artenox

For example, here. (1.03 GB, 3 seeds).

Try installing the palefill extension https://github.com/martok/palefill/releases (direct link) OR enable dom.webcomponents.enabled (or dom.webcomponents.customelements.enabled) option in about:config. YouTube may break, however, but you can do it in a separate browser.

I heard information that the latest version of Telegram can be used with the One Core API on XP. But Telegram forbids dll's in its own folder, so they must be in the PATH. But kernel32.dll is always loaded from system32. In general, if you install all One Core API libraries on the system, Telegram will start. However, I don't recommend doing this. These libraries replace the system libraries. The system behavior changes, Windows language becomes partly English. It is necessary to install in a certain order. And some installer hangs on me (I checked it in virtual machine).

There were two Telegram plugins for Pidgin 2.13. An old one and a new one. The old one runs on XP, but no longer connects (it worked before). The new one (based on official library) doesn't run on XP (but maybe with One Core API?) New users have 64 bit IDs, they will not work with old clients. Telegram uses a huge number of libraries, the new Qt5. All this is impossible to compile for XP. The last hope is the One Core API. Same problem on old 32 bit Linux. The only thing left is the web version. There are two types: web.telegram.org/k and web.telegram.org/z Maybe Miranda developers will make a plugin.

You mean: a Linux computer renders sites and you connect to it remotely on XP? Is XP just showing the picture? You know (sorry for the offtops), lately users from Turkmenistan are forced to browse sites this way. But for different reason. Internet censorship in Turkmenistan has reached truly terrifying proportions. Millions of VPN IP addresses are blocked. The IP is blocked by the ISP simply if there is a lot of traffic going to it. Soon there will be no free Internet in Turkmenistan.

This is most likely a VirtualBox problem. Guest Windows Vista+ and especially Linux (and especially non-Debian based) run very slow on processors without hardware virtualization support. Guest Windows 7 and Linux in VMware run much faster. The last VMware to support XP host is 10.0.7 (but you need a 64 bit processor, even on a 32 bit XP host). The last VMware for XP for 32 bit processors (e.g. Pentium 4) is 7.1.6 (I have 7.1.4 installed). This version will allow you to run virtual Windows 7 much faster. And the best part is that (unlike VirtualBox) virtual Linux runs even the latest, 2021. I ran Rosa Fresh 12 LXQt, for example. I won't give you the links, because the application is paid. In general, modern guest systems are slow on VirtualBox, even on my Linux host. In addition, VMware 7 supports multicore even in software virtualization, unlike VirtualBox. The performance will still be bad. I just said that on very old processors VirtualBox is much slower than VMware. And VirtualBox very poorly supports guest systems newer than it. I was amazed that VMware 7 (2011) ran Linux (2021), which is impossible in VirtualBox.

That's not true. I can also say that XP is outdated crap. @D.Draker @msfntor Are you sure you're French? I thought the French were well-mannered people. The cat needs help.

In fact, there are many HTTPS proxy intermediaries (MITM proxies). And they all work on XP (at least the older versions). But the problem is that they use old system TLS libraries and are useless with modern sites on XP. For example Fiddler, HandyCache, Charles. Charles (it's in Java) uses its own TLS libraries, but it won't help old clients (new ones, yes). Basically, these applications are usable for monitoring HTTPS connections. HandyCache (Russian application) can cache and save HTTPS sites. Proxomitron Reborn also has a HTTPS log, but not very practical. They are all MITM proxies. I use Proxomitron Reborn (with Wine) and Charles on Linux. HandyCache is a partially paid application. It can decrypt HTTPS traffic for free for the first 30 minutes after each launch. You can no longer buy it, but the key exists. It is possible to create a chain of these applications. For example, I run Charles after Proxomitron.

Proxomitron Reborn on my link above supports https. It has openssl 1.0.1 libraries built in. More precisely, you need to copy the openssl libraries, generate a certificate (from the Proxomitron interface) and install it on the system and browsers. Someone on the prxbx.com forum modified the program to support https. openssl 1.0.1, so TLS 1.2 max. But there is support for upstream HTTP proxy and connection logs, filtering. @AstroSkipper I appreciate your application and your efforts. Alternatives are always a good thing.

I read the first post of this thread and I don't understand why it's so complicated? Proxomitron Reborn works, decrypts-encrypts-filters HTTPS. Yes, only TLS 1.2, but otherwise no problem.

To transfer files between Android and PC I used Linux and the MTP protocol over a USB cable. However, I created a 7z archive beforehand, because MTP is a very capricious protocol. It doesn't show some files and skips copying them. This is very frustrating when it comes to captured photos and videos. Sometimes I would transfer the archive via Bluetooth to a Nokia pushbutton (110 kbytes/sec speed), and then the Nokia would connect via USB to a PC (where the PC has full access to the FAT32 file system on the phone's memory card). But this is a very inconvenient way. More precisely: PC (USB) > Nokia (Bluetooth) > Android. Vise versa doesn't work. UPD: Once I transferred an archive from a smartphone to a tablet via Bluetooth. And then from the tablet to the Internet cloud (password protected). On PC I downloaded from the cloud.

For older browsers try this user script. Add it (text) to the greasemonkey extension. There are two inconveniences. Sometimes you need to refresh the page. And for all the links to be displayed, go to the release page.

Using a virtual machine in a virtual machine is a bad idea. Use older versions of VirtualBox to run XP.

If you want true anonymity and secrecy, you should probably use: shadowsocks > tor > shadowsocks or i2p outproxy with 2-3 nodes Although shadowsocks is optional, it is necessary so that your ISP doesn't know that you use Tor (you know that the U.S. government keeps records of such users). And you don't get banned from web sites for having a dirty IP. It is recommended to change shadowsocks servers every 30 minutes. You can find them for free in telegram channels even under XP. Paid servers cannot be completely anonymous. You will be denominated by payment and even crypto. There may be a better privacy policy than your ISP. All right, I agree. It's too paranoid. A good paid VPN would be a more acceptable compromise solution. Although, I use free VPNs and they are fast and stable enough. But I have small requirements (ADSL/3G). Such VPNs are quite difficult to find, especially with torrent support. One of them is Cloudflare WARP (Wireguard). Anonymity, yes... Maybe that's the problem there. But no one cares about me.

What's the danger of that? Punishment for using a VPN? There are only in a few countries. For example, in Saudi Arabia. Or do you mean that, for example, the Iranian police will contact VPNBook to find out what news sites the user visited? And VPNBook will answer THEM? They will not contact. They will just block that VPN (if they haven't already).