NoelC Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 3 hours ago, bigmuscle said: Currently yes. ModernFrame is only experimental hack so it requires non-standard steps. On the other side, SecureBoot does not really increase security in any way, it gives only false safety. Bravo, Big Muscle. It's always SO nice to hear from others who understand that what the industry pushes on us to "increase security" at best only helps protect complete dummies from doing stupid things to themselves. Anyone should question any concept being pushed as "security is good" and "more is better". There are ALWAYS downsides. In this case it is loss of control over what you are allowed run on your own system. So here you are, wanting to add desktop elegance your operating system that Microsoft absolutely doesn't want you to have. Did you REALLY want someone else to tell you what you're allowed to run on your system? -Noel 1
raiden89 Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 18 hours ago, CKyHC said: But you're only one who has this issue. It's mean that something in your system is wrong or conflicting... And check is "RequireSignedAppInit_DLLs"=dword:00000000 key present in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Windows, if so delete this key. From Anniversary Update this key not needed and it makes troubles or issuies. RequireSignedAppInit_DLLs is set to 0. Even if it is just me that has come forward with the issue, I cant use it in its current state. Every single machine and installation is different. Every hardware chip is different than the one next to it. Its very possible to have problems for 1 or some and not for anyone else. I will try it again when another version is released. For now, it will have to stay disabled.
raiden89 Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) 2 hours ago, NoelC said: Bravo, Big Muscle. It's always SO nice to hear from others who understand that what the industry pushes on us to "increase security" at best only helps protect complete dummies from doing stupid things to themselves. Anyone should question any concept being pushed as "security is good" and "more is better". There are ALWAYS downsides. In this case it is loss of control over what you are allowed run on your own system. So here you are, wanting to add desktop elegance your operating system that Microsoft absolutely doesn't want you to have. Did you REALLY want someone else to tell you what you're allowed to run on your system? -Noel This post is 100% completely unnecessary. It's offtopic and more Microsoft bashing. Please take it elsewhere or a moderator will need to be involved. Its cancerous. Edited October 23, 2016 by raiden89
CKyHC Posted October 23, 2016 Posted October 23, 2016 raiden89, I just wanted to say that on my machine with key present "RequireSignedAppInit_DLLs" dll's are NOT loaded at all. I deleted this key and dlls starts to load. This started after Anniversary Update.
genecooper Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) 11 hours ago, raiden89 said: This post is 100% completely unnecessary. It's offtopic and more Microsoft bashing. Please take it elsewhere or a moderator will need to be involved. Its cancerous. Hardly a crime what he posted. It's relevant to the relationship between modernframe and Secure Boot, so I don't see it as off topic. There's more to this site than pure technicalities I would hope. Opinions have a place, and Microsoft could do to listen to users more. Don't forget, aeroglass was the most requested feature in Microsoft's survey of what people wanted to see in Windows 10 and they still blew it off. Edited October 24, 2016 by genecooper 1
UCyborg Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 There is one inconsistency between Win32 and Modern apps. When you maximize the Win32 app, the window frame height is reduced a bit, with Modern apps, the height remains unchanged. Regarding RequireSignedAppInit_DLLs, by default, this DWORD isn't present on desktop Windows variants and the default behavior is to accept unsigned DLLs. Server variants require signed DLLs by default, but I don't know whether the actual DWORD is present in registry by default or does it have to be added manually to change the default behavior. The latest experimental build of Aero Glass that loads UX theme signature bypass DLL by itself without relying on AppInit_DLLs feature is surely a step in the right direction, so we might see the same with ModernFrame.dll in the future. Big Muscle is basically hacking around Windows to give us better user experience without any cooperation from Microsoft at all. It's really commendable work IMHO. 2
adacom Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 not up to date with version numbers so will try to make this post make sense old modernframe with windows 10586? and a custom theme atlas showed modified buttons top right [see image] - new modern frame on Anniversary build again using modified theme atlas shows stock/standard buttons is this as others see things or as i always ask am i doing something wrong
carlitosoo555 Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 (edited) 6 hours ago, genecooper said: Hardly a crime what he posted. It's relevant to the relationship between modernframe and Secure Boot, so I don't see it as off topic. There's more to this site than pure technicalities I would hope. Opinions have a place, and Microsoft could do to listen to users more. Don't forget, aeroglass was the most requested feature in Microsoft's survey of what people wanted to see in Windows 10 and they still blew it off. This is not the right place to complain about the lack of attention by Microsoft to its users, or to complain about Windows 10, there are many topics in MSFN for that and also for haters of Microsoft and Windows 10, here are some examples: If you want to start a discussion totally off topic about Windows 10 and its lack of customization or about Microsoft and its decisions regarding the design of Windows here, let's start it, and let's see if some moderator do something about it or not, lets do it... Edited October 24, 2016 by carlitosoo555
raiden89 Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 11 hours ago, genecooper said: Hardly a crime what he posted. It's relevant to the relationship between modernframe and Secure Boot, so I don't see it as off topic. There's more to this site than pure technicalities I would hope. Opinions have a place, and Microsoft could do to listen to users more. Don't forget, aeroglass was the most requested feature in Microsoft's survey of what people wanted to see in Windows 10 and they still blew it off. Not a crime but very offtopic for half of his post...for example... "So here you are, wanting to add desktop elegance your operating system that Microsoft absolutely doesn't want you to have. Did you REALLY want someone else to tell you what you're allowed to run on your system?" Another snide comment towards Microsoft in a thread completely unrelated. This isnt a "bash windows 10/microsoft because they wont let you run what you want on their OS" thread.
Tripredacus Posted October 24, 2016 Posted October 24, 2016 Raiden89 and Carlitosoo555, you are not moderators. There is nothing wrong with the post so just leave it alone.
Alanrh Posted October 25, 2016 Posted October 25, 2016 (edited) Enough said. Maintain our respect. Edited October 25, 2016 by Alanrh
genecooper Posted October 25, 2016 Posted October 25, 2016 (edited) Quote carlitosoo555 said: This is not the right place to complain about the lack of attention by Microsoft to its users, or to complain about Windows 10, there are many topics in MSFN for that and also for haters of Microsoft and Windows 10, here are some examples . . . . If you want to start a discussion totally off topic about Windows 10 and its lack of customization or about Microsoft and its decisions regarding the design of Windows here, let's start it, and let's see if some moderator do something about it or not, lets do it... Enough already. We're here to enjoy bigmuscle's creation, not be disciplined at every turn. Bigmuscle created areoglass because of Microsoft's disregard of users, so I see the discussion about Microsoft as relevant here. We don't have to over-categorize every discussion. Everything is related in the end. Edited October 27, 2016 by genecooper 3
bigmuscle Posted October 28, 2016 Author Posted October 28, 2016 (edited) So here we have another experiment. Remove any DLL from AppInit_DLLs, disable LoadAppInit_DLLs, download the following archive, open the command line with admin rights and run this command: Install: regsvr32 ModernFrame-x64-Debug.dll Uninstall: regsvr32 /u ModernFrame-x64-Debug.dll Then kill ApplicationFrameHost.exe, restart your computer or whatever :-) http://glass8.eu/out/ModernFrame-x64dbg-2016-10-28a.7z It is DEBUG 64-bit version!!!! Edited October 28, 2016 by bigmuscle
SparkMan61 Posted October 28, 2016 Posted October 28, 2016 (edited) bigmuscle, this stuff brakes explorer.exe after removing Edited October 28, 2016 by SparkMan61 1
bigmuscle Posted October 28, 2016 Author Posted October 28, 2016 (edited) Thanks for the bug report. Could you verify that it is fixed now? It will probably need restart after install/uninstall. Link: http://glass8.eu/out/ModernFrame-x64dbg-2016-10-28a.7z Edited October 28, 2016 by bigmuscle
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now