D.Draker

@Jody Thornton and I, we both see this as an optimisation made by @win32, unless it's proven otherwise, it should be the default opinion since Supermium is developed solely by win32. But then again, you're very welcome to take the matter up to the github admins.

@Dave-H already explained to you in plain English, this is not our issue, this whole borrowing matter is not up for the discussion at MSFN. I can translate this into Russian, if it will make things more clear for you. Please stop posting regarding that subject. Thanks.

NO! We were one million times trough it! Supermium is not open source, neither the dll which is published by @IDA-RE-things.

Why do you post, then? If you don't know. Scroll back and read. In short, a newly joined member @IDA-RE-things accused our long time developer @win32of stealing his code, then the accuser was politely asked by another members to provide proof, instead we only got a longish text from him, without proof. Is it clear?

One doesn't have to understand Russia's language to figure out (or translate) the two words in the first post added by the forum admin. Those say - the programme was wiped out/deleted by the author. There's a link to archive.org given, but it doesn't allow to download the patch.

Jody, for the 1st time I agree with you. But let's not forget the reason @win32 left. Such accusations are very serious and interfere with his work, at least the mood. Our goal is to see him back and work together in a pleasant environment, This is still not looking like one,

Funny, I find 121 to be very fast, close to 110. I guess it drastically changes when someone runs them with all at default.

Client Hints API is becoming the new detection standard very fast. A good example would be Nvidia gaming site which blocks old browsers with the use of that API, Or streaming sites, like our local one. (can't post the link because it may be seen as an ad).

I too see the those squares, along with Dixel, Karla and the OP himself. Any explanations for these? I assume neither of us are on XP.

I started the talk about Chrome 110, and @Dixel wrote what you see as "argument" in the context of @NotHereToPlayGames, who is a repacker/modder, is he not?

I've had all kinds of hardware die, including new RAM modules, but not the ones I bought used.

Welcome! Vista users is what we really need. What does 7601 in the nick mean?

Incredible footage of a lightning bolt hitting and decimating a large tree to dust in Augé, western France earlier today. Credit: Benjamin Estrade https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1807079927595798528/vid/avc1/1080x1080/DqO_8J6lxyOiuou3.mp4

I have a rule of updating my browser in about a year, maybe a bit over a year. 15-16 versions is the maximum where it needs to be thrown away. Just polyfilling simply isn't enough.

Thank you for another compliment! At this point, I'm starting to have doubts about yours. People asked you to stop posting off-topic. Is it really so hard to understand? That we have no way of checking out with simple ways, unless I poke the guys from CIA I worked with. But then again, it's none of my business, I'm just joining other people of this wonderful thread by @AstroSkipper and ask you to stop the derailing.

Probably the new flag for disabling didn't work either. I remember it made no sense in v87. I started to notice the difference when applied the flag only in 110 and up.

How then you explain 110 works for me without dances around the fireplace?

Not a big problem, since everything these days feels like an early alpha. Open source, especially.

Missed outrageous Telegram data breach.

v123 can't block client hints!! They see your real agent, most likely that's why they allowed you to login.

I logged in with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/113.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 (on a 110).

Something's wrong with your Ungoogled. Probably got it from an un-official sources, like Russian repacks? The site works with a random version of Ungoogled 110, which is the bare minimum, the lowest requirement for most sites nowadays.

You got to slim down the installation first, probably use Vista without service pack, It's doable! Turn the page file OFF.

Totally agree! Take AV1 codec, it's royalty free and squeezes out the commercial H265/H264. And it's bad news for the developers' salaries, actually! I mean, this whole shift.

Dave, be a dear, try to check whether the Client Hints alleged block actually works in this new 124 version. https://browserleaks.com/client-hints It needs to say "API not supported". Many thanks! Have a nice day.