All Activity

I'm in no hurry @K4sum1, but I am curious. Will r3dFox be moving into ESR 140 territory? I posted on Eclipse, but I was just curious to know.

I even managed going down to XP build 2474 for Firefox 48.0.2 / Firefox 45.9.x ESR to work. I managed getting Firefox 48.0.2 to work on Windows XP build 2474 at the minimum unofficially, see the text file: And functions like GetModuleHandleExA, GetModuleHandleExW, and IsWow64Process was introduced in build 2474, I tried to replace the stubs (GetModuleHandleExA --> GetModuleHandleA), (GetModuleHandleExW --> GetModuleHandleW), and (IsWow64Process --> GetStdHandle), and Firefox 48.0.2 launches a process (firefox.exe), but not initalized properly on Windows XP build 2469. Is there matching stubs for GetModuleHandleExA, GetModuleHandleExW, and IsWow64Process to try to get Firefox 48.0.2 to work on Windows XP build 2469, is it the system itself, or is 2474 the dead end for Firefox 48.0.2/45.9.x to work? The number of parameters (1, not 2) might not match and it might not return FALSE as needed for that 2469 thing. Firefox48on2474.txt

IMO it sounds like that music software is designed for Win11 taskbar only, which would need to be fixed on the app side. It'd be valuable to check if it also works on Win10.

just found UXP rev 5e8e1208 may cause some UI glitches, and workaround in both ways are committed.

@j7n I've been building with micro-ATX for ages, and recently even mini-ITX. The power is definitely there, and I'm really happy with the onboard I/O. I just worry about the longevity is all. The existence of the standalone cards is exactly why I want this to exist, and why I think it could still work. As you said, the carrier boards are the expensive things. I looked into it (PICMG 1.3 to be exact) and it's basically all industrial enterprise stuff, much of it old AND expensive. Makes it pretty unattractive for a consumer like me, as I could just pick up some cheap used PC for 50$ and be satisfied for long enough given the price.

Sorry to bump, but yeah, this is a glaring issue. I love everything else about StartAllBack, but the search functionality is woefully inadequate compared to the native start menu -- despite its nauseating, ad-riddled bloat.

XYplorer Version 27.10 is the last 32-bit version, the next one will be 64-bit.

tx, so u suggest i should not reply anymore

Just a hunch, but you (Antonino) are very likely replying to a "spambot" (RDS).

what is an assembly? do u mean a good-to-go system? if that is the case, start by making a 15gig vhd, for example with the function provided in winntsetup (u will find the button on the bottom right corner of the application). then install the iso as indicated in the application itself. if u want a cleaner system, u can open sample.ini and take all the semicolons out (this will be important when winntsetup installs ur iso). after u have modified sample.ini, do a bit of studying of the various options wintsetup provides, and when u run into doubts, do not hesitate to ask in more detail here. I will reply asap.

Hi! Please tell me, where I can read more about creating an assembly using the MinWin method?

When I use Startallback, the music software I use (NetEase Cloud Music) will not automatically update information on the taskbar. This problem has occurred on many versions. Can it be fixed?

I'm having some trouble confirming what is the last official shell32.dll version for windows 95 osr 2.x systems. The reason why i ask is because i want to ensure most stable operation, although i will be using a patched explorer.exe mentioned via below thread ( dencorso's method ), but for shell32.dll, i want to be sure im first finding the latest official before any discussion is made on using an unofficial one. I have downloaded a package referenced via mdgx, with windows 95 in the title, but windows 95 is not mentioned anywhere in the microsoft article, which is for q313829. downloading the file and extracting shows shel95.dll 4.72.3812.600, however, this is not the same as shell32.dll, and although the updated shel95.dll may be needed, i want to be sure im also getting the most up to date shell32.dll file. interestingly, the inf specifies shell32.dll under "[SedGen.Sys95]" which i presume to be for windows 95, but no such shell32.dll file exists in the package. indirect / vague source of a user who says one can update to shell32.dll 4.72.3812.600 on windows 95: https://fivetechsupport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=2668 dencorso's method for explorer.exe patched with 256 color tray icon fix ( original ie 4.01 sp2's version of explorer.exe version 4.72.3612.1700 apparently is buggy ):

I have a Dell Wyse 5070 test machine with two disks - eMMC 16 GB and M2 SATA 128 GB I installed on M2 WinXP 64-bit in pure UEFI and the OS works well. I have ported eMMC drivers but the system does not see eMMC disk both on system drivers and on those ported. There is only an SD controller device in the Unknown section in the Device Manager: I added HW ID PCI\VEN_8086&DEV_31CC controller to the sdbus.inf file but nothing helps. eMMC_xp64.zip Installation of the KB934428 update does not help either. P.S. Same eMMC disk works OK in Win10:

Feature Request: It would greatly enhance usability if folders could be pinned directly to the Start menu with flyout menu.

I think the notice should be changed from "From now on" to "Since *date*"

That's how it was until recently. But full size boards with enough slots for everything have become uncommon and expensive. Now even powerful systems for games are built on a micro-ATX board. Video, sound and network are still on cards. I think you can find some USB but not very common.

Now, after @feodor2's versions cleanup, I was able to install Scratchpad 0.7.1 in Mypal 74.1.0 as a replacement for the removed, internal Scratchpad but it doesn't work as intended. The Scratchpad window is partially broken. No possibility to run JavaScript code. From this I conclude that Mypal 74 is not yet at the level of FF 72 or even 74 when it comes to extensions. @feodor2, am I right?

Today, I have installed and tested Mypal 74.1.0. @feodor2, thanks for this new version and for cleaning up the version number chaos! Good job! My favoured Alice0775 script loading method still works with this browser version as I have predicted in previous posts. And I am very pleased that the Custom Buttons extensions and all my self-created scripts also work there. However, one issue is still present in Mypal 74.1.0. Clicking entries in the Add-ons Manager does not work yet and leads to the well-known message that the address is not understood.

@tekkaman Motherboards are such fickle things. I've seen a few die, they seem to be one of the main causes of system failure. I believe integrating lots of things onto one board is probably what's causing that. It would be so cool if modern motherboards could just be a breakout board, with just a bunch of PCI-E. All the end-user I/O like USB, audio and video is supplied by cards. Kind of similar to AT, but even more minimal somehow. More expensive but there's an opportunity to build very modular and specialized systems. If a card or port goes bad, you can replace the particular card. You could also keep all the cards when you decide to upgrade the board. It would really cut down on waste.

Hi for Windows XP SP3 KB4493927 (POSReady) Updates 5.1.2600.7684 Do you need Server 2003 and XP x64 too?

No, they don't show up in this case. If I skim the other writeups, I can see how they should have triggered the "safety police" but apparently did not, which is not fair.

If you sort comments by newest, you can see all "banned" messages.

There are some good AI-blocking lists for uBlock. Unsure if they would remove what you are encountering. Me? I haven't used them. I just use custom style sheets to hide the dumb AI content. But I also use custom style sheets to also hide YouTube "comments". So we are clearly two birds of a different feather.

Suppose you come to this forum and read something that sends your proverbial blood pressure up: that your favorite web browser sucks, feeds Chinese hackers and using WinXP is a threat to national security. You write a moderate rebuttal and everyone ignores it because they really can't see it. The AI has decided that using old software is unacceptable. You come back after a week, write something again including the word "boot.ίnί" and get a silly error. You remove all sensitive words, then obfuscate the word "sυcκs" and it still doesn't work. Would you really come back and continue to read some BS without being able to respond? I would just use a search engine in case I had a problem to solve and not read everything.