Leaderboard

Back in Action & Reupload it. https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BxP1VJf8kaXobWZmc3ZlNkZMVWM?usp=sharing ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hello, have modded the Nvidia Driver Packages 81.85, 82.69 and 93.71 . These Driver supports Geforce 6/7 and 8 series AGP/PCI-Express devices for Windows98SE/ME. Hope the drivers will work fine for all. For addional information read the Readme.txt. UPDATE: 12-05-2007 Repack NVIDIA Installer! Fixed frequency table! Added NVTweaks! Fully Support of AGP Graphic Devices Experimental Support of Geforce 8 series! Link: UP AGAIN! http://rapidshare.com/files/30969815/GF678_98ME.exe12-05-2007_23.32 Update: Added an Picture: Geforce 7600GT is found as GF73 Chip! BUT: Use at your own risk! NV Control Panel will not correctly dectected GF 7/8, but the it will be albe to detect the Chip revision ================================================================= NVIDIA Chip Detection ================================================================= ----------------------------------------------------------------- AGP-Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 LE NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XE NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS NV40 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT NV40 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 4000 NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 LE NV41 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT NV41 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 3450/4000 SDI NV41 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400 NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 VE NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6610 XL NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6700 XL NV43 = NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 NV43 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 550 NV43 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 NV43 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6500 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 TurboCache(tm) NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200SE TurboCache(tm) NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 LE NV44 = NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 A-LE ----------------------------------------------------------------- PCI-E Series; NV Control Panel will only detect the Chip Revision ----------------------------------------------------------------- G70 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX G70 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GTX G70 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT G70 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GTX G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GT/GTO G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7900 GS G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GX2 G71 = NVIDIA GeForce 7950 GT G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500 G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500 G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 G71 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500 X2 G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 LE G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 SE G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7500 LE G72 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 350 G72 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GS G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7650 GS G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 LE G73 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT G73 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 560 ----------------------------------------------------------------- AGP-Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 LE NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT NV48 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 XT ----------------------------------------------------------------- Onboard-Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- C51 = NVIDIA GeForce 6150 C51 = NVIDIA GeForce 6150 LE C51 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 C51 = NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S / NVIDIA GeForce 6150LE C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 430 C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 405 C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 400 C61 = NVIDIA GeForce 6100 nForce 420 ----------------------------------------------------------------- PCI-E Series; Will be detected by the NV Control Panel ----------------------------------------------------------------- BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 GT BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6200 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6600 LE BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GS BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GS/XT BR02 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 3400/4400 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 6800 Series GPU BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5750 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5900 BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce PCX 5300 BR02 = NVIDIA Quadro PCI-E Series BR02 = NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300 ----------------------------------------------------------------- PCI-E Series; NV Control Panel will only detect the Chip Revision ----------------------------------------------------------------- G80 = NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX G80 = NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS G80 = NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra G84 = NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GTS G84 = NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT G86 = NVIDIA GeForce 8500 GT G86 = NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS G86 = NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS ----------------------------------------------------------------- Can or Cant; Think 7xxx will be dectected as 6xxx - dont know ----------------------------------------------------------------- BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GT BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7600 GS BR02 = NVIDIA GeForce 7300 GT NV44 = NVIDIA GeForce 7100 GS Feedback me please your experience .. ZakMcKracken84

AFAIK, Firefox itself only ever used Windows Media Foundation (Vista+) for AVC, which is not available on XP, hence you need a plugin on that OS, but otherwise, Firefox 52.9 can do AVC without a plugin.

My screens don't need saving as none are CRT, though I have a screensaver that runs for 5 min before screen goes off. It's just for show. CPU/GPU usage depends on how it's coded and how intensive scene it shows. There are others out there than just the ones that come with Windows. Windows doesn't really detect fullscreen to prevent screensaver, it's up to applications to tell the OS it's not OK to fire up screensaver, turn off monitor, go to standby...

Regshot for ungoogled-chromium-88.0.4324.190-1_Win32 in Win7 --

Modified V13 Test: There were no connections to gstatic or some chinese server, but the very suspicious nonsense searches in NBNS and DNS keep happening, when the 360EE is started.

@Hunterw, you can try my suggestion for your screen going off . You need a player that is called "Aiseesoft Bluray Player portable" . Just do not install it ! It's chinese , you've been warned , though I didn't notice anything bad . Block it the firewall , of course ! Also , you need to look for a portable version , then just open it and leave it be . It will prevent the screen saver and your monitor from going off while watching videos in 360 browser or even playing . It was the only solution that worked for me . I do not even use the player itself , I just open when I want my screen to remain on. The suggestion by the member @ArcticFoxie doesn't work for me , maybe because I'm on Vista , not XP. BTW , you're very lucky he didn't go caps-locking on you , lol.

And? Did I not wait long enough for a reply? I wouldn't even have brought it up if you hadn't made your non-reply to it. I wasn't even talking to you. I was just asking the forum for help and YOU stirred this sh-it up. Not me. I just asked an innocent question. I didn't ask for your opinion on it. You're quoting something I wrote about your reply because I don't come here often? O...k... Finally. Thank you for the suggestion. I hope you will understand why this is unsatisfactory. Don't blame XP. Firefox doesn't do this. Chrome doesn't do this. They had a way of maintaining activity without peripheral inputs. I am frustrated by 360's inability here, because I watch a lot of video. A little confusing even since it's Chromium but apparently the part that handles the screen saver/monitor sleeping isn't included. I'm on 360 v12. I can just turn those things off for everything, which is an annoying pain in the a**, IMO not too much different from installing a special program and manually switching it on so that the half broken browser can get worked around.

Ha! really cool ... Delia Derbyshire - Frontier to Knowledge (UK 1972) Deus Ex Machina - Walkthrough, ZX Spectrum (UK 1984)

I use the normal spoiler tags - [ spoiler] before the text, and [ /spoiler] after (remove the space). But, for some reason i don't understand yet, the damn forum seems to ignore my closing tag and put everything after in the hidden block too... [edit] After posting you can edit your post and move the blocks around, but the contents aren't always editable. It seems that spoilers close properly when the opening and closing tags are on a single line. Move the closing tag to the next line and you get everything afterwards crammed inside too (test3 was supposed to be outside) Hopefully someone can explain how to properly do multi-line spoilers.

@we3fan Try setting media.webm.enabled to false in about:config page and see how it performs. Should only need a reload of the page to take effect if you had a video open before you've set it, YouTube's stats->Codecs will then say avc1. Edit: wait, if you insist on Firefox 52 and my memory is right, you need a plugin that will do the decoding of H.264 (AVC1) streams if you disable the above pref. Disabling it on its own will leave no codec to fallback on that FX will be able to decode.

Hmm... No problem here: Viewport / Frames 1280x720 / 0 dropped of 10713 Current / Optimal Res 1280x720@25 / 1280x720@25 Volume / Normalized 100% / 100% (content loudness -9.0dB) Codecs av01.0.05M.08 (398) / opus (251)

(Sorry, didn't have time to respond to this before.) I agree with your general point, but I'm not sure how much Google is to blame in this particular case. The thing is, programmers often tend to be pretty lazy when having to do maintenance tasks, because these aren't seen as "cool" and "innovative"... And this bug is a bit of a special case, because it takes almost 30 min to run a single test case, whether you're trying to track down where the regression originated, or trying to fix it. Let me give you a rough rundown of the process I went through with this (let's skip this long story for them normal people ; and this isn't about me looking for extra credit, honest! ) OK, so now consider that during virtually every step of this, you have to run a whole lot of 30 min (or longer) tests to make sure of your guesses or fixes. I am, of course, a great guy and all , but even with my highly vested hobbyist interest in solving this issue it took me several months to get through this all. Obviously not months of straight work on this alone, and obviously I didn't just sit around gaping at the screen every time I ran a test, but started the test and then did something else while it ran, but the whole thing still took time. Now, imagine I was an elite coder working at Mozilla , and generally supposed to work on some other stuff besides this. And, let's say you were my manager. Are you sure you'd let me spend all this time on this one, apparently (but really not) intermittent issue that seems to be affecting only a few people (really affecting all, but 99.99% of those people wouldn't put 2 and 2 together and notice the very specific interval and would instead write these freezes off as internet issues or whatever else) on a "legacy" OS that doesn't have that long to live anyway (or so you think, not knowing about POSReady, and MSFN )? And would I, an elite Mozilla engineer , want you to make me spend my precious time on something like this? I mean, even without the whole Windows driver dive and leak hunting thing they obviously wouldn't get into (the leak hadn't happened yet, either), it's a lot of work that isn't "cool", nor "innovative"! This is not to say that I excuse the fact that they don't even run tests for longer playback, etc., etc. We all know Mozilla has lots of problems with their attitude and policies, and there are many things they aren't doing that they should be doing (and vice versa). I definitely do blame them for letting this fall through the cracks and not doing more to fix this. But as far as Google goes, since they probably weren't using cubeb, maybe they themselves never ran into this bug (at least its more obvious, 2x:xx version), and since this isn't an issue specific to Youtube, I think I wouldn't blame them too much for this one. But there is Microsoft, who introduced this bug in the first place with that pretty dumb coding error...

I also encountered a warning by Vista's firewall asking me if I want to block an incoming connection to 360chrome executable file , with v12. I want to note that I have another firewall installed (which is considered to be good) , but it didn't notice anything strange (!) , though it has almost paranoid level of settings. Vista's firewall is good ? I think so, yes. I knew about 360's incoming connections for a long time. I warned about this a long time ago , which could be found at my profile . I just thought they had disabled them already , but it seems no, they are still here.

New build of BOC/UXP for XP! Test binary: MailNews Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/mailnews.win32-20210724-355db4de-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z BNavigator Win32 https://o.rthost.win/boc-uxp/bnavigator.win32-20210724-355db4de-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/boc-uxp/tree/custom-older * Notice: the profile prefix (i.e. parent folder names) are also changed since 2020-08-15 build, you may rename their names before using new binaries when updating from builds before 2020-08-15. -- New build of HBL-UXP for XP! Test binary: IceDove-UXP(mail) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/icedove.win32-20210724-id-f0915f3-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z IceApe-UXP(suite) https://o.rthost.win/hbl-uxp/iceape.win32-20210724-id-f0915f3-ia-c642e3c-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z source repo (excluding UXP): https://github.com/roytam1/icedove-uxp/tree/winbuild https://github.com/roytam1/iceape-uxp/tree/winbuild for UXP changes please see above.

New build of Serpent/UXP for XP! Test binary: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20210724-f94c0da-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win64-git-20210724-f94c0da-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/custom IA32 Win32 https://o.rthost.win/basilisk/basilisk52-g4.8.win32-git-20210724-f94c0da-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod-ia32.7z source code that is comparable to my current working tree is available here: https://github.com/roytam1/UXP/commits/ia32 NM28XP build: Win32 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.4a1.win32-git-20210724-40852a372-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z Win32 SSE https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.4a1.win32-git-20210724-40852a372-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod-sse.7z Win64 https://o.rthost.win/palemoon/palemoon-28.10.4a1.win64-git-20210724-40852a372-uxp-74989fb28-xpmod.7z Official UXP changes since my last build: - WIP: Base implementation (f864b515d) - Issue #1725 - Fix logic in PerformPromiseAllSettled. (5764d0c28) - Merge branch 'master' into Promise-allSettled (22377b86a) - Merge pull request 'Implement Promise.allSettled()' (#1796) from athenian200/UXP:Promise-allSettled into master (74989fb28) Official Basilisk changes since my last build: - Back-end branch pointer update (f94c0da) Official Pale-Moon changes since my last build: - Back-end branch pointer update (1d67dc09e) - New cycle. (40852a372)

Like you ordered , with proof . I decided to bash them with something more sophisticated. It is not easy , to fake an iPhone agent , you will need to write a programme for this. I've succesfuly blocked the vendor string detection by UA ! UA wasn't able to collect any hints about my real vendor . Now you can try to use any iPhone useragent for yourself or use the one below . Choose an iPhone useragent with your extension and try https://html5test.com/ . It will still detect that your cheating. Oh , and I'm just really curious , you see , I do upvote your posts , will you upvote mine , cause it really shines and it's a huge breakthrough in terms of privacy . No ? How so ? Something personal ? Agents for this testing taken from here . https://whatmyuseragent.com/browser/mf/mobile-safari/14 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_4 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_6 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.5 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5_1 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.1 Mobile/15E148 Safari/604.1 Mozilla/5.0 (iPhone; CPU iPhone OS 14_5 like Mac OS X) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/14.0 Mobile/15E148 Safari/605.1.15

1 - I don't know anything about v13. on "later OS" . The latest for me is Vista x64 and it doesn't have any problems , like I said . Perhaps it's because you're using another version ? Try 1106 "beta", it's good . 2- And what environment would that be ? (specs , OS) What do you mean by "newer OS" , is it Vista and up ? I'm sorry I thought you're on XP , right ? 3- Did you or did you not try to install that cert. pack . I remember I started to get cert. errors somewhere around May 2021 . I installed his pack (without SHA-2 updates) and all problems just vanished . I can't replicate your issues with any on these versions on Vista x64 , sorry. About youtbue , try to change your UA , perhaps your slownees is due to numerous scripts and bloat coming from youtube ? Do you have a good adblocker ? Try using mobile user agent from iphone , maybe ? Youtube will load less scripts/bloat if you're on iphone. Other things to consider , try using 344.xx or 347.xx drivers if you're on GTX.

@XPerceniol , yes , I already told you . I'll give it to you , in fact it's been prepared already . Just shoot me a message .< I'll reply. @ArcticFoxie , give me a chance to reply ! You're bombarding me with questions, I'm sorry , I have a job and/or personal needs , like sleeping. I understand you have lots of energy and plenty of free time , lol. I'll answer later. Thanks for the attention.

Perhaps worth a look, free editor with syntax highlighting etc.: 920 Text Editor https://android.izzysoft.de/repo/apk/com.jecelyin.editor.v2 https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.jecelyin.editor.v2 I see it's now 5MB, but when I installed mine four years ago it was just 1MB. That version runs quite well on my old 0.5gb phone.

Use Easy BCD and forget about to change anything manually.

mmh .. the *.inf file ist named NVAML.INF and must be in the extracted folder of the archive. The rar archive contains the .inf-file .. have checked this!