Leaderboard

Seems they have restored a backup from monday.

Maybe, you try for example the extension KeePassXC-Browser in version 1.8.5.1 for Firefox 67 and up instead of the more recent ones for Firefox 96 and up. Reducing the minimum Firefox requirements inside webextensions rarely works.

This is a unique UA. For quite some time, Chrome defaults to a WIn10 UA only.

i recently try make "generic" usb a/v driver, using wdmex and sys files from XP ... i test videocapture with cheap chinese endoscope (de-facto usb cam). its work with Amcap test app. i test sound playing and recording with cheap chinese usb soundcard. its work even in web browser Mypal. anyone want test? password 1 (protection from stupid antiviruses).

Thank you for the confirmation, Jody, very much appreciated.

It's actually gone. His XP based page for downloads is still there. But he shut down his forum nearly a year ago.

Oh, I see, thanks

I just created an account over there too. Well, at least we're not stranded without RyanVM's forum.

You're very welcome and the only other place I saw status update is https://board.eclipse.cx/viewtopic.php?t=554&sid=b765a2d99c75aae621d1bd3e3e058ff4 But I'm unable to log in over there (I tried several time)

Thank you. I have an old account there, so that's where I'll check. Thanks!

HI Jody, how are you managing during this holiday season, I hope well. I was posting over at: https://www.xpforums.com/ https://www.xpforums.com/threads/arcticfoxie-notheretoplaygames-360chrome-v13-5.934711/page-6 I hope that answered your question. Have a merry Christmas and happy new year if we don't hear from you sooner. Sal

TBH, I personally am completely satisfied with Kee. And KeePass also works well without Kee if you only retrieve previously saved login data. I never tried the combination of KeePassXC-Browser and KeePassNatMsg. But thanks for the insights when trying to fix the code! BTW, I avoid all webextensions which need an additional exe file in Windows due to their restrictions in Chrome/Firefox/Mypal 68. I don't like that at all.

Stating the duration of a custom scan without the amount of files examined is unfortunately completely meaningless. 11 min for 1 GB, 11 min for 10 GB, or 11 min for 100 GB would lead to completely different evaluations. Anyway! Thanks for your good intentions!

That's really nice of you to say, but what good are these screenshots going to do me? As I said, I installed RogueKiller on my computer many months ago. I know the interface very well, and your screenshots are unfortunately pretty meaningless without additional information. Much more important would be experience in using RogueKiller, information about the version you are using (portable or not, premium or free), your operating system, RAM and CPU utilisation, when RogueKiller is running, in terms of possible loss of performance, and in any case, to list both positive and negative points.

Of course, I have been using KeePass for many years and still do so in these days. In Mypal 68, I use the extension Kee (formerly KeeFox). It does its job as advertised. Here is a link: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/keefox/

I also don't use "Real Time" AV (I don't even use DEP on my machines) and I test with Malwarebytes and Rogue Killer, but rarely do I bother much anymore either as I don't do anything sensitive on my age old machines. BTW @dmiranda do you mind if I react and quote your postings here anymore? I appreciated that you were one of a few to welcome me back here. I just want to make sure I'm in intruding or making anyone uncomfortable but my presence here. Have a good one.

Athough your post is actually quite off-topic in my thread about Mypal 68 , I can't agree with your judgement of Serpent. The CTR extension, which is available in a special version for Serpent, works perfectly and transforms a lot in this browser as it used to be. And of course, there is also the possibility to change the look and functionality of Serpent considerably via userChrome.css or scripts. Not to mention the many other extensions that exist for this browser.

The default search engines are inside the second omni.ja file in the subfolder browser. The exact location in this special archive file is chrome/browser/search-extensions. From there, Mypal 68 can restore its default search engines if necessary.

Are those valid for Brave merchandise API?

I read your statement again. Now, I think I have understood what you have done. You deleted one or more of the four search engines Brave, Qwant, DuckDuckGo and Mojeek in the file search.json.mozlz4, with which Mypal 68.13.7b is now delivered by @feodor2 as default, by using the extension mozlz4-edit. That doesn't work, of course. The easiest way to get rid of them is removing them in the Options dialogue of Mypal 68. If you do so, they will remain hidden until you restore the default settings one day.

Hello everyone! I want to create a community for the development of software and drivers for Windows 2000. Please join us if you're interested! Server link : https://discord.gg/EFGR9BKm3U

I can't confirm any crashes or problems after editing the file search.json.mozlz4 using the extension mozlz4-edit. What I have edited remains the same no matter how often I restart Mypal 68. Actually, there is no need to add anything to the profile when launching. If so, your installation or your profile is presumably faulty. But keeping backups is always a good idea.

Overall, I agree with you, still with an SSD XP will be even more responsive, if properly configured. Win7 does way too many reads-writes, especially at startup, also agree.

Thanks for testing and reporting! Unfortunately, you tested it under Windows Vista. However, this thread is targeting Windows XP exclusively. Under Windows XP, Wise Anti Malware does not work anymore and must be considered abandoned. Although off-topic, I would be interested to know when the last virus definitions were that you loaded under Windows Vista. This cannot be determined from your pictures.

There's simply not enough trouble free and fast file hostings.

@dmiranda The solution to let the custom button aboutbutton recognise by the CSS stylesheet buttons_on_navbar_button_roundness.css is a bit more complicated than I thought. You have indeed to change the code of the script aboutbutton.uc.js. It seems to be a class issue. This is the first part of the original script code from line 1 to 26: (function() { if (location != 'chrome://browser/content/browser.xul') return; try { CustomizableUI.createWidget({ id: 'about-toolbarbutton', type: 'custom', defaultArea: CustomizableUI.AREA_NAVBAR, onBuild: function(aDocument) { var toolbaritem = aDocument.createElementNS('http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul', 'toolbarbutton'); var attrs = { id: 'about-toolbarbutton', class: 'chromeclass-toolbar-additional', type: 'menu', removable: true, label: 'about Seiten öffnen', tooltiptext: 'about Seiten öffnen' }; for (var a in attrs) toolbaritem.setAttribute(a, attrs[a]); return toolbaritem; } }); } catch(e) { }; I changed the class of this button in line 15 from 'chromeclass-toolbar-additional' to 'toolbarbutton-1 chromeclass-toolbar-additional': (function() { if (location != 'chrome://browser/content/browser.xul') return; try { CustomizableUI.createWidget({ id: 'about-toolbarbutton', type: 'custom', defaultArea: CustomizableUI.AREA_NAVBAR, onBuild: function(aDocument) { var toolbaritem = aDocument.createElementNS('http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul', 'toolbarbutton'); var attrs = { id: 'about-toolbarbutton', class: 'toolbarbutton-1 chromeclass-toolbar-additional', type: 'menu', removable: true, label: 'about Seiten öffnen', tooltiptext: 'about Seiten öffnen' }; for (var a in attrs) toolbaritem.setAttribute(a, attrs[a]); return toolbaritem; } }); } catch(e) { }; This change seems to be enough to let the CSS stylesheet buttons_on_navbar_button_roundness.css recognise the custom button aboutbuttuon as a standard toolbar button. Thus, the button can be rounded by this CSS stylesheet. Here is a screenshot to show the result of my change (I added borders around the buttons via CSS code for better visibility ): The positive side effect of this modification is that the custom button aboutbuttuon behaves as a normal toolbar button from now on, even if it is not rounded off by such a CSS stylesheet. Cheers, AstroSkipper

I own GTX 780 Ti, more than enough for me, but 3GB of memory seems on the low end, so better go with at least Titan 6GB.

"Looking ahead: Manifest v3" "In 2019 we will introduce the next extensions manifest version. Manifest v3 will entail additional platform changes..." https://blog.chromium.org/2018/10/trustworthy-chrome-extensions-by-default.html

I'm 100% certain, 1030 did update my uBlock 1.36 to 1.43 or 1.42 (quite some time ago). I can't say anything about 2044, sorry.

Simply add this command line flag. --enable-features=ExtensionManifestV2Availability It will work for now, when they remove it, no one knows.

Thank you all, the issue is no more, thanks to @Dixel and his driver 348.12! NVIDIA System Information report created on: 11/16/2023 11:13:14 System name: KARLA-PC [Display] Operating System: Windows Vista (TM) Business, 64-bit (Service Pack 2) DirectX version: 11.0 GPU processor: GeForce GTX 780 Ti Driver version: 348.12 Direct3D API version: 11 Direct3D feature level: 11_0 CUDA Cores: 2880 Core clock: 875 MHz Memory data rate: 7000 MHz Memory interface: 384-bit Memory bandwidth: 336.00 GB/s Total available graphics memory: 6968 MB Dedicated video memory: 3072 MB GDDR5 System video memory: 0 MB Shared system memory: 7695 MB Video BIOS version: 80.80.34.00.2A IRQ: Not Used Bus: PCI Express x16 Gen3 Device ID: 10DE 100A 19DA 1314 Part Number: 2083 0030 [Components] nvui.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdsync.exe 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdplcy.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdbat.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvxdapix.dll 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component NVCPL.DLL 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA User Experience Driver Component nvCplUIR.dll 8.1.820.0 NVIDIA Control Panel nvCplUI.exe 8.1.820.0 NVIDIA Control Panel nvViTvSR.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Video Server nvViTvS.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Video Server nvDispSR.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Display Server NVMCTRAY.DLL 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA Media Center Library nvDispS.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA Display Server PhysX 09.15.0428 NVIDIA PhysX NVCUDA.DLL 8.17.13.4812 NVIDIA CUDA 7.0.41 driver nvGameSR.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA 3D Settings Server nvGameS.dll 6.14.13.4812 NVIDIA 3D Settings Server

Thank you! The colours look like they simply don't have enough shades, whereas my old cars has rich colours, for example: blue is a simple plain blue. I'd make a screenshot, but all those screen capturing programmes won't show much difference. I'm fond of cosmetics and it's very important for me to see the lipstick shades. I put the old card back, all is fine again. No gradients at all, with the both cards.

Thank you! And which driver you'd suggest? (OS Vista x64)

Congrats and wishes to stay even longer! It's very hard for me to even imagine such a long period of time (((due to my own age))).

@Cocodile, since you seem to be the only one trying to help me find Brave, may I trouble you for the advice on safe Chromium for Windows 7? As I already pointed out, something similar to Ungoogled.

Thank you very much, but I wouldn't know what to do with it). Maybe some third party entities make builds based on Brave?

Thank you for the detailed explanation!

In that case, please help me find ready builds of Brave, thank you very much.

I too have this question! It seems odd. First they write they stay on older OS to be less spied on, second they port the standard Chrome/chromium, really odd.

I found the problematic script which causes this, tagging @win32, since he also might be interested! It's just yet another bug in Chromium 111. "Can confirm the crash at settings." https://github.com/ungoogled-software/ungoogled-chromium/pull/2262

I'm sure it's a good decision, we'll see how far it will help. I remember it all went downhill very quickly after 110 (which can be ported to windows 7 and Vista). I think things will get real ugly after or even in 120. I don't want this to be a prediction, there are people who are obviously not that happy when my predictions become true. By that time, I hope you will make a new topic about the "Future of Chrome on Windows 10".

Yes they did, I predicted about Win 7 (which is the topic here!) and 8, 8.1 (which is the topic's subject in the thread I made my predictions).

jaclaz, I'm afraid I have to disagree about the term "generic", some time ago I was asked a specific question, I clearly predicted it about the memory function. Not just , "hey, guys, I know Chrome will soon not work". I think you're confusing me with someone else. Regards, Dixel.

They suggest to run chrome exe in Vista compatibility, tick the checkbox for Run this program in compatibility mode for, select Windows Vista from the drop-down menu, and then click OK https://windowsreport.com/chrome-white-screen/

@win32, as I don't have a github acc., answering the question "Why does Geforce Now claim this Browser is unsupported?" here. Try to completely disable ClientHints, not to spoof them, as I was able to use Geforce Now on an old Chrome 106, spoofed as 111 via my app. I got no unsupported warnings.

Perhaps it needs a dedicated topic here? I'm pretty positive most don't even have github accounts to ask questions.

1 - I want to give a hint to use dev. builds with Metrics And Crash Sampling disabled. Goto: chrome://version/ scroll to the bottom and see: Active Variations : MetricsAndCrashSampling:OutOfReportingSample 2 - The perfect solution for this chrome not being able to use H264 videos is to redirect it to the installed system codecs. It would be perfectly legal since, for example, K-Lite is free. EDIT : under chrome://gpu says it can't load msmpeg2vdec.dl

115.0.5760.0 R2 Feedback : All of the issues with dark theme - fixed ! Millions of Crashpads in the Crashpad are no more (only one small, like it supposed to be). Sandbox - fixed. The browser is flawless. Though, I'll still be dreaming of the undoodled port. Even though it is a bit older (always).

I just tried and it works - only if I use the extended list of my flags + the famous NO sanbox. But works very good, I mean, it starts faster than its counterparts. Other than that, I had no time to fully test. EDIT: But I'm sure it's good because it was made by win32 (c).

This maybe: It's nice, it gives you Hardware IDs and also lets you uninstall old devices without needing to go in safe mode. It was bundled with some HP printer drivers. You can get it here for example. Other than that and what's in the other thread I also know these: They are both from Microsoft and I don't quite remember where I found them, some free to download hardware development packages from MS for sure but that's all I know. Not sure if it's appropriate uploading them