Leaderboard

Win XP had a choice of colours, there were two other themes, not only your favourite blue theme - olive green colour and the acid silver colour themes.

I agree with you, anything less than 6GB makes no sense. The question is, will he ever need a Titan XP, I mean no guarantee we'll see the latest ported drivers. I'd still go with it.

Anyways, the Titan line is still the King! Go Titan XP.

Yes, I can, in fact @Dixel already did. [link] But if you still insist, please go to chrome://version/ and post the screenshot from there.

Could be due to the fact there was a problem with secure DNS functioning in Supermium, reported on github. @UCyborg, try to replicate the error with or without secure DNS.

@legacyfan! Have a look here: Old, offline Root Certificate Updater, all created by myself, you will find here in the section 11.1. Archived Downloads {obsolete}: In this main article, you will also find recent, online and offline Root Certificate Updater in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates.

I thought this deserved its own thread, as opposed to hijacking the supermium thread. I'm posting from this browser right now on my XP machine with discord, ESPN, and youtube open, and haven't experienced any crashes or bizarre bugs yet. I'm a bit disappointed that we don't have access to the source code, though. https://github.com/weolar/xpchrome

I only witnessed the standard 20-30 connections to Google IP Addresses that all Chromium Forks make unless "ungoogled'. Primarily 172.217.x.y and 142.25(0|1).x.y. Also saw a 34.104.x.y in the list, not sure I've seen that one in other Chromium Forks, possibly tied to "DNS Protection" which is just another way of saying "give us your DNS records instead of giving them to your ISP".

BTW, the user agent override looks redundant.

... As I have explained already, without blocking those "browser-detect" discourse scripts, you won't be able to get this working; what is the "less complex" type of adblock that you currently use (because I can't believe there exist people "here" browsing the web of 2023 without any type of adblock) ? FWIW, you can always use a new St52 profile with just uBO (or other script blocker), specifically for Discourse-based forums (in any case, you can at least try this to verify my solution really works ) ... PS: It is my experience that content blockers do not slow down browsers, at least not to a perceivable extent (unless, ofc, you load too many filter lists in them); blocking all those third-party resources, i.e. scripts (especially miners), ad video, ad images, etc., results in quicker page loads and reduced bandwidth usage, if anything - YMMV, ofc ... PS2: Are you familiar with the English adage "You can't have your cake and eat it, too" ? You come here and ask for solution to a problem, an offered, proven, one involves slightly modifying "your" workflow (i.e. employing a script blocker), with minimal or zero risks, yet you remain reluctant to apply the proposed solution - while I do indeed respect your choices, often times the key to success is simple compromises ...

There are no quotes under chrome://version/ on his screenshot, why did you ignore the most important subject, I wonder? I'll answer, it's because Chrome doesn't need them. Whatever outdated info he passed to the chrome executable, chrome seems to be correcting it. Outdated, hence the keyword "archived article" he used. I couldn't have been able to port new browsers or anything to Vista if I hadn't knew it, so him calling me a doctor might have been an exaggeration, but overall he's right, I know "a bit" more about Chrome. With the current state of things on the forum, where people simply can't support normal discussion, I'm going to limit my free support, I already cancelled my ported Opera project, no more posting of modded nVidia drivers either.

@j7n: UXP-based browsers have all the necessary mechanics (I'd say 99.9% of them) to properly display ALL discourse-based forums; the real issue is discourse's stupid/overzealous browser-feature sniffing scripts, which are BLOCKING the UXP-based browsers because they can't detect support for certain features (no doubt present in recent Chromium/Firefox) which are not indispensable for these forums to function as expected... My own solution in St52 since months ago involves: 1. A SSUAO for discourse-based assets (not even sure this is still needed today): general.useragent.override.discourse-cdn.com;Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:115.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0 2. Blocking those overzealous scripts in your content blocker of choice ; I simply use uBlock Origin "legacy" and in the "My Filters" tab I've added this filter: ! Discourse-based forums ||*/assets/browser-detect-$script,important After that, ALL discourse-based forums display correctly (and this includes vertical scrolling ), e.g. : https://forums.docker.com/c/docker-desktop-for-windows/48

It will work, but you won't be able to have many tabs open concurrently. The 4 tabs I had open were using roughly 2.5 GB of RAM.

I'm a bit concerned that the author has this note -- "valid for one year"

I am well aware, I wasn't born yesterday, lol. I'm actually planning six different Win10 color choices. I call them Win10 because the title bar (and min/max/close/restore icons) is (are) "flat" where XP's title bar (and min/max/close/restore icons) is (are) "rounded". My RGB / HTML color combos are below. I figure SIX is more than enough for members to grab one that suits them. No timeline, they will be done when they are done. The color combos are basically being defined "for me". Official Ungoogled Chromium does NOT use Win10's "inactive title bar" color (Win10 defaults to white [Light App Mode]), but selects its own "inactive" color based on 'masking' the "active" color. Once an "active" color is manually defined (registy entry also provided for reference), it is Official Ungoogled Chromium revealing the other colors used in my skins, I don't just pluck them out of thin air, lol. Blue 0 99 177 = #0063B1 72 143 199 = #488FC7 26 115 232 = #1A73E8 Olive Green 112 130 56 = #708238 153 166 133 = #99A685 232 113 10 = #E8710A Metallic Silver 170 169 173 = #AAA9AD 194 193 196 = #C2C1C4 128 134 139 = #80868B Iron Gray 82 89 93 = #52595D 131 136 139 = #83888B 128 134 139 = #80868B Bronze 177 86 15 = #B1560F 199 134 83 = #C78653 176 96 0 = #B06000 Brick Red 170 74 68 = #AA4A44 194 125 121 = #C27D79 217 48 37 = #D93025 [HKEY_CURRENT_USER\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\DWM] "AccentColor"=dword:ffb16300 "AccentColorInactive"=dword:ffc78f48 Note that Win10's registry uses BGR instead of RGB and the first two letters define the "mask" (typically ff for Light App Mode and 00 for Dark App Mode). I've not yet experimented with "masking" 'in the middle' for a skin that works well in Light App Mode and Dark App Mode.

I'll maybe revisit Supermium in the future again, but the last 115 I tried, secure DNS behaved just like in 360 Chrome, meaning not working at all.

@XPerceniol, maybe better not to look up for that topic at all, in case you haven't seen it, might be damaging to your nerves.

Thank you! Of course you know better.

Oh, don't worry - it's fine, I appreciate your reply! About the likes, it had been said in the site news, Tripredacus had drastically reduced the number of likes you can give, I think it's now only 9 per day, I don't remember exactly. And I'm not sure I follow the reason.

Then could it be the thing that HD sound is also broken on win11, since the developer is fixated mostly on win10? I read reports of the sound troubles on 11, too.

@XPerceniol, please accept my cordial greetings and best wishes for the recovery!

MPC-BE - in this day and age still having troubles with sound, for example DTS-HD MA and TrueHD or even DD+, whereas MPC-HC doesn't, I can use MPC-HC with my receiver.

Every Nvidia card with a BIOS newer than Sep 2013 will have a seriously boosted brightness! The plonkers started to parrot the always overbright AMD to boost the sales, would be my guess. Keep that in mind.

Well, people on github wrote 115 was more stable. I didn't notice font issues. I keep remote fonts blocked, though ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS seems like a serious issue, did you report on github?

Very strange, did you try my 378.78 modded driver?

Hi! The title is wrong, no such thing as "GTX Titan X Pascal" exists, however, there's GTX Titan XP, I own one GTX Titan X, it runs hot, noisy, no huge difference between it and the Black one, except the VRAM amount, I shouldn't advise GTX Titan X to the worst enemy, stay away. 1080Ti runs well with my 378.78 modded driver. But yeah, like Dixel said, the picture is acid.

The code hasn't, but you confuse policies with command line flags. Quotes aren't needed in the latter case.

Yeah, been rough to say the very least and my typing is still quite shaky but I'm healing slowly. Thank you ... Sal

Which version of the browser did you test? Thanks.

Simply add this command line flag. --enable-features=ExtensionManifestV2Availability It will work for now, when they remove it, no one knows.

I already posted the meaning of the error code 0x800706B5: Check if there are problems in your system with the event log service! @WSC4 As far as I understand your error code, the service BITS fails to start because the Eventlog service is not running. Check both services! Are they set to start automatically (auto)? BITS is definitely needed for MU/WU and has to be working correctly. And keep in mind, my guide was generally written for Windows XP Professional SP3 32-bit. But there were members like, for example, @maile3241 who got MU/WU running under Windows XP 64-bit using ProxHTTPSProxyMII 1.3a in the past. Whether it is still working in these days or not, I really don't know. If you can't fix it and all fails, you should give another method a try.

Simply switch the browser to "developer" mode, it works in supermium (which this topic is about). Should work in others.

First, I wanted to say "I do not use" but then I decided to write "I don't use". Just a leftover. Thanks for the hint!

You know I don't use Vista and never did before. Therefore, I don't know any details about compatibility with other OSes than Windows XP. And there was no real need for me to try it under Windows 7 or up. Anyway! Thanks for clarification! And happy Thursday evening to you, too!

And congrats to your developed Vista SP2 x86 targeting edition of ProxyMII! However, I thought @cmalex's ProxyMII version would also run under Vista.

genieautravail, please check if there is BSOD in this configuration layers.enable-tiles - false layers.omtp.enabled - true layers.enable-tiles-if-skia-pomtp - false

FYI, I checked the root cerificates for updates and noticed this: At first glance, it looks like the disallowedcert.sst (revoked certificates) file has been updated. I downloaded it and compared it with the previous version. The contents of the two files are the same. The only thing that has been changed is the file date and timestamp on the server. So, nothing new in the West. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Web server can send whatever it wants regardless of what that header says. You'd have to disable WebP decoding functionality inside the browser, which in case of Chromium based browsers probably means analyzing the disassembled code and altering it so decoding routines don't run. Unless you have the source code which it's compiled from, in that case it could be done without hacking the binaries.

Although a little off-topic, the joke of the whole story is that OnlyFans runs much faster and better in New Moon 28 than in 360Chrome on my old Windows XP computer. And I mean that natively without ProxHTTPSProxy.

Fast work on old PC (without DirectX 10+ graphics card), Firefox 113, win7 gfx.webrender.all - false gfx.webrender.enabled - false gfx.webrender.unaccelerated-widget.force - true layers.gpu-process.force-enabled - true widget.non-native-theme.webrender - false dom.ipc.processCount - 1 layers.async-pan-zoom.enabled - false fission.autostart - false security.sandbox.gpu.level - 0 general.smoothScroll - false

Update notification! Both versions of my Root Certificate and Revoked Certificate Updater for offline use have been updated and are now of 04/25/2023. You can find them in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates in the first post of this thread. Cheers, AstroSkipper

Update notification! The Root Certificates have been updated and are now from 25-04-2023. Here is a screenshot: Therefore, my self-created, offline Root Certificate Updaters in the section 11.2.4. Downloads related to Root Certificate Updates (in the first post of this thread) will also be updated as soon as possible. Cheers, AstroSkipper

FYI: And that means information about our TLS proxies and certificates can be easily found in my main article and in this thread without any problems in seconds. Kind regards, AstroSkipper

Cheers, AstroSkipper