D.Draker

The were several iterations of Direct X 9. Example - B, C, etc.

@AstroSkippercan't update his driver past 307.90. Geforce 8000 and 9000 can't go higher than 341.xx

Thank you, very helpful! members must take example from you!

Trine

CatsXP and Brave creators also haven't "changed" anything. They created a v122 and used v122 colourisation/brightness. So?

tride

What What about Bing AI search copilot? I'd like to try, I use Bing search anyways, I don't care if CIA, FBI or NSA guys read my searches, I don't plot against America.

Like Dave-H once said, such comments trigger off-topic discussions. Hence Astroskipper intervened, there you have it. As for me, my specs are relevant 'cause I have the same USB issue with @UCyborg

The computer made in late 2009, an average MSFN user has much older. Besides, I upgraded its DDR3 RAM to 16GB and added an Nvidia card made in March 2015. It runs on Xeon x3470. It's somewhat similar to Dave-H's.

Thanks, I have a standard Intel USB device (the one that was built in). No USB addon cards. Workstation CELSIUS W280 Systemboard D2912-A1x Personal Computer ESPRIMO P9900 https://support.ts.fujitsu.com/Search/SWP1081232.asp

brine

OK! How then you'd explain CatsXP v122 has no excessive brightness issue? There were images posted before. Brave has no such issue, either. That said, you can't run CatsXP on XP and Windows7, but can on Vista (with ex-kernel).

trick

Thanks, I tried with an old Kingston USB flash 32GB (2013 year or so).

Cruck (British Hooch) "The English midlands boast the best examples of these ancient structures (Brown, R. J, 1986, p67)." https://edwinwestwell.wixsite.com/timberconstruction/cruck-frame-construction#:~:text=Cruck buildings would need at least

Yes, when USB device was attached before, it works, it doesn't work if I attach when the browser was already opened.

Busted, you're lost, you need to pick up from the last word. Names used in English countries are valid words.

track

What does it have to do with the reported issue on github? The 1st image clearly shows the difference. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/627

And you might wanna read my posts (and all the users/others, too), I only get the excessive Brightness with the two clones/non-clones/whatever_they_call_them, I mean Supermium and Thornium. So, why would I change my settings?

You don't have to agree or disagree with the facts. You don't take part in the development. but many thanks from all of us for the measurements! What I really wonder is why the default Chromium values, the right ones, where changed by the developer?

Yeah, for those with a dead CCFL bulbs monitor. For me, Supermium lights up the whole room, I don't need to turn on the lights anymore, so yeah, again, a feature. Mind you, it's with the dark theme! So it's not XP claissic theme bug only, I'm on Vista.

For me, using --no-sandbox helps to solve it, but I don't want to run without sandbox. So using these browsers is currently on hold. Also, due to the brightness issue.

I too have this issue related to USB in both. Any simple USB stick is not detected when one of either browsers is opened. 2009 motherboard. USB 2.0.

I'm starting to think win32 simply has a dull monitor, probably misconfigured videocard/driver setup. It's been reported too many times already, including that github report.