Trend Micro.

My best weapon against viruses is myself. I dont need no **** anti virus software.

My best weapon against viruses is myself. I dont need no **** anti virus software.

Absolutely.

More resources for things that matter. Such as video encoding and playback.

GData AVK 2004/2005. BD and Kaspersky engines and only 27MB of ram usage for dual engines! Also another VB100 in FEB05.

Wow...27 MBs....that's a whole 27 Mbs that I always have free by not running antivirus.

I just read this at Sourceforge.net:

http://sourceforge.net/potm/potm-2005-02.php

Try ClamWin FREE Antivirus (Project of the month at Sourceforge)

http://www.clamwin.com/

]Bonkers[

I'm using Kaspersky, but I would have to say that Norton is the best or Symtec.

i am using right now kaspersky to try new on-demand technology, but i felt more secure with symantec antivirus corporate 9..

my kaspersky closed down and i didn't noticed anything...

Whats the difference between Symantec Antivirus Corporate Edition and Norton Antivirus (Home Version)?

SAV 9 (9.0.2 is the one we use) can use a server on a newpork to get updates and trigger scans. It's part of a package. It also uses a coommon setup almost mike looking at a ms type software program with tree setu pn the left with options on the right. t's more stable and better. It does cost a lot. But I get it free at work.

I think that what makes a good antivirus is the frecuency of updates.

Half true.

You need a AV with good defence.

Well I like both Kaspersky and Symantec Antivirus. Kaspersky has a good interface and frequent updates but is resource hog although that wouldn't matter to me since so much I have 2GB of RAM & fast processor. I usually install and then uninstall (in VMWare) one of the other to test them when I new update appears but currently I'm using symantec which I would recommend to anybody.

Edited February 26, 200521 yr by 1chaoticadult

Kaspersky Personal 5.0.227

Period.

I voted Nod32 although thankfully I have little knowledge of many. My only other one was Symantec. I rarely ever have had to use either of them, luckily.