSkipper]

I am interested in any news or discussions about Mypal 68. But at this point, I wonder what Edge browser settings or extensions have to do with a thread about Mypal 68.  To be honest, such posts are simply offtopic. It would be easy to create a new thread for this if not yet present. 

[NotHereToPlayGames]

[UCyborg]

I am 100% unique in canvas test in my usual browsers, but I have them customized to my liking, including font rendering parameters, which does change the fingerprint.

[D.Draker]

5 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

@D.Draker

My extensions:

And Canvas is not the most important test.

 

 

The extensions you use in Edge are not relevant to this topic. And you are wrong, canvas is very important, like @UCyborgwrote - it's even used by youtube.

 

[D.Draker]

I'll add: it's used by cloudfare and instagram uses Canvas toDataURL when uploading a photo.

@Sampei.Nihira, canvas fingerprinting in a firefox based browser, this is what they talk about here.