All Activity

@JFX Where do you take the names from from in a specified wim file such as the leaked w11 LTSC version? WinNTsetup shows Windows 11 Enterprise LTSC Canary, but DISM /get-wiminfo doesn't show Canary.

Hello there. i was wondering if it was possible to make a new browser for windows 3.1 or specifically : windows for workstations 3.11. i am wanting to do this because i realized, that there is no modern web browser for wfw 3.11. the only ones i could find where from dos and i couldn't get them to work. i also think it would be easier if it would run directly under windows 3.11. the problem : i have never programmed anything in my life. so i would need lots of help. i tried googeling it, but i couldn't find anything for windows 3.11. i have a virtual machine with internet access set up too in case of need or testing (wfw 3.11). I don't have real hardware at the moment because i'm in Japan. i will try my best to learn everything neccecarry to make it work !!!! all help would be appreciated. -enderlais PS English is not my mother language so I'm sorry if it may be difficult to read, my main language is German. (you can correct my gramer if you want)

Same here. Just downloaded. Will be a weekend or two before I get around to trying it out.

And Facebook... ?

@66cats...Good idea, I was thinking of modding the INF file with the 1030 card to see what would happen. It would be better to compare drivers to see what has changed. I tried plugging into the mobo but the problem was in the BIOS. I had activated the iGPU setting for dual monitors and for some reason it was skipping display during POST. Shorted the pins on mobo to reset BIOS (be sure power is off and power cable unplugged). With BIOS reset the display returned. Then I got other issues, an 0xC0000005 type error (something like STOP: 0x0000008E). When I reset BIOS I left the mobo security feature active and I have an old copy of softice loaded. It loads Windows on top of itself and the security feature did not like that. So, I disabled the Safe Boot feature by deleting Safe Boot keys in BIOS and all is well. I knew that BIOS replaces them if you reset it but I saved a set anyway.. My initial problem with no display was due to a faulty system hive in registry. It was so corrupt I could not delete it yet it looked fine viewing it with an external registry viewer. I think it was chkdsk deleted it for me. Fortunately I had a decent backup from 2021 and it ran fine, right to desktop.

Listviews group header text color is back to dark blue on dark mode. Was good with SAB 3.7.3.

The point of that setting (the one on normal Settings page, not page with flags) is to prevent the web pages to be able to do anything with WebUSB. https://intel.github.io/zephyr.js/webusb/ You'd have to implement another flag or setting in any other shape if you wanted to turn the backend off.

@Mathwiz AFAIK, Supermium is mostly done like this. The point is you get the binary optimized the best as possible for every OS it targets.

It looks like all msstyles edits were removed with the latest update of StartAllBack?

So solid! Hopefully with the new reorganization and Panos Panay out things will get better. Panos is a hardware guy and never should have been in charge of Windows as much as I love Surface. They also got rid of the Bing ads guy that was running Windows for like a month. I guess start menu ads are a holdover from his tenure.

Agree with you ...

Good question; here's an answer, straight from Moonchild himself: https://forum.palemoon.org/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=18678#p137637 TL;DR: Using https to encapsulate another protocol is inefficient, and a VPN would accomplish the same thing more efficiently; therefore DoH isn't needed. Counter-arguments are provided in other posts on the thread. I agree that it's inefficient, but I'm not sure everyone is willing to haul out the VPN sledgehammer just to thwart ISP snooping. After all, if you don't trust your ISP, you're probably skeptical of most commercial VPNs too. DoH lets you separate the knowledge of your browsing into different buckets: your ISP knows which IP addresses you visit, but not which sites at those addresses; the DoH provider knows which sites your IP address is looking up, but not who you are (only your ISP - and probably Google - know that), nor which of those sites are active visits and which are just "noise" from browser plugins and whatnot. (Of course, if you're really worried about these things, you should probably choose a DoH provider other than Google!)

What was MCP's reasoning for not adding it until now? Developers always want to show that they have more security.

Thanks all, tried both suggestions, unfortunately the devices are still scanned and seen at. chrome://usb-internals

I use driver 368.81. Sorry to hear about your health issue.

You don't have to worry about it, it's not used on older OS like XP. Vista needs a small update for 11, KB971512 and for Firefox - KB2117917, too.

From my experience, 382.xx versions and below are the only ones that were written for Windows Vista and 7. Later are just ported 10 drivers. To be 100% sure, try R375 (376.xx) series.

Yes, looks very weird it's still not there, I mean for a fifteen years old totally out-of-support buggy OS.

I'd start with a well-known, 100% proven to be working video driver. Then try another videocard, I had a similar issue, the reason was - one dead VRAM module Korean Hynix. Unfortunately I can't assist in details, I'm still recovering from an eye trauma.

Yeah, there are no plans for XP/Vista support.

i looked it up from vista to xp it are more then 130 functions that are missing even for redfox that dont include external dll´s such as d3d11.dll

Probably Thorium author assumes you have the latest kernel from March 2023 and didn't bother to adjust to the older version.

Thanks for the new version! Unfortunately, I have to report a new issue on Codeberg.org. When opening a website there (here Mypal 68.14.1b in single-process mode), the following message is shown on the top of the site: JavaScript error: e.contentBoxSize[0] is undefined (https://codeberg.org/assets/js/webcomponents.js?v=7.0.0-140-34a85c1536~gitea-1.22.0 @ 10:32190). Open browser console to see more details. Here is a screenshot of the browser console: And when closing the site by clicking the close button, the complete browser closes immediately.

Interesting. I may have to go this route on Win 7. As much as I love @roytam1's Serpent, it looks increasingly like the end is near. My hunch (that's all it is) would be no. The author wouldn't expect anyone to run r3dfox on Win 10 since they could just run vanilla Mo. Besides, why? The question reminds me a bit of @Jody Thornton's request for a 64-bit build of MailNews. Sure, it could be done - the program could check the Windows version and then make different OS calls based on the result - but what advantage would it bring?

You're right, but it's not a matter of DoH someday becoming the "only option" because the last holdout, MCP, finally caved and supported it! DoH's mere existence threatens ad blocking at the router. Let's say you have a Roku app, which of course is completely unrelated to your computer or Web browser. The author of that app doesn't want you to block ads, so he/she/it already has a huge financial incentive to build DoH into the app so you can't. And DoH already exists, so there's nothing (besides a little development cost) to stop the author from doing so. Thanks for the suggestions, but what does it buy me? You of all people should know how much work it takes to remove all the telemetry from 360Chrome. BTW, the soon-to-be-minimum versions at chase.com are Chrome 116 and FF 115. The former won't run on W7, so it's either Supermium, Thorium, one of the 360Chrome versions above, or Mo (my new abbreviation for modern Firefox) 115 ESR. I think I trust Supermium v118 most, but in any case, there's very little true choice left among "modern" browsers. Edit: I just learned of r3dfox (pronounced "red fox"), a Win 7-compatible fork of Mo that will hopefully outlast v115 ESR. Which proves the point @VistaLover was making - that's only five versions above your current "primary" and only five versions older than the "latest and [supposedly] greatest." Google has us all on their "upgrade" treadmill now, even if you skip a handful of versions each time.