2 hours ago, dmiranda said:

Your browser fingerprint appears to be unique

You do realize that this is NOT A GOOD THING.  Another way to say this is that they know EXACTLY who you are, that 190,855 people have visited and they know *EXACTLY* which one of those 190,855 people is YOU.

49 minutes ago, NotHereToPlayGames said:

You do realize that this is NOT A GOOD THING.  Another way to say this is that they know EXACTLY who you are, that 190,855 people have visited and they know *EXACTLY* which one of those 190,855 people is YOU.

Same said of prior visits, same day, same browser.

Yeah but also unique using:

ArcticFoxie/NotHereToPlayGames -- 360Chrome v13.5.1030 Redux and New Moon 28 20231223

Unless there is something I'm not getting @NotHereToPlayGames and @dmiranda and @mina7601

Looking forward to hearing more and I a little surprised the @Sampei.Nihira hasn't chimed in as of yet, but perhaps he is VERY busy dealing with other happenings.

I was under the impression that it is not (so much) about spoofing the UA rather (actually) using Win10 with plain Vanilla chrome as I see the Browser Market Share Worldwide as I read it today appears to be:

Chrome62.85%

Safari20.04%

Edge5.5%

Firefox3.23%

Opera3.17%

Samsung Internet2.44%

So isn't using FF on XP unique no matter what? I'm on bare metal XP using these browsers BTW

I have no interest nor do I need to bother with TOR, admittedly so, there is still a lot I don't know and I'm always learning from knowledgeable members.  

Edited December 25, 20232 yr by XPerceniol

Guys,consider that I was (today I am retired) an IT security.
The only method to achieve non-uniqueness is to use an extension called JShelter and (perhaps) have it in the browser (WebGL + WebRTC by default).

But I very much doubt this result.

I would not recommend those using a Firefox-based browser to use JShelter.

Those using Arkenfox.js directions will never arrive at a result of NOT uniqueness in that test.

I believe that even in Chromium-based browsers it is better to follow the directions of Arkenfox.js.

And use only uBlock Origin and no other privacy-specific extensions.

 

P.S.

In my opinion, therefore, these tests are more valid:

https://browserleaks.com/

I am quite happy with the results obtained with my Edge.
Just 2 examples:

 

 

 

Edited December 25, 20232 yr by Sampei.Nihira

Again, thanks as always for sharing your knowledge with us when you should be out fishing and enjoying your retirement and for taking time away from your holiday to post today - we're grateful to have you here at MSFN!

26 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

Guys,consider that I was (today I am retired) an IT security.
The only method to achieve non-uniqueness is to use an extension called JShelter and (perhaps) have it in the browser (WebGL + WebRTC by default).

But I very much doubt this result.

I would not recommend those using a Firefox-based browser to use JShelter.

Those using Arkenfox.js directions will never arrive at a result of NOT uniqueness in that test.

I believe that even in Chromium-based browsers it is better to follow the directions of Arkenfox.js.

And use only uBlock Origin and no other privacy-specific extensions.

 

P.S.

In my opinion, therefore, these tests are more valid:

https://browserleaks.com/

I am quite happy with the results obtained with my Edge.
Just 2 examples:

Thank you very much - I do use Arkenfox.

This is what I pulled off from https://browserleaks.com/

HTTP User-AgentMozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win32; x86; rv:119.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/119.0

Client Hints JavaScript API

API Support× False

brandsundefined

mobileundefined

platformundefined

platformVersionundefined

architectureundefined

bitnessundefined

wow64undefined

modelundefined

uaFullVersionundefined

fullVersionListundefined

Client Hints HTTP Headers

Sec-CH-UAnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Platformnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Mobilenot received

Sec-CH-UA-Full-Versionnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-Listnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Versionnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Archnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Bitnessnot received

Sec-CH-UA-WoW64not received

Sec-CH-UA-Modelnot received

Sec-CH-UA-Form-Factornot received

Sec-CH-Langnot received

Sec-CH-Save-Datanot received

Sec-CH-Widthnot received

Sec-CH-Viewport-Widthnot received

Sec-CH-Viewport-Heightnot received

Sec-CH-DPRnot received

Sec-CH-Device-Memorynot received

Sec-CH-RTTnot received

Sec-CH-Downlinknot received

Sec-CH-ECTnot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Color-Schemenot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Motionnot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Reduced-Transparencynot received

Sec-CH-Prefers-Contrastnot received

Sec-CH-Forced-Colorsnot received

 

 

Edited December 25, 20232 yr by XPerceniol
fixing mistakes

3 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

Guys,consider that I was (today I am retired) an IT security.
The only method to achieve non-uniqueness is to use an extension called JShelter and (perhaps) have it in the browser (WebGL + WebRTC by default).

But I very much doubt this result.

I would not recommend those using a Firefox-based browser to use JShelter.

Those using Arkenfox.js directions will never arrive at a result of NOT uniqueness in that test.

I believe that even in Chromium-based browsers it is better to follow the directions of Arkenfox.js.

And use only uBlock Origin and no other privacy-specific extensions.

 

P.S.

In my opinion, therefore, these tests are more valid:

https://browserleaks.com/

I am quite happy with the results obtained with my Edge.
Just 2 examples:

 

 

 

No, you didn't post the most interesting result with your canvas (which they discuss).

https://browserleaks.com/canvas

As for Webrtc, it's not interesting, it's achieved with any primitive extension or setting.

Ugh

I think I'll just hide under the coffee table.

Edited December 25, 20232 yr by XPerceniol

@D.Draker

My extensions:

And Canvas is not the most important test.

 

 

@XPerceniol

*** Canvas test ***
I get the same result in Edge.

For me it is more than enough.

Edited December 25, 20232 yr by Sampei.Nihira

8 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

@XPerceniol

*** Canvas test ***
I get the same result in Edge.

For me it is more than enough.

Thank you very much, and if its more than enough for you that I'm swell; as well.

Hmmmm ... "swell; as well" ... I didn't do that on purpose but it has a ring to it.

Edited December 25, 20232 yr by XPerceniol

I am interested in any news or discussions about Mypal 68. But at this point, I wonder what Edge browser settings or extensions have to do with a thread about Mypal 68.  To be honest, such posts are simply offtopic. It would be easy to create a new thread for this if not yet present. 

I am 100% unique in canvas test in my usual browsers, but I have them customized to my liking, including font rendering parameters, which does change the fingerprint.

5 hours ago, Sampei.Nihira said:

@D.Draker

My extensions:

And Canvas is not the most important test.

 

 

The extensions you use in Edge are not relevant to this topic. And you are wrong, canvas is very important, like @UCyborgwrote - it's even used by youtube.

 

I'll add: it's used by cloudfare and instagram uses Canvas toDataURL when uploading a photo.

@Sampei.Nihira, canvas fingerprinting in a firefox based browser, this is what they talk about here.