NotHereToPlayGames

Why? Unless their server serves .webp, then why would they care if your browser has that "so-called" security hole fixed or not. WepP is over-exaggerated, doesn't really "effect" folks anywhere near as much as the HYPE AND PROPAGANDA suggests.

Oh, I pretty much guarantee that the answer to that, worded that way, is "nothing". Rather, v114 *plus* v115 brought a SO-CALLED "security fix" that Chase just "has to have".

Not in the slightest. I do everything on a desktop PC, I've never owned anything Android-driven.

As far as that goes, Tampermonkey could also blanket-replace any-and-all libre franklin font-family as it seems this is what is disliked at Digital Spy.

Stylus with the below works, but it seems odd that a "specific" instead of a "global" is required - body, body *, body h1, body h2, body h3, body h4, body h5, body h6, .MessageList .PageTitle>h1 {font-family: unset !important;}

You'll need a Proxomitron fix or a Tampermonkey fix instead of using Stylus. For Tampermonkey, this works - https://github.com/RedwolfPrograms/userscripts/raw/main/custom-fonts.user.js

That was recommended by others also. It has ZERO effect on my system. No clue whether it "should" or not, just know that it has ZERO effect, no decrease in startup time, but no increase either.

On my XP x64, rebasing 360Chrome .dll's actually MADE MY FIRST LAUNCH TIME WORSE. So I actually NEVER rebase my .dll's!

Rebasing .dll's will NOT prevent that "first launch" startup delay. I have ALWAYS had this delay! ALWAYS. Even in 360Chrome on XP. Even in Ungoogled Chromium on Win10.

Official Ungoogled Chromium will still have that settings page but the sync, sign-in, and URL telemetry options are removed completely. Official Ungoogled still offers - 1) "Improve search suggestions" (this is technically only a "Google" thing if your default search engine is Google and you "want" the so-called search "suggestions") 2) profile name, color, and avatar 3) import bookmarks and settings

Does not work! It is labeled as a "work in progress" but it doesn't seem to be doing ANYTHING that an UNGOOGLED browser should do. Easy test, with no open tabs, clear your cache and then go to clear it a second time. An UNGOOGLED browser will NEVER show this after you just cleared your cache and you've not yet visited ANY web site PLUS this is with a profile that HAS NO EXTENSIONS. A Chrome-based browser that is NOT "ungoogled" has a CONSTANT line of communication "open" with the Web Store.

sorry, but the only "association" I have with chocolate is this -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKH3qchAAec

Elusive Samurai https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elusive_Samurai

Sweet! I hadn't even noticed that Thorium may be our first post-360Chrome-v86 for XP that is UNGOOGLED. Will definitely try it out this evening or so.

Euler

This may be worth a try (unable to try here at work) -- https://gist.github.com/nuxodin/3ae174f2a6a112df3ccad22459237a91 https://caniuse.com/mdn-api_submitevent_submitter

Old Farts

I'm keeping it. I will *not* be keeping any Supermium builds - at least not yet, I'll try future builds, but none to date will work on my system - NONE. While real hardware is the goal here, tyr Supermium in a VM. Not sure why it should matter, but it does! Run Supermium in a VM and you WILL throw your computer out the window, throw the keyboard out right behind it, flush your mouse down the toilet, and take your printer outside and hit it with a baseball bat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N9wsjroVlu8

Use - body, body *, body h1, body h2, body h3, body h4 {font-family: unset !important;}

I'm confused. If your computer is single-core, then why were you testing in multi-process mode? Guess I "assumed" that multi-proces was ONLY for multi-core. But it is an "assumption".

That would suggest that the phone is recognized as a "hub" and what is disconnected/powered down is a "secondary" port, the port that does picture/video transfer versus the port that charges the phone. XP powers down the port when disconnected. x86 and x64.

I wouldn't rule it out, if you have a way to test without POSReady. We (plural) [work-related] had several several SEVERAL issues with POSReady. Our IT ended up "banning" POSReady on all factory computers running XP.

Possible. But I have ran both on real hardware on old laptop and from VM on fairly-modern hardware. I get the same results in both - Supermium is the only one pegging at 100% for 2 to 4 minutes, dropping to 2% for 10 seconds, then pegging again for another 2 to 4 minutes. I can only speak towards what I witness - and that is that Thorium works better, much MUCH better, on my hardware. Supermium can NOT be ran from a VM, the 100% CPU is far FAR worse when ran from a VM. But I suppose that's okay, we should be targeting real hardware.

Then you missed when the OP replied that he doesn't want something in the systray so we had to move away from that suggestion. No clue on assistant service, that is "OT to the OP". I'm liking that phrase, I may trademark it.