Leaderboard

StartAllBack 3.8.6

Make the tab bar invisible in Mypal 68 @tinman2000 This is the code of my self-created tabs-toolbar-invisible.css file to make the tab bar invisible in Mypal 68. This file has to be created in the mypal_profile_folder\chrome\css folder (mypal_profile_folder has to be replaced by the name of your profile folder, of course): #tabbrowser-tabs { visibility: collapse !important; } .tabs-newtab-button { display: none !important; } As you can see, it is a short code which was created and successfully tested by me in a new, clean profile. Contrary to the code you linked to, I modified only relevant IDs and classes. And just for clarification, CSS code can't really remove elements but change their appearance, i.e. in this case make them invisible. Whether this CSS stylesheet also works in a heavily customised profile, I can't say. This has to be tested by the user. If necessary, the code must be modified then. And this is how your userChrome.css file in the mypal_profile_folder\chrome folder should look like: /* Copyright (c) 2017 Haggai Nuchi Available for use under the MIT License: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT */ @import "./css/tabs-toolbar-invisible.css"; @namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul); toolbarbutton#alltabs-button { -moz-binding: url("userChrome.xml#js"); } You see the tabs-toolbar-invisible.css file has to be imported by the userChrome.css file. The advantages of this approach is the modularity of your CSS implementations and the better overview. You always know exactly which code was responsible for what and can quickly activate or deactivate certain CSS stylesheets. The deactivation of the file tabs-toolbar-invisible.css is done inside the userChrome.css file as follows: /* @import "./css/tabs-toolbar-invisible.css"; */ The requirements for use is, as already mentioned, the package MYPAL_68_CB_requirements.7z provided by me in the first post of this thread. If all done, your browser with a new, clean profile should look like this: Cheers, AstroSkipper

When using UC.JS scripts and/or CSS stylesheets, the user should not forget to clear the startup cache, especially when changes are made. This measure ensures that all modifications are applied correctly.

StartAllBack 3.8.5

@tinman2000 As your request refers to CSS browser modifications, I would like to continue our conversation here in this thread which was created by me for such purposes. So, you want to completely get rid of the tab bar for whatever reason. You linked to this CSS stylesheet https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OneJaredNewman/firefoxcss/main/userChrome.css which you wanted to use to reach your goal but it didn't work for you. TBH, this CSS stylesheet contains a lot of (unnecessary) code which is not directly related to the hiding of the tab bar. The linked code was actually meant to create a vertical tab bar for which, among other things, the horizontal tab bar had to be hidden. So, it was never meant to only hide the horizontal tab bar. If you simply use CSS code provided as it is, recommended by whomever or found by searching the Internet, you will quickly realise that it does not always work or does not correspond to what you actually wanted to achieve. Very often, CSS stylesheets are more adapted to the respective browser (and its version), a specific purpose by its creator and the changes made so far, i.e. they are more of an individual nature. Personally, I am a friend of minimal and more universal code that actually achieves the desired result. When I am back at my desktop computer, I will provide short CSS code to make the tab bar and the new tab button invisible, all that in a separate post, so that it can be found more easily later. But as I already mentioned, you should first prepare Mypal 68 so that such CSS implementations work properly. This has been described in detail in the first post of my thread under "Reqiurements for custom buttons, other script-generated objects and CSS code implementations in Mypal 68":

Thanks all. 6.0, runs on Vista, then?

Discovered the article by accident, someone knows, is this not a joke? LATEST VERSION of NoxPlayer 7.0.6.1 runs on XP!??! https://www.softpedia.com/get/Mobile-Phone-Tools/Others/Nox-APP-Player.shtml

Sweet, time to update to 3.8.6!

What attitude? He asked (and others, it seems) if it's possible to add a "feature"

That's why you need to use OEM drivers. "Throttling on all drivers from nvidia site - laptop" https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/forums/game-ready-drivers/13/292634/throttling-on-all-drivers-from-site-nvidia-laptop-/ "That's your "punishment" for buying laptops for gaming. You're fully at the mercy of the manufacturer, and rely on their driver updates, instead of being able to just use Nvidia's generic drivers and constant improvements." "You'll have to get back to whatever driver is offered for your laptop on Acer's website." "This is because the OEM manufacturer is the manufacturer of the graphics device (card); not Nvidia, which only produces the physical "chip" to these manufacturers. Vram, PCB, VRM, trace, and cooling are all designed by the OEM manufacturer; thus is considered as "proprietary" hardware. In which; has it's own thermal and power limits that can be effected with use of 3rd party (vanilla) drivers and can damage or lower the performance of the hardware. (Not to mention interfere with the unit's Optimus switching ability). The laptop model# must also be added to the supported driver ID list by Nvidia prior to the unit being supported via 3rd party vanilla drivers."

R346 Branch is the best overall, esp. for older notebooks still running Kepler. https://msfn.org/board/topic/182534-geforce-gt-710-cards-under-windows-xp-findings/?do=findComment&comment=1271374

Well, then you can't say fingerprinting for the masses is the same for you. I'm sure those who posted on github do the same (block by default), and they get fingerprinted rather differently.

There was no need to "measure" per se, what do you get under JA3 Hash and Akamai Hash?

Thank you for consistently fixing things!

USB try this driver, I have it working on my Z77 chipset on Vista. https://mega.nz/file/v7gFiALD#3WjTHP0Mx7idmuJ38SfUjkRC7epYR-3B3KTAUjQmMDo Video driver is not clear why it is not installed, I have GTX950 (PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_1402) and driver 365.19 was installed by the installer without errors. What if you unzip the driver and install the driver through device manager? Also, what is the letter of the system disk, WinNTsetup sometimes assigns a different letter than C, and because of this some programs have errors.

https://www.mediafire.com/download/dwic3yw91t2dt2j/347.90-desktop-win8-win7-winvista-64bit-international-whql.exe Or 64 https://catalog.s.download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/driver/drvs/2015/09/20777647_656fb0763425a6c8fb4ffcc1d9581604a91cf912.cab 32 https://catalog.s.download.windowsupdate.com/d/msdownload/update/driver/drvs/2015/09/20777649_230f744f753e4842d59f8f28eab607daa93ba6e7.cab

It installed on Vista, but on startup it gives the error "Unable to start virtual machine". Virtualization is enabled in BIOS, the computer meets the requirements.

1. With high probability this device handled by BIOS. There is driver that remove such devices. 2. We have EHCI controller. There is driver with forced EHCI hand-off.

Hey AstroSkipper - you are correct, sir...i.e. taking out the tab bar. How did you work your magic? My technical know-how is somewhat limited. So I bow to the master.

I don't trust they will be good, if work at all. From my long experience with nVidia drivers, those generic ones from nVidia site totally suck. One would need to use OEM drivers to get the best, besides I got a recent example. https://msfn.org/board/topic/186395-3d-video-card-not-working-windows-7-sp1-x64/

Yes! They even have the rarest laptop driver! nVidia Geforce WHQL Version 348.10 https://station-drivers.com/download/nvidia/nvidia_geforce_348.10_64(www.station-drivers.com).exe

Gut feeling?

The dude who wrote that "ad nauseam speculations" nonsense also wrote it worked in 124 (where the client hints are obviously different). The same dude requested those who deny client hints tell what it is then.

I want proof what then.

Aren't those 473, 474, 475 are simply "security fix" drivers? BTW, did you see the result? https://msfn.org/board/topic/186055-3050ti-3060ti-3070ti-and-3080ti-laptop-gpu-driver/?do=findComment&comment=1263435

Where were you when a member wasted 16 or so last pages by not calling his version.

It worked for 15 years without a problem. All started to glitch out with Thorium. But I have no documented evidence of that. Just a big, fat, huge coincidence, for now. The notebook is barely used, still has the original OS. No PoS, no updates. Toshiba Satellite with a Celeron at 1.5Ghz. What year? 2003 or so.

Thanks for reporting! I also plan to test Mypal 68.14.3b SSE on my old Athon XP 3200+ computer in the next few days. uBlock Origin 1.46 was the last compatible for FF 68. This version should hopefully still work on an SSE only machine. Higher versions also work in Mypal 68 and even the most recent version 1.58 but I checked them on an SSE2 computer. So, try to install uBlock Origin 1.58 first, and you will easily see whether this most recent version of uBO still works on your SSE only computer. If not, try uBlock Origin 1.46. At least, that's what I would do. Regarding the interface language, there are no official language packs for this browser, at least as far as I know. Only a very few made by some users, however, for older versions of Mypal 68. That means Mypal 68 is available in English only. But you can create an own language pack, of course.

First post updated in terms of Mypal 68's version history. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Those questions should be addressed to @feodor2, the developer of Mypal 68. You can do it in the Mypal 68 thread, on Codeberg.org or on GitHub.

As far as I know, the codec of AVC1 or H.264 is the same, but the formalities of the file internally have different indicators. One is a raw stream, and the other is not.

I suppose you did it through the Device manager? Cause if no, the nVidia install makes the lock.

Yes, 3070-3080 would be more future proof, besides having the drivers.