Jump to content

D.Draker

Member
  • Posts

    3,846
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    172
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    France

Everything posted by D.Draker

  1. The full name, I know it. Old links are gone, maybe @K4sum1 will find it. Intel-FORCED-5x64-Haswell_6.14.10.5445-drp.exe
  2. I totally agree with you! But then again, 5437 was written for XP, while 5445 can't even allocate VRAM properly.
  3. Did you notice the most notable feature? It has the ability to switch OFF DirectWrite, ungoogled version doesn't.
  4. BSOD stop 50 indicates that invalid system memory has been referenced. Most likely due to the inability to set proper memory allocation since Intel Driver and Intel chipset uses your usual system RAM sticks, it doesn't have its own memory, unlike most dedicated GPUs.
  5. Momiji @K4sum1, from my attempts, the earliest beta driver was the most stable. Though, I have a different device, not GT2. Also, I remember it worked for Dixel on Pentium G, but on Vista.
  6. I edited it out of the pak file, no problem anymore.
  7. Thanks for the opinion, yes, fast. I'm gonna stick with it for a while. I use it in conjunction with the old Dixel's launcher because the browser engine is quite dated (118.
  8. Wow! I knew it! This new member now posts fake programmes. The account with the nick @lll888. I'd like to notify @Tripredacus. It's already quite a lot of posts that member made with dubious software and batch scripts, now this link to fake Kernel.
  9. No assumptions at all, it's what you wrote yourself, read above, all in capslock. Two or three daily poor spammers seem excessive to you, come on, really?
  10. You're welcome, sorry I missed the fact you read it now and replied.
  11. The fella couldn't even get any of these work with much older GT2 device. Read the link I posted. "I tried all available video drivers for Intel Haswell HD Graphics 4600 for Windows XP that can be found from google including: 6.14.10.5437 (14.51.11.5437), 6.14.10.5441 (14.56.0.5441), 6.14.10.5445 (14.56.0.5445), 6.14.10.5449 (14.56.0.5449) and all resulted in BSoD"
  12. I know this device, it's not Haswell, it's Haswell refresh series. Too new for XP.
  13. They are the same, if we talk about ISOs without updates.
  14. I assume you already read it? https://winraid.level1techs.com/t/win-xp-sp3-32bit-driver-for-intel-hd-graphics-4600-on-mb-ga-z97-hd3-and-cpu-intel-haswell-refresh-core-i5-4690k/31509
  15. It's hard to tell for sure without the ID. I do have a modded driver, but no 100% guarantees it would work with the given ID.
  16. And which driver do you attempt to mod? Is it DriverVer=01/30/2014,6.14.10.5449?
  17. They can't, drop it. I tried. Even if you would, you'd still encounter severe bugs later on. From what I 100% know, only the earliest Haswell may have a small chance.
  18. I obviously should have told about the Chinese telemetry in that Browser, but I was quite busy when I posted, and I can't say it has lots of it, in contrast to the original 360 Extreme Explorer, for example. In any case, you all just've been warned!
  19. I have zero problems with reporting bots, just like @Tripredacus once told me to do. It doesn't bother me at all, in a huge contrast to you. I even find them a bit funny, sometimes. The ones that were selling ego-boosting potions, for example.
  20. Thank you very much for the investigation, I felt like something fishy was going on there. I'll upvote tomorrow (I'm out of likes, they are limited).
  21. Pros - a somewhat light, with the most needed customisations, like removing the ugly profile button and the ability to have a really clean UI Officially works on old OS, the release version of Win 7 (2009) for example, works on Vista with a couple of tweaks, works on Win 8 from 2012. No problems with excessive brightness or fonts! Cons - very seldom engine updates. Thoughts?
  22. It's only apparently, apparently is being the keyword in that sentence. One Core API doesn't allow extensions, for example, not to mention it's glitchy as hell!
  23. Cancel that! Nailed it down to an update I installed for one game, removed it, everything is fast again. Moving onto another 15 years cycle.
  24. I don't think so, what if I wanted to write I'm against using cracks, or tell it may even be unsafe? What then? What you suggest is called censorship, and I don't live in a place without the free speech rights.
×
×
  • Create New...