NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 1 hour ago, sonyu said: is there someone who has downloaded the files in this topic that is now infected with the TJPROJMAIN.EXE virus ???????????????????? I have them. And no, I am not infected with "TJPROJMAIN.EXE". I do not run any anti-virus. I only tried them in Win10 just for the curiousity of a new browser. I don't think you got "TJPROJMAIN.EXE" from this thread. (2/23/23) 3
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 i only tried one of the v111's. I didn't get around to trying v112. 2
mina7601 Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 4 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: i only tried one of the v111's. I didn't get around to trying v112. Same here. I only tried 111.0.5535.0. 1
mina7601 Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 Btw, @sonyu, no, I didn't get infected with the TJPROJMAIN.EXE virus either. 1
upadi Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 (edited) Hi all, new member here, I downloaded the files yesterday and virus total say is all ok https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/12b3c3072139ca763385b142345b9b5d6b99cad0aaa3d6f42c36cea0161dbb37?nocache=1 https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/d2bfc4695278c761ddbcd4e7f36ffa37056a8212430d5b23712443a5ee39a11a Edited February 27, 2023 by upadi 2
sonyu Posted February 27, 2023 Posted February 27, 2023 (edited) Thanks to you all Since I can't find https://github.com/jack51706/byte_stinker compiled, I searched all partitions for .exes containing TjProjMain and I deleted lot of downloads. If anybody can compile this and send me it by dm, will be also useful for you all since I don't know if there is another option to recover .exes infected by this virus even Malwarebytes doesn't recover your .exes I think how to recover the infected .exe files using stinker.exe: https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/66956355/125113641-9666ed00-e0f1-11eb-920d-30e6d759d478.mp4 Edited February 28, 2023 by sonyu 1
Cocodile Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 I don't see any links here. You mean you all downloaded the modified chrome made by that guy from poland and got infected, then he just vanished and locked the topic. I also find it suspicious. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184445-chromium-111-and-112-for-vista7-and-8081-backport/
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 No! Two of us were NOT infected and the guy that WAS infected has been infected in the past. So whatever the guy did in the past, he did it again and it has NOTHING to do with the modified Chrome that was shared herein. 3
Cocodile Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: No! Two of us were NOT infected and the guy that WAS infected has been infected in the past. So whatever the guy did in the past, he did it again and it has NOTHING to do with the modified Chrome that was shared herein. Thnx, but that wouldn't explain his sudden departure, would it ?
Cocodile Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 We even exchanged several IMs with him regarding that chrome, everything was fine, nothing out of the ordinary, and then the links suddenly got deleted and he is locked. Now I'm afraid to use that Chrome !!!!!! I asked him a couple of questions right before that ! And then they all got deleted ! You want to tell me it's just a coincidence ?
NotHereToPlayGames Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 (edited) You and D.Draker have the same view. If you want my view (and since you're asking questions, I have to assume that you do), so here goes. Are you familiar with a guy named "Binary Outcast"? He has (had?) a web browser project called "Borealis Navigator". Another project called "Interlink" is also originally his. He never made it to an official public release (at least not for Borealis Navigator, unsure on Interlink). BEFORE he could ever make it to an official public release, a guy named "roytam1" started publicly releasing the same exact project that went by the name of "BNavigator". Look at that name and I'll ask the same question - coincidence? Of course it isn't! This was when "branding issues" and "trademarks" and you name it were "debated" both here and on other "official" forums. Enter this thread! The same EXACT thing just happened! Somebody did not go public with a web browser and somebody else did! An open source browser. NEITHER one of these "somebodies" OWN the original Chrome/Chromium. Mod's to open source software does not make them closed source, this is against the terms of agreement of the original open source code that was mod'd. It could be easily argued that Binary Outcast's "toes were stepped on" when roytam1 started releasing BNavigator. And the same just happened here. But open source is open source. Else roytam1 would no longer be distributing BNavigator. That's my two pennies. Put them in a bank and they'll eventually earn interest. edit - this is just my "view", my "opinion". and opinions are like butts, everybody has one, that doesn't mean everybody wants to hear them. waka waka waka Edited February 28, 2023 by NotHereToPlayGames
sonyu Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 (edited) 51 minutes ago, Cocodile said: I don't see any links here. You mean you all downloaded the modified chrome made by that guy from poland and got infected, then he just vanished and locked the topic. I also find it suspicious. https://msfn.org/board/topic/184445-chromium-111-and-112-for-vista7-and-8081-backport/ No, it seems I was infected before I downloaded the modified chrome. And I'm the only one infected, you can continue all with the topic, it's just a coincidence I noticed it after I download chrome that's why I posted about the possible virus here. The chrome I downloaded was clean. It doesn't have any virus. Sorry. (And my files are clean since yesterday cause I was infected with the same virus 2-3 years ago and now I know a bit more about it) So: NO VIRUS HERE. JUST a personal infection in my computer and not realted to this topic. _ Keep the good work @D.Draker - And one interesting thing about ported chromium: 1080/720 Youtube videoplay in Chrome ver. 111/112 running on Windows 8.0/8.1 removes Intel iGPU micro stuttering. (With, of course, a gpu capable of playing 720/1080.) I noticed this cause it's the only thing I miss from w10 running chrome/ium. I don't know if somebody else noticed the same or if it's related to a concrete system file...... Edited February 28, 2023 by sonyu 5
Jaguarek62 Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 12 minutes ago, sonyu said: 1080/720 Youtube videoplay in Chrome ver. 111/112 running on Windows 8.0/8.1 removes Intel iGPU micro stuttering. (With, of course, a gpu capable of playing 720/1080.) Stuttering? I have few computers with intel hd graphics ranging from sandy bridge to skylake with no stuttering on yt videos. And I don’t really think that it uses gpu anyways since whenever I try 8k60fps on my main pc the cpu gets heavily utilized
Cocodile Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 3 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: You and D.Draker have the same view. The same view on what ?
upadi Posted February 28, 2023 Posted February 28, 2023 In windows 7 i did test the zip version of CatsXP, briefly without internet, only softpedia promote it but is prefarable to wait a little
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now