Leaderboard

I definitely noticed it on my end. The JavaScript feels smoother in more recent releases of New Moon...not sure if there's been some code optimization but anything that can be done to enhance the JS speed is always welcome. (Of course, with JS turned off all New Moon releases I've tried are lightning fast, but there are precious few sites now that don't use it.) Up until very recently I noticed I still needed to install Palefill--this seems to have changed (and it is nice to have WebComponents enabled!) but as Ramon said, I think it is better to download Palefill anyway as a precautionary measure. Things can & do happen.

for me those chevrons only appear when the chrome window size is set to 800 x 600. that applies for 13.5.2022 and 13.5.2036.

Chevrons = the button with the two "greater than" symbols at the right end of the extension toolbar, which opens the extension overflow menu that appears if there are more extension buttons than will fit on the toolbar.

1. Pages that do not load: https://przedszkolowo.pl https://www.astraweb.com balls move while waiting to load, but nothing happens. 2. https://mapy.geoportal.gov.pl/ address search window does not load SEARCHES->Address search No problem loading the address search window mypal browser v 68.12.3 https://www.mypal-browser.org/download.html

I can't believe I just realised why there is an X in SpaceX.

WinRAR is not needed to install an extension. Do not uncompress the .crx, drag-and-drop the .crx AS-IS onto your extensions page - chrome://extensions/

Bingo! If you have ever completed a "captcha" on that computer, then it has been fingerprinted and "databased" and you are wasting your time and resources to try to "un-fingerprint". edit: "captcha" = Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart

Welcome to MSFN, @adata! https://www.astraweb.com - this link works good in MiniBrowser, and 360Chrome 13.5.2022, 360Chrome 13.5.1030 r6 to r8.... but does NOT work in 360Chrome 13.5.2036r1rb2 (=beta2) and 360Chrome 13.5.2036r1rb3 (=beta3), and DCBrowser... EDIT: Works fine in 360Chrome 13.5.2036r1rb2 (=beta2) and 360Chrome 13.5.2036r1rb3 (=beta3), and DCBrowser... My previous not working state was caused by my "Referer Control" extension, blocking the referer, sorry! So our ALL chrome forks work. https://przedszkolowo.pl - this one works in all 360Chrome builds and MiniBrowser.... but does not work in DCBrowser... These two links does not work in our Firefox based forks...

With version 3.6.3.4670 Start_ShowNetConn no longer fits in any style:

Nor would I expect it to. Screen resolution is but ONE variable out of HUNDREDS. And it depends on which of those variables is being used to "fingerprint" you. If you send a User Agent that tells the world you run XP x86 SP2 when 99% of folks on XP x86 run SP3 and not SP2, then of course you are "unique". If you think about it, being "unique" is *NOT* the result you want if you are trying to "not be fingerprinted". Being UNIQUE is BAD - you have been fingerprinted and they know EXACTLY who you are, you are "unique".

You once mentioned that you do not run your browser window "maximized" because you feel it is a privacy vulnerability, so what window size do you run? Because it is that smaller window size that prompts the chevrons, in all versions of 360Chrome (I tested in several versions all the way back to v11 now that I know what you are talking about - a screencap at the very beginning would have been extremely helpful). Running a MAXIMIZED window is actually LESS of a privacy vulnerability - because then your fingerprint on screen size is a needle in a haystack, you blend in with everybody with the same monitor resolution. Running in a smaller window makes you stand out like a sore thumb because you become the only person on the planet running that window size.

See what picture Elon Musk posted recently, like this! Here:

palefill becomes indeed mostly useless with the latest browsers based on the latest UXP versions, this also includes IceApe-UXP and BNavigator and the main stream Pale Moon and Basilisk. I would still suggest you keep it in simply disabled in your Add on list so that you can re-enable quickly it in case something stops working.

I can run facebook, three yt (everytime yt is loaded, ram use goes up like crazy, but it goes down quite fast too) and linkedin in yout last 360 mod, while running 5-6 tabs in SP52. Very strong.

It was indeed a silly mistake. I downloaded the first 11.0.2251.0 file, instead of 13.0.2310.0 None of the issues I pointed out appear in 12.0.2310. 11.0.2251.0, no surprise, was the issue with these social media. Obviously, then, newer versions in my setup, and with your modded 360 make a difference. My apologies, @Humming Owl. Will report back as I test more thoroughly. Thanks!

I must admit - last version of New Moon 28.10.6a1.win32-git-2023-04-07 seems much faster then previous versions. Does anybody else notice that? Even huff-post loads faster. Also as i understand with latest versions of NM\Basilisk we don't need Palefill add-on, because we have WebComponents enabled, am i correct?

It was indeed designed for a totally different browser concept in mind - The one of a minimalist browser without much customization features and which basically is similar to the Chromium model in many ways. Everything old... the old UI and it's customization features, add-ons and themes stood in the way of Mozilla to make a Chrome clone without actually being Chrome - and being able to appeal that way to all the Chrome users (and we already know that backfired MASSIVELY )

Still NO CLUE of what you are talking about. There is no new feature. Can you share a screencap so the rest of us know what in Hades you are talking about?

@MathwizIt may be true that newer multi-process code is written in Rust, as it was perfected in much later Firefox code bases. But UXP - has in comparison to later Firefox code bases - very few of that inside, it may work, but it is far from being perfect - What i meant is this: It would be a much more complex task to try to bring 100% stable and grown up multi-process code into UXP as in comparison to "just implementing" Google Webcomponents. So whatever for a degree of Rust code was in the Firefox 52 code-base - it is useless cruft - as there is none who could succeed with a task as big like that, so as long as nobody qualified is around who could handle all the dependencies and the tons of bugs which brings multi-process along my comments stay valid

I do not see why multi-process could not be implemented properly in C++ or even in plain C. What does make Rust necessary to implement multi-processing? I have been programming only in C/C++ plus a few other languages, I only recently got interested into Rust and from what I see it is a kind of better C++ but with an extremely strict memory model (when compared to C), so everything is more difficult to do but can lead to less errors in the end. It s a shame there are not many compilers yet, you only got the main rustc implementation and the mrustc implementation. I think that when you will get the gcc team develop an alternate implementation you will have a very positive forward movement thanks to the competition (we have the same with gcc vs clang and in the end everyone wins). I also hope we will soon have a standard like we have for C/C++/FORTRAN. Multi-process does not work right with UXP because it really was not designed from the ground up to be like that. Modern Firefox is very different from the old one but the fact it is written in Rust seems more to be a detail to me. There is no fundamental gap that would prevent to port modern Rust to old Windows versions, it is just that the standard library for rust does not bother bother to support it. but some someone even made a port of rust to target Win9x/NT https://github.com/rust9x/rust.

they're just very similar, and this porting is just for fun.

@roytam1 What is the benefit of 55 over 52? Anyway, i hope it works out for you, and that it is not impossible, as the UXP/Pale Moon project was also forced to return to 52 when trying to to it with that one.

rebased my PM port to SP55, still lots of problems.