Jump to content

NotHereToPlayGames

Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    6,773

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    84

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    United States

 Content Type 

Everything posted by NotHereToPlayGames

  1. NotHereToPlayGames
    Process Tamer helps but Supermium is still a NIGHTMARE on my system! An absolute and utter NIGHTMARE! I open a web page and have to wait 24 to 43 seconds before the scroll wheel will scroll the page. Then when it does scroll, I have to wait 7 to 18 seconds for the scrolled-into portion of the page to be displayed. An absolute and utter NIGHTMARE. Yes!!! This test was in a VirtualBox VM of XP SP3 with 3GB RAM - I refuse to attempt Supermium on my host until the next release!
  2. NotHereToPlayGames
    Installer version is working. Seems to only be the "portable" version that does not work.
  3. NotHereToPlayGames
  4. NotHereToPlayGames
    There are several polyfills for Mozilla's lacking link preload. I've not tried any of them. Just a few - https://github.com/jonathantneal/preloadfill/blob/master/package.json https://github.com/digitalkaoz/preload-polyfill https://github.com/aFarkas/link-preload
  5. NotHereToPlayGames
    Jeff Dunham
  6. NotHereToPlayGames
    Definitely not just you. I used to see that problem all over the place when I was on NM28. Too many folks tend to think that javascript is the problem that makes modern sites no longer "work" on older browsers. But that problem has nothing to do with javascript, it's a css issue and it happens a LOT with NM28 on web sites that have a "navigation banner" with dropdown menus.
  7. NotHereToPlayGames
    Lucky you! I get that shift in EVERYTING newer than v86 that works in XP. Chromium ESR, CatsXP, Supermium, Thorium. They ALL do that shift on my system. So at least I guess they're all "consistent". Maybe they're all CLONING each other? waka waka waka
  8. NotHereToPlayGames
    Speaking of Chase and always feeling like a dog "chasing" its own tail, I was recently "forced" to upgrade from XP to Win10 because my checking account could no longer be polyfilled or Proxomitron'd to "working" in XP. That was some time over a month but less than two months ago. I'm wondering if there was enough "backlash" because I just noticed today that my checking account is once again accessible in XP using 360Chrome! While that is good news, I admit that I am now a bit reluctant to return to XP - because that forced upgrade WILL happen again. Two months from now, two years from now, who knows when.
  9. NotHereToPlayGames
    Are you referring to this?
  10. NotHereToPlayGames
    Why? Unless their server serves .webp, then why would they care if your browser has that "so-called" security hole fixed or not. WepP is over-exaggerated, doesn't really "effect" folks anywhere near as much as the HYPE AND PROPAGANDA suggests.
  11. NotHereToPlayGames
    Oh, I pretty much guarantee that the answer to that, worded that way, is "nothing". Rather, v114 *plus* v115 brought a SO-CALLED "security fix" that Chase just "has to have".
  12. NotHereToPlayGames
    Not in the slightest. I do everything on a desktop PC, I've never owned anything Android-driven.
  13. NotHereToPlayGames
    As far as that goes, Tampermonkey could also blanket-replace any-and-all libre franklin font-family as it seems this is what is disliked at Digital Spy.
  14. NotHereToPlayGames
    Stylus with the below works, but it seems odd that a "specific" instead of a "global" is required - body, body *, body h1, body h2, body h3, body h4, body h5, body h6, .MessageList .PageTitle>h1 {font-family: unset !important;}
  15. NotHereToPlayGames
    You'll need a Proxomitron fix or a Tampermonkey fix instead of using Stylus. For Tampermonkey, this works - https://github.com/RedwolfPrograms/userscripts/raw/main/custom-fonts.user.js
  16. NotHereToPlayGames
    That was recommended by others also. It has ZERO effect on my system. No clue whether it "should" or not, just know that it has ZERO effect, no decrease in startup time, but no increase either.
  17. NotHereToPlayGames
    On my XP x64, rebasing 360Chrome .dll's actually MADE MY FIRST LAUNCH TIME WORSE. So I actually NEVER rebase my .dll's!
  18. NotHereToPlayGames
    Rebasing .dll's will NOT prevent that "first launch" startup delay. I have ALWAYS had this delay! ALWAYS. Even in 360Chrome on XP. Even in Ungoogled Chromium on Win10.
  19. NotHereToPlayGames
    Official Ungoogled Chromium will still have that settings page but the sync, sign-in, and URL telemetry options are removed completely. Official Ungoogled still offers - 1) "Improve search suggestions" (this is technically only a "Google" thing if your default search engine is Google and you "want" the so-called search "suggestions") 2) profile name, color, and avatar 3) import bookmarks and settings
  20. NotHereToPlayGames
    Does not work! It is labeled as a "work in progress" but it doesn't seem to be doing ANYTHING that an UNGOOGLED browser should do. Easy test, with no open tabs, clear your cache and then go to clear it a second time. An UNGOOGLED browser will NEVER show this after you just cleared your cache and you've not yet visited ANY web site PLUS this is with a profile that HAS NO EXTENSIONS. A Chrome-based browser that is NOT "ungoogled" has a CONSTANT line of communication "open" with the Web Store.
  21. NotHereToPlayGames
    sorry, but the only "association" I have with chocolate is this -- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKH3qchAAec
  22. NotHereToPlayGames
  23. NotHereToPlayGames
    Elusive Samurai https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Elusive_Samurai
  24. NotHereToPlayGames
    Sweet! I hadn't even noticed that Thorium may be our first post-360Chrome-v86 for XP that is UNGOOGLED. Will definitely try it out this evening or so.
  25. NotHereToPlayGames
    Euler
×
×
  • Create New...