https://imgur.com/a/k0m2jCx

I just let the program pass the firewall without any filter

Edited October 15, 20205 yr by Osan

Only the updroots.sst file has the changed content, the other files have not changed.

Ok. Updated once again.

Will it also affect our Windows XP OS?

I also wonder if chrome-based browsers will have any problems?

https://www.neowin.net/news/lets-encrypt-certificate-switch-to-cause-problems-in-2021

Edited November 10, 20205 yr by Sampei.Nihira

It won't. You already have ISRG Root X1 certificate if you keep certificates up-to-date with the updater here. Firefox based browsers are the special case that use their own certificate store.

37 minutes ago, UCyborg said:

It won't. You already have ISRG Root X1 certificate if you keep certificates up-to-date with the updater here. Firefox based browsers are the special case that use their own certificate store.

I have checked now.
The certificate is present:

TH.

I noticed my XP x64 doesn't handle certain certificates, eg.: Symantec Class 1 Public Primary Certification Authority - G4 - This certificate has an nonvalid digital signature.

I just installed an update KB3072630, which installs supposedly the latest crypt32.dll version 5.131.3790.5668, but the issue remains. Does the certificate use unsupported signature algorithm and this is just how it is on XP or is there a solution?

My version of crypt32.dll is 5.131.2600.6459, which seems rather older than yours, although my system is 32 bit.
I looked at KB3072630, but that seems to be an update for the Windows Installer files, it doesn't contain crypt32.dll.
Is that correct?

It does contain crypt32.dll, you can peek inside the installer with 7-Zip.

http://download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/secu/2015/06/windowsserver2003-kb3072630-x64-enu_e4e5d7c372ddb9474fba3947d45a62cad7051a35.exe

On 11/11/2020 at 3:59 PM, UCyborg said:

I noticed my XP x64 doesn't handle certain certificates, eg.: Symantec Class 1 Public Primary Certification Authority - G4 - This certificate has an nonvalid digital signature.

My guess is that those certificates have sha2 digital signatures only.

1 hour ago, UCyborg said:

It does contain crypt32.dll, you can peek inside the installer with 7-Zip.

http://download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/software/secu/2015/06/windowsserver2003-kb3072630-x64-enu_e4e5d7c372ddb9474fba3947d45a62cad7051a35.exe

OK, yes that version does contain crypt32.dll, as you say.
I was downloading the version of KB3072630 for Windows Embedded POSReady 2009 32 bit, which is right for my system, and that definitely doesn't contain crypt32.dll!
Why versions of the same patch for different versions of the OS should contain different files I have no idea, but I guess that maybe I do have the latest version of crypt32.dll for my system already.

2 hours ago, Vistapocalypse said:

My guess is that those certificates have sha2 digital signatures only.

Apparently XP has limited support for SHA-2 with only supported algorithm being RSA. The mentioned certificate uses ECDSA.

1 hour ago, Dave-H said:

but I guess that maybe I do have the latest version of crypt32.dll for my system already.

Probably, I haven't come across a POSReady 2009 update that would increase the version of crypt32.dll from 5.131.2600.6459.

Thanks!

Hi

Microsoft Trusted Root Certificate List

This is the list of all certificates Microsoft currently trusts and deploys via Windows Update

https://cable.ayra.ch/ca/