Jump to content

Dave-H

Super Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,615

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    77

  • Donations

    50.00 USD 

  • Country

    United Kingdom

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Dave-H

  1. Dave-H
    Thanks for the heads-up!
  2. Dave-H
    Not at the moment. It has been talked about on GitHub, but I don't think things ever progressed.
  3. Dave-H
    The extension's 'action button' probably doesn't appear on the extensions toolbar by default. If the extension is installed, look at the drop-down which appears when you click the extensions button (the one which looks like a jigsaw piece). There should be a pin icon next to the extension's icon, and the button should come and go when you click it.
  4. Dave-H
    The thread title has been updated.
  5. Dave-H
    I know nothing about the technicalities of this issue. Only Xper has the necessary access to investigate it as the forum owner. Whatever the cause, and whether it's related to an issue with the board's server or not, it is apparently only affecting a very small number of people. That to me would logically indicate an issue with their particular setups, including their ISPs and geographical location. I am quite certain that if this could have been fixed by the MSFN administrators, it would have been.
  6. Dave-H
    This may help.
  7. Dave-H
    Because in this context, it is.
  8. Dave-H
    Registry recovery discussion moved here.
  9. Dave-H
    This is not the place to discuss and argue over disputes which are now ancient history. Please stay on-topic discussing current issues.
  10. Dave-H
    This is something you should really ask Shane the developer about on GitHub. It has already been asked about last year, and Shane didn't dismiss the idea, but it doesn't look as if it's progressed. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/discussions/1272
  11. Dave-H
    Thanks. Hopefully those issues can be addressed in the release version, although it will still be Chromium 144 of course.
  12. Dave-H
    It was a perfectly reasonable suggestion to you, to consider whether your issue might be being caused by trying to run too much simultaneously on an underresourced machine. Please respect this.
  13. Dave-H
    Yes, I've seen that myself a few times, it looks as if it hasn't posted, but it actually has! Duplicates deleted.
  14. Dave-H
    We've now had two instances of multiple apparently identical posts from two different users. Is this a forum glitch?
  15. Dave-H
    New version 144 now testing.
  16. Dave-H
    @reboot12 @Dietmar Wow! I'm so pleased to see this. I've been in some very long troubleshooting exercises on MSFN in the past myself, but never one as long as this one! I take my hat off to both of you for sticking with it and never giving up. Congratulations to you both. Cheers, Dave.
  17. Dave-H
    No.
  18. Dave-H
    That was nearly a year ago. I'm now using Supermium 138, which spoofs itself as 142, by design, but is definitely actually 138. It's certainly no older than that, and I never accepted the claim that the Supermium developer was deliberately falsifying the Chromium version it was using. I have never had any redirection issues with MSFN.
  19. Dave-H
    Don't worry, you're fine. This sort of thing is exactly what this forum is all about!
  20. Dave-H
    I agree as a general off-topic observation that while you do, of course, need to have a general awareness of security and privacy issues when working online, there's really no need to be paranoid about it.
  21. Dave-H
    We all know where this is going to go. Please get back on topic.
  22. Dave-H
    Edge appears to be the same, so I guess it's a Chromium thing?
  23. Dave-H
    Back on topic please guys.
  24. Dave-H
    Thanks very much for the explanation!
  25. Dave-H
    Thanks @roytam1. Yes, I'm aware that the runtime version I'm using isn't an official XP-compatible version. It was brought to my attention by @Monroe in another thread here. I think it was developed unofficially to help with some games which would not otherwise work on XP. Presumably, as I've now found, it can also cause compatibility problems with some other programs! I will probably keep it installed as a system runtime, but be aware that if any other program now fails to run, that might be the cause. Hopefully all I will need to do then, as with Firefox, is put compatible versions of the necessary runtime DLLs in the program's folder.
×
×
  • Create New...