dmiranda

I have four set up already. sp52 for daily browsing, and a 360 variant, artifox and mypal ready to go when things go wrong.

Check https://msfn.org/board/topic/178466-force-multiprocess-mode-in-ff-52/

Damn. Be strong and get well, roytam1

Actually, I had just erased, a few days back, the mozillaplugins reg entry, just because. Now I know Better :P Thank you very much, VistaLover. It's gold having you here.

Thanks for testing. Something on my set up, probably. I get this issue even with the latest one published yesterday. I will go back a couple of months and check, over the week. Cheers!

Hi there. The last build of sp52 doesn't recognize the silverlight plugin. Around a month ago, it was working all right.

Thanks! Will have a look.

Can't replicate. But I restrict scripts. Even allowing for scripts in huffpost (alone, none of the load of script the page loads with it), I can see the news (not the pictures, but that will probably can be resolve with further ematrix tweaking).

We shall consider that ff68 is well into the path of mozilla's transformation into whatever the heck it is now. Therefore it includes more spyware features (telemetry is just that plus customer services, heh) than the versions we generally use. I have noticed something of a UID sometimes, but I use mypal (or one of the two 360chrome flavors available) just for social media and stuff I can't see in sp52. While in mypal, @XPerceniol,every now and then I throw them cookie-monsters a bone, and visit one or two external links too, so the bots can chat among them. A visit to ok-ru makes them crazy. I think one of the gg bots has the hots for me...

It still works in a vanilla (freshly installed) profile. How long, who knows.

Only 45? Gotta get me one of those :P

Nice catch. Thanks for the release :P

Hi again. Quite good speeds on ADSL): Received: xx MiB (46.44 KiB/s) Sent: xx MiB (13.19 KiB/s). As per "the incoming speed depends on the outgoing speed", yup, probably, it goes with the spirit of the project (back then, anyway). Two more questions, if I may: how do you open a second stream (for the same browser?) to increase transit speed? Second: the folder for certificates it seems, I am not using it with these new settings and version. Is that so? needs to be there. Which are the certs that HAVE to be there?

[Already said]

[wrong topic]

But it doesn't run on XP, unfortunately.

In my case I had to drop the uac override switch as well. Yeah, yeah...

They work very welll. I use https://github.com/MrS0m30n3/youtube-dl-gui, and replacing the old youtube-dl with yours works like a charm.

If your set up has the juice, e10s gives a solution to that. Such is today's internet.

Wow, Mozilla's foundation dream is finally about to become a reality. They have almost caught up with G!. Job well done. :P

Hi there. With this last version of sp52 I noticed that general.useragent.override (f.e., user_pref("general.useragent.override", "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win32; x86; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0")) doesn't stick in about:config anymore?

Hi there. What switches do you use running 360chrome directly (...\Chrome\Application\360chrome.exe --xxx) while still being able to run whatsappweb? It works without switches, but I want to limit as much the amount of stuff it loads... Thanks!

I have been using version 2.41. Upon updating to 2.42.1, i get "The procedure entry point CancelIoEx could not be located in the dynamic link library KERNEL32.dll". As previous bugs with xp, I hope it will be iron out soon. My mistake: I downloaded wrong 7z file. 2.42.1 works fine. Now back to 2.41, running your i2pd.conf settings I get "error while parsing config file: unrecognised option 'cpuext.log'" when running i2pd, crashing silently before starting the browser. My mistake again. I pasted your settings directly under the standard i2pd.conf, whose last heading is [cpuext], so the program checks your settings against it and crashes. One first solution is to overwrite with your settings. Thanks!

Yup, I have used it in the past to join services available just to a few people (for example, a building consortium, a snooker pool club forum). I know even of people that use it to share blueprints for industrial design, since they have zero trust on govs or Fb-Am-Ap-GG-MS cloud services. Silly them, he, they fear those giant, east indian company like oligopolies and spyware champions may steal their work. But i2p is indeed too slow, and i have preferred not to use the outproxy, just in case. It is another language :P. I will try your settings. Since I have only used i2pd to access specific safe places, I didn't explore it much, using the standard settings in purple/i2pd. Truly thanks. Reciprocating, and hoping to learn from someone who knows more than me, these are my about:config settings for tor-i2p in sp52. Cheers. // CUSTOM - TORI2P indications user_pref("general.useragent.compatMode.firefox", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("general.useragent.compatMode.gecko", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("general.useragent.compatMode.version", "xx"); //set, add to random agent profile, 52.0 TOR-I2P user_pref("general.useragent.override", "xx"); // add, add to random agent profile - for TOR-I2P change to "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0" user_pref("general.useragent.override.facebook.com", "xx) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0"; // add in SSS, for TOR-I2P all to "" user_pref("general.useragent.override.fbcdn.net", "xx) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0"; // add in SSS, for TOR-I2P all to "" user_pref("general.useragent.override.web.whatsapp.com","xx"; // for mypal //For useragent.override whatsapp and ggvids "xx" reset if failing), for TOR-I2P all to "" // TOR-I2P Core user_pref("network.dns.blockDotOnion", true); // default, false with TOR user_pref("javascript.enabled", true); // default, false I2P user_pref("network.proxy.socks_remote_dns", true); // set, false I2P user_pref("privacy.resistFingerprinting", false); // add, true TOR-I2P user_pref("browser.eme.ui.enabled", true); // default, false TOR-I2P DRM user_pref("canvas.poisondata", true); // set VAI-SEC, false I2P-TOR, no Mypal user_pref("layout.css.visited_links_enabled", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("dom.workers.enabled", true); // default for pinnotes (false TOR-I2P) - *-* user_pref("media.eme.apiVisible", true); // default, false TOR-I2P DRM, add Mypal user_pref("security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_camellia_128_sha", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.dhe_rsa_camellia_256_sha", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_128_sha", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.ecdhe_ecdsa_aes_256_sha", true); // set, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.ecdhe_rsa_aes_128_sha", true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.ecdhe_rsa_aes_256_sha, true); // default, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.rsa_aes_128_sha, true); // set, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.rsa_aes_256_gcm_sha384, true); //set, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.rsa_aes_256_sha, true); // set, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.rsa_aes_256_sha256, true); // set, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.rsa_camellia_128_sha", true); // set, false TOR-I2P user_pref("security.ssl3.rsa_camellia_256_sha", true); // set, false TOR-I2P

No problem like that in my place, even though a common user -perhaps even an ISP- can't really know if certain sites are blocked. I just don't care for anyone but the site I am browsing to know I am there, and I don't even want some sites to know -therefore the use of tor and such. However, ISPs -and many sites (see pm, for example)- can also detect the use of tor, and either block it or (potentially) log it and report it to either governmental or non-gov agencies, or to particular individuals in the national or international arena. And since not so many ppl use tor, once an ISP wants to do it (or is forced by agencies or individuals with the muscle to do so), they can see you are running tor, like a bright needle in the dark. Then the rest is just waiting until they find out where you are. Running behind something like shadowsocks may make that harder than it is today. In my case, I do not care about the instances when the previous paragraph becomes a reality. But it will sure take them a while, and more than a sorry a**, to know I'm just human. I don't know (or really care) if my mother would approve of my browsing behavior. I do care that petty hackers, clumsy censors, or my ISP know what I'm about. Just coz, sometimes research, and fun. Nuff said.