Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/22/2024 in Posts
-
StartAllBack 3.8 is major update with fully recreated taskbar. It will be necessary for August 24H2 update. It's like 70% new app. New - Shy autohide taskbar perk - Never, hide labels combine button setting - Reorder task thumbnails by drag&drop Improved - Reduced taskbar memory usage, improved responsiveness with async immersive shell startup - Pixel-perfect task icons if possible - All-new animations - Incorporated RudeWindowFixer Removed - Modern jump list with classic taskbar - Pinning to jumplist via drop on taskbar button - Auto-hide taskbar for fullscreen UWP apps Download: https://startisback.com/StartAllBack_setup.exe No translations for taskbar context menu in beta 1 Refer to alpha 1/2 threads3 points
-
@lll888 In these days, such programmes like Ports Off or Windows Worms Door Cleaner are no longer really necessary as users are usually protected by a hardware firewall in their routers and a software firewall in Windows. Generally, the user should rather first check which ports are closed or not. This could be done, for example, by the (still maintained) Nirsoft tool CurrPorts.3 points
-
I would never apply such a batch or reg file, especially if offered in the way you did. For me, they are files from dubious sources. This batch file is meant to disable services in Windows offered from a person nobody knows and who does not provide any detailed information about the reasons for the service selection inside this batch file. This is a no-go. Same applies to your recommended utilities. And then someone should also import these registration keys via reg file, again without any information and explanations. Furthermore, you did not provide any links to the homepages of their origin. Only pictures of two utilities. Sorry but ! And all this logically leads to . And by that I mean no trust in such an offer and no trust in their provider. And that's you. Sorry for the bad news!3 points
-
3 points
-
Use the X-Chromium loader. There is no version subfolder that way. Or even the PortableApps loader. Also no version subfolder. The version subfolder contents are dropped down a folder and reside in the same folder as chrome.exe and chrome_proxy.exe.2 points
-
I can tell the same yo you, keep your opinion to yourself. This is no way to start a new membership with insults towards the forum and the members.2 points
-
2 points
-
No, you confuse RTM with OEM. The ones that sold with computers are OEM. Look on their stickers. RTM can be freely purchased on a DVD,2 points
-
Yes and couple other issues (dialog element, datetime), but broken plugins unintentionally (like flash), if you really need them do not update Also this version becomes less memory hungry, removed useless eme, remote settings, copw, and undertake great javascript cleaning (kb1673553)1 point
-
Well, dynamic hiding was the first text idea but it's not clear how 'dynamic' and 'automatic' would be different. Meaning of 'dynamic' would be 'aware of adjacent windows'1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
Quick question. Will I have to disable auto updates via the registry? Or will it be one of those ones that sits in the updates waiting for me to allow it? Also, for Tihiy, will you be trying to put the classic menus that microsoft removes into your mod? Or are we going to have to stay on 23H2 forever?1 point
-
@dmiranda Just set the name of the folder as a variable: FOR /f "tokens=*" %%a in ('DIR "yourpathto\Chrome\1*" /a:d /b') do SET FOLDER=%%a ECHO %FOLDER% Regards1 point
-
Within Task Manager -> Processes/Details Tab You can match the PID against the result of the second netstat command above, you can then find the image name/end the1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
New versions, regular AND a SSE version https://codeberg.org/Theodor2/Mypal68/releases/tag/68.14.3b1 point
-
one other way is saying that you dont understand, in case you really dont understand, simple then no problem IDA re wrote a lot into that direction but actually i readed it up , he actually writes like he know stuff but he provided like absolut zero to proof if he even is that guy he describes to be for example he presented not a single line of code, and assembly only for code optimation ? sounds a bit fishy to me the story keeps ongoing like that where people kinda reacted like to smell something fishy too if he trys to create a mess i dont fall for a such trick one more things women are of "feeling" nature therefore they more likely to fall for something that falls into that category1 point
-
1 point
-
You misunderstood me, I repair computers, not only their hardware, but also reinstall the OS, virus removal, recovery, and so on. You just don't understand how a restore point works. It restores files and registry entries as they were when it was created, so the OS at the time the restore point was created = the OS after the restore. Of course, if the OS has a lot of bugs, it's easier to reinstall, they accumulate gradually and usually restore points don't last that long. But if something breaks a well working system, a quick rollback is best. For example, the wrong driver can cause a BSOD, safe mode doesn't always work, and rolling back from a point will quickly and correctly remove that driver.1 point
-
1 point
-
I already guessed where you're from , no need to write further. I'm sorry, I can't take assurances from a random user on the internet, also my preference, especially when Windows itself has that functionality.1 point
-
1 point
-
From my humble 30 years experience with browsers, one's gotta try several versions released in the timeframe of about 3 months back and forth of the given browser version release.1 point
-
Issue #32815 is fixed, so youtube-dl should work for you again.1 point
-
That's an American "invention", all of my Siemens (later branded as just Fujitsu, made in Germany) computers (desktops and laptops) came with physical media. LOVE THAT! The tradition went on even with Win 7, not sure about 8 and later.1 point
-
Basically any version without SP would do.1 point
-
Photos https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=Windows+98+OEM1 point
-
On my system, the 360Chrome 11.0.2031 worked really well. The version 13.5.1030 rebuild 7 worked relatively well but only when the chrome.dll was rebased. The site loading times were much worse than in version 11.0.2031. In contrast, Thorium doesn't need to be re-based by the user and consumes much less RAM than normal Chrome versions. The standard loading behaviour is an other history, unfortunately. However, this browser was never made for my old system, either. But as I already mentioned, I found a convenient way for me to let websites loading much faster. More about this soon!1 point
-
Thorium actually starts relatively fast compared to other Chrome browsers under Windows XP, even on low-performance hardware like mine. Of course, it has first to be configured well.1 point
-
Your results? I've tested this flag and NONE of the SEVERAL quantifiable measurements (ie, the only real way to truly eliminate Placebo Effect) shows any "considerable" performance difference. Sorry, you have to be a bit patient. I am testing so much and can't say anything qualified about one single flag. Too much flags here and too much other performance settings to identify the effects of a single flag.1 point
-
1 point
-
Here is a brief report of my testing so far if someone is interested. Thorium can actually be installed on such an old computer under Windows XP. The browser starts up still quite bearable compared to other browsers on my system. However, as always with Chrome browsers on low-performance computers under Windows, the page loading behaviour is problematic. Although I have configured all conceivable flags to increase performance and selected the settings to suit my hardware, loading web pages takes considerably much longer than with New Moon, Serpent or Mypal. Of course, websites can be loaded that no longer function properly in the already mentioned browsers. Surprisingly, RAM consumption is not a problem, it is rather perfect although Thorium is running in multi-process mode. Interestingly, it seems that I have even found a solution for my installation that considerably speeds up the loading of web pages and therefore the browser start, too. It's not a new one, though. One doesn't have to reinvent the wheel, either. But first, this method must still be thoroughly tested.1 point
-
I was going to suggest that one also but it's not in v114 and I cannot access Thorium or Supermium at work. Yep! This one did the trick. No more entries in my firewall log. I just found this by accident, and its description made me prick up my ears:1 point
-
No. It is indeed Thorium trying to connect to this address. To be more precise it is the process thorium.exe. Disabling the flag #media-route-dial-provider seems to be the solution I found by checking all available Thorium flags.1 point
-
No. It is indeed Thorium trying to connect to this address. To be more precise it is the process thorium.exe.1 point
-
I told you many times about 1030 being superior. What can I say, we all learn something, I guess, I spent several years before I found the right driver for me, But hey, no one stops you from those topics getting deleted.1 point
-
I use 13.5.1030, and the fonts look very good, maybe 13.5.2044 isn't for your system after all. The fonts look like here. The settings I use is in the image I already sent (here). Sorry, can't send BMP - the limit is up.1 point
-
anti-aliasing gamma korrektur = aus1 point
-
Every video driver renders fonts differently. I'd start with searching the right one for you. It's a long path of trial and error.1 point
-
So I replaced the card and it's all the same. I think ( a hunch ) the cheaper (lower numbered) ones aren't as good as the top of the line . Binning process ? Anyways, it works, the only problem is the awful colour representation, @win32, I don't have any driver conflicts , like you discribed earlier, what driver would you suggest me to mod ? Thanks.1 point
-
Well , thanks, I'm gonna replace it then, after the weekend is over.1 point
-
Well, I unpacked the GT1030 and tried it ... well to say I'm not satisfied - is to simply say nothing. The picture has purplish (reddish) tint , like on the American NTSC standard with purple faces, like on VHS/DVDs. Is it supposed to be this way ? I don't know. The 10-bit colour setting doesn't work, it leads to a blank balck screen.1 point
-
@win32, hi, so I bought that pile of garbage we were discussing a while back, I mean G1030, it was on pre New Year sale. So now I can test Pascal drivers, would you be interested to join ? I'll not be mad if not, 'cause I bought it only out of boredom, just for fun. I chose the fastest SC version with GDDR5. If one could call that thing "fastest". xD I mean compared to the usual GT1030 with GDDR4 memory.1 point
-
The list of supported devices is in the topic. EDIT: But you may try , of course.1 point