Jump to content

HFSLIP - Test releases

Tomcat76

By Tomcat76
in HFSLIP

 Share

Recommended Posts


glentium

glentium

Posted
Posted

So I tried 60617b with INSTALLRC=1 and WINNTUPG folder present: an error message popped out at T-13 telling me that NETMAP.INF was not found, so I had to press OK, then another dialog box saying the "Windows XP Setup cannot continue" (something like that) and I had to click 'Finished...'

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kiki Burgh

Kiki Burgh

Posted
Posted
Huh, what? I've never seen this before.... :unsure:
hi TC!

these were basically like what i posted before ... pls don't mind the headers (i just inserted those on top of the real messages) ... it's the same for the others ...

my apologies for the confusion ... :)

A component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XP ---> this is what i inserted

WindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXE ---> HFSLIP shows the following lines

TEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll

1 File(s) copied

0 File(s) copied

Super-Magician ... i already downloaded the latest ;)

thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomcat76

Tomcat76

Posted
  • Author
Posted

@Kiki: I already explained where the "0 File(s) copied" comes from....

So I tried 60617b with INSTALLRC=1 and WINNTUPG folder present: an error message popped out at T-13 telling me that NETMAP.INF was not found, so I had to press OK, then another dialog box saying the "Windows XP Setup cannot continue" (something like that) and I had to click 'Finished...'
The only reasons I can think of:

1) You don't have NETMAP.INF in WINNTUPG

2) WINNTUPG is not in the right place (it should be in I386)

3) You have an I386 folder in the root of a local partition (eg, C:\), and there is no NETMAP.INF in there

HFSLIP instructs Windows to execute the standard installation command, but with the /unattend switch added to it to make it silent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tommyp

tommyp

Posted
Posted
60617b is "the RC", people. If no new problems have been introduced over 60528, this will be released as the new final on Sunday evening. :)

T - Please allow a few more days for others to test and report back. Sit back, don't code, relax and wait for the population's feedback. Once all is fine, then go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Camarade_Tux

Camarade_Tux

Posted
Posted

:)

French XP SP1a reports, Sir! :)

Patch NOT Installed MS04-024 Q839645

The registry key

**Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet

Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults\shell** does not exist. It is

required for this patch to be considered installed.

This does the trick:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults]
"shell"=dword:00000000

Next:

Patch NOT Installed MS06-011 Q914798

The registry key **SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows

XP\SP2\KB914798** should have a value of 2. It has a value of 1.

Solution:

Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Updates\Windows XP\SP2\KB914798]
"Installed"=dword:00000002

This one is a problem:

Patch NOT Installed MS06-021 Q916281

File C:\WIN\system32\browseui.dll has a file version [6.0.2800.1106]that is less than what is expected [6.0.2800.1692].

And now files greater than expected:

Warning MS05-051 Q902400

File C:\WIN\system32\txflog.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\rpcss.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is

greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\olecnv32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that

is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\olecli32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that

is greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\ole32.dll has a file version [5.1.2600.1801] that is

greater than what is expected [5.1.2600.1720]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\es.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that is

greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\comuid.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64] that

is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\comsvcs.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]

that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\comrepl.dll has a file version [2001.12.4414.64]

that is greater than what is expected [2001.12.4414.62]. - File

C:\WIN\system32\com\comadmin.dll has a file version

[2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected

[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\colbact.dll has a file

version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected

[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\clbcatq.dll has a file

version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected

[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\clbcatex.dll has a file

version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected

[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\catsrvut.dll has a file

version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected

[2001.12.4414.62]. - File C:\WIN\system32\catsrv.dll has a file

version [2001.12.4414.64] that is greater than what is expected

[2001.12.4414.62].

* INTERNET EXPLORER 6 SP1

Warning MS05-044 Q905495

File C:\WIN\system32\msieftp.dll has a file version [6.0.2800.1724]

that is greater than what is expected [5.50.4956.500].

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomcat76

Tomcat76

Posted
  • Author
Posted

@Camarade_Tux:

#1 is odd. HFSLIP copies the installation INF from the hotfix package, and it contains the registry entry you need. So it's strange that the key isn't created. This is the relevant line:

HKLM,"Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings\ZoneMap\ProtocolDefaults","shell",0x10001,0x0

It could be that the "0x0" makes it fail but I'm not sure.

#2 is a problem. This hotfix doesn't contain any updated binaries and the installation INF has a name (update_SP1QFE.inf) which is normally associated with an installation folder called SP1QFE which isn't present. These hotfixes are given special treatment but for some reason this fails. The installation INF (which contains the necessary info) is not handled (or at least doesn't end up in SOURCESS\I386). I also see this installation INF is doing some special stuff which is beyond the scope of a "default" install. I'm going to have it installed from SVCPACK but not before I found out why the INF is not processed for such hotfixes.

I still need to check #3.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomcat76

Tomcat76

Posted
  • Author
Posted

@Camarade_Tux:

#1... The key is being inserted if you use HFSLIP 60618a. I'm still wondering why it fails. Do you have this key at least:

HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Hotfix\KB839645

That's the other reg key created by the hotfix.

#2... Heh. It looks like HFSLIP already puts this hotfix in SVCPACK. Where are my thoughts?

HFSLIP lets this hotfix install itself so there's nothing that can be done (at least not easily). If I just insert a reg key from HFSLIPWU.INF it will be overwritten when the hotfix installs. It's strange that HFNetChk complains about something that the hotfix does...

#3... Fixed. The IE6 cumulative updates for XPSP1 need the RTMQFE binary versions. I forgot to update HFSLIP for the new cumulative update.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glentium

glentium

Posted
Posted

Argh! I killed me!

NETMAP.INF is not in any of my original source discs... (all hp Restore Discs and Operating System CDs) It's not in the SP2 slipstreamed cd from hp, neither in their SP1 disc. When I manually slipstreamed SP2 in the SP1 source, the update did create the WINXXUPG folders in I386. I just didn't bother checking what files they contain, assuming everything should be there... which, evidently, is not the case.

I guess I won't bother anymore with this RECOVERY CONSOLE thing, as I don't think of any situation I'll every need it.. (I just tried the INSTALLRC option to see if it works on me) All my data files are in a separate secondary hard drive. When something goes wrong, I just insert my HFSLIPped CD and restart... and before I could finished my coffee... TAH-DAAAH!!! A fresh Windows XP... :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomcat76

Tomcat76

Posted
  • Author
Posted

@glentium...

That's good to hear. Well, not good... :D

@the_guy...

That appears to be Tux's problem but I can't duplicate it.

@Camarade_Tux...

What file date does BROWSEUI.DL_ have in your SOURCE? If it's more recent than June 18, 2005, it won't be updated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Camarade_Tux

Camarade_Tux

Posted
Posted (edited)
@Camarade_Tux...

What file date does BROWSEUI.DL_ have in your SOURCE? If it's more recent than June 18, 2005, it won't be updated.

I had to ask my mother... please be patient, I will probably have to wait until I can access the computer myself. :P

And since she has problems with files, I don't really want to know what she would do with the registry. :D

edit : at least she read my mail but now she has problems with Windows Explorer. :lol:

....

it seems it was last modified on 29/08/02.

She did it ! :w00t:

Edited by Camarade_Tux
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Tomcat76

Tomcat76

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I know all about mothers and computers. Sometimes I wonder if it was a good move to teach her the shift+Delete action... :rolleyes:

Your source file seems to have the correct date. The only thing I can think of is that you're including the wrong file:

KB916281 for XPSP1: IE6.0sp1-KB916281-Windows-2000-XP-x86-FRA.exe

KB916281 for XPSP2: WindowsXP-KB916281-x86-FRA.exe

Edited by Tomcat76
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Camarade_Tux

Camarade_Tux

Posted
Posted (edited)
I know all about mothers and computers. Sometimes I wonder if it was a good move to teach her the shift+Delete action... :rolleyes:

I once told my mother to use Shift+Del and immediately said "no, don't!". She would have wiped the whole folder. :P

Your source file seems to have the correct date. The only thing I can think of is that you're including the wrong file:

KB916281 for XPSP1: IE6.0sp1-KB916281-Windows-2000-XP-x86-FRA.exe

KB916281 for XPSP2: WindowsXP-KB916281-x86-FRA.exe

I'll check that asap.

Since HFSlip uses something similar, maybe someone here can help me : http://www.msfn.org/board/index.php?showtopic=76608

Or did you stumble on the same problem (I saw hfslip uses for... instead of a "dir /B > smurf.ddf") ?

Thanks.

Edited by Camarade_Tux
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...