NtegrA Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 I think that might be a problem. But it worked for me on Win2K...Sorry it took so long. Passed out for a bit there (YAWN)...Anyways, I tried both ways. If dotnet2 is first, 1.1 does not show in Add/Remove. Other way around, everything looks cool. Still is there a way to test for 1.1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 If you go to WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework or WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework, do you see a subfolder called v1.1.4322 or just v2.0.50727? Don't mind the folder for 1.0...I already suspected that the order might be playing a role so removed the extra .NET 2.0 handling from the latest releases again. For that work, HFSLIP would have to take into account the inclusion of .NET 1.1 too which means a heck of a lot more code (to exclude it from being parsed by other sections, etc).Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)...Option 1:1DOTNET1.EXE (your silent .NET 1.1 installer)2DOTNET1SP1.EXE (your silent .NET 1.1 SP1 installer)3DOTNET1up.EXE (your silent KB886903 installer)4DOTNET1lng.EXE (your silent .NET 1.1 langpack)5DOTNET2.EXE (Aserone's silent .NET 2.0 installer)6DOTNET2lng.EXE (your silent .NET 2.0 langpack)Option 2:DOTNET11.EXE (silent .NET 1.1 installer including SP1, KB886903 and langpack)DOTNET20.EXE (silent .NET 2.0 installer including langpack + hack for installation at T-13)You can make these two installers with the "beta" of MultiCompiler 2. Have you tried it already? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommyp Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 To all (not Tomcat) - What is the big h@rdon about DOTNETx? I mean, IMHO, it's not really required for the OS. It's a program. Is MS Office a operating system an OS requirement? No. Why not just use your own crafted post-windows installers for installing dotnet (and any other programs you want to install)? My PC runs GREAT without dotnet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super-Magician Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 - [HFANSWER]"MakeNoISO" and "InstallRC" (when used) should now be named "MAKENOISO" and "INSTALLRC"Um, technically, the actual variable names are not case-sensitive. I tested this the other day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NtegrA Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) To all (not Tomcat) - What is the big h@rdon about DOTNETx? I mean, IMHO, it's not really required for the OS. It's a program. Is MS Office a operating system an OS requirement? No. Why not just use your own crafted post-windows installers for installing dotnet (and any other programs you want to install)? My PC runs GREAT without dotnet.Not a biggie to me, just figured I'd give it a try. I had always been installing 1.1 after first install along with other base apps. BUT, I kinda consider dotnet a part of the OS as other apps rely on it. Same with say, JAVA (even though I install this at first reboot as well). I only load JAVA because IE requires (kinda) it.If you go to WINNT\Microsoft.NET\Framework or WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework, do you see a subfolder called v1.1.4322 or just v2.0.50727? Don't mind the folder for 1.0...Just compared both runs. They each have both folders populated. Any further test? (I think I need a 1.1 specific app?)Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)...Is this built into the 060616a?You can make these two installers with the "beta" of MultiCompiler 2. Have you tried it already?No (sorry) Edited June 16, 2006 by NtegrA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)...Is this built into the 060616a?HFSLIP has always supported silent installers from HFSVCPACK (formerly HFSVPK).BTW... I just updated MultiCompiler 2. If both .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are detected, it asks you whether you want to merge it all into one file... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NtegrA Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) Here's two options for you (all from HFSVCPACK)...Is this built into the 060616a?HFSLIP has always supported silent installers from HFSVCPACK (formerly HFSVPK).BTW... I just updated MultiCompiler 2. If both .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0 are detected, it asks you whether you want to merge it all into one file... I just meant because of the filenames. Should naming a certain way order the install? I think I will just continue installing at first reboot. That worked for my situation. Edited June 16, 2006 by NtegrA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) HFSLIP just copies the files from HFSVCPACK into SOURCESS\I386\SVCPACK and echoes the executable names into SVCPACK.INF alphabetically. So if the order is important change the name(s) and you're good to go. Looking at your other thread, you're already doing that. Edited June 16, 2006 by Tomcat76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NtegrA Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 echoes the executable names into SVCPACK.INF alphabetically. DUH, I wasn't paying attention Dosnet2 before netfxsp1. I really need some sleep!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 16, 2006 Author Share Posted June 16, 2006 Whoops... It just occured to me that I'm mixing you up with someone else... There is no "other thread" from you and I didn't ask you to try MC2 before...Looks like I'm the one who needs some sleep, hehe... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kiki Burgh Posted June 16, 2006 Share Posted June 16, 2006 (edited) hi!just wanted to share ... i saw these ran through my screen ...SBP-2 drive stops responding when you try to write data in Windows XPWindowsXP-KB885464-x86-ENU.EXE TEMP\SP2QFE\ohci1394.sys1 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedInitialization phase of a Setup program may take longer than expected to complete in Windows XPWindowsXP-KB885898-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\msi.dllTEMP\SP2QFE\msiexec.exe2 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedA component that runs in the same process as the Windows Time service is stopped or is disabled unexpectedly in Windows XPWindowsXP-KB888432-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\w32time.dll1 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedMS05-020: Cumulative security update for Internet ExplorerWindowsXP-KB890923-x86-ENU.exeTEMP\SP2GDR\browseui.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\cdfview.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\iepeers.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\inseng.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\mshtml.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\msrating.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\shdocvw.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\shlwapi.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\urlmon.dllTEMP\SP2GDR\wininet.dll10 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedPacket-writing programs for optical media recording devices run slower than expected on Windows XP Service Pack 2-based computersWindowsXP-KB891070-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlmp.exeTEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrnlpa.exeTEMP\SP2QFE\ntkrpamp.exeTEMP\SP2QFE\ntoskrnl.exe4 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedFIX: You may receive a "Page cannot be displayed" error message when you click a hyperlink to view a Microsoft Office document in Internet Explorer 6 Service Pack 1WindowsXP-KB892056-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\mshtml.dllTEMP\SP2QFE\urlmon.dll2 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedFIX: You may receive a "This operation has been canceled due to restrictions in effect on this computer" error message when you try to open the Internet Options dialog box in Internet Explorer 6WindowsXP-KB894179-x86-ENU.EXETEMP\SP2QFE\shdocvw.dll1 File(s) copied0 File(s) copiedSoftware update 898461 installs a permanent copy of the Package Installer for Windows version 6.1.22.4WindowsXP-KB898461-x86-ENU.exe0 File(s) copiedThe embedded resource version of the LIP MUI files is incorrect in Windows XP Starter EditionWindowsXP-KB913808-x86-ENU.exe0 File(s) copiedi may have to take these out or would this be script related issue? incidentally, i noticed that 60615a was a bit smaller in file size (144 as compared to 145 in earlier vers) ... moreover, the slipstreaming time went down to 30-31mins again for me ... just like what i mentioned in my embarrassing post earlier, it used to last as long as 40+ mins ... considering i even added the newer updates using 60615a ...i just hope this post is not yet too late knowing that 60616a is already out ... (which i already downloaded) thanks! Edited June 16, 2006 by Kiki Burgh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 Huh, what? I've never seen this before.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glentium Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 Question:Is it possible to add a feature in HFSLIP to ignore MAKENOISO in HFANSWER.INI if in MAKEISO mode? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted June 17, 2006 Author Share Posted June 17, 2006 The "MAKENOISO" feature was introduced in 13a and your suggestion (Super-Magician's suggestion, actually) was implemented in 13b... So no need to implement it again... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super-Magician Posted June 17, 2006 Share Posted June 17, 2006 i just hope this post is not yet too late knowing that 60616a is already outWe're already up to 60616b now . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now