All Activity

The update "WINDOWS2000-OTSKB000001-V3-X86-INTL.exe" has been released to the general public today. --- The updater was written from scratch and therefore does not cause copyright problems: updater-V3.png --- The help file "OTSKB.chm" was updated and is available as a separate file. But it is also included in the update (click on the "open the help file" button). --- The code comparison file "code.htm" was updated to include the version 3 changes. It's probably the final version. Well, at least if nothing unexpected comes up.

Are you sure? For me it no longer works everywhere, they are mostly dead because of stupidity to openly discuss their cause and more stupid was the automatic switch to other invidious when one failed.

Either the polyfil doesn't work, or the extension doesn't. Is @NotHereToPlayGames stille here?

Not working here either. If I try with Supermium, it does work, With that, there is code in the box next to the run and reset buttons when the page first loads, which is not there in 360Chrome. I thought uBlock might have been causing the problem, but disabling it made no difference. Don't know why this is I'm afraid.

Open the link: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/findLastIndex and then click "Run." The field should then display "3" as the output.

https://web.archive.org/web/20150103162921/http://xchat.org/files/source/ look as there is some sources... why not try rewrite it with ipv6 support?

The script loads OK for me, but how can I test it? What is it actually supposed to do?

Same hardware as original "MS Notepad" or Open Source "Notepad++" or other simple "Text Editors".

Does my script work for you for findLastIndex?

I can't see anything obviously wrong with that, but I'm no expert on scripting, I'm afraid. @NotHereToPlayGames is the man to ask.

And hardware?

I found the following page to test: https://developer.mozilla.org/de/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/findLastIndex I have the following code for this, but it doesn't work: // ==UserScript== // @name Inject findLastIndex // @version 0.0.1 // @description try to take over the world! // @match *://*/* // @run-at document-start // @grant none // ==/UserScript== if (!Array.prototype.findLastIndex) { 'use strict'; Object.defineProperty(Array.prototype, "findLastIndex", { value: function (predicate, thisArg) { let idx = this.length - 1; while (idx >= 0) { const value = this[idx]; if (predicate.call(thisArg, value, idx, this)) { return idx; } idx--; } return -1; } , writable: true, enumerable: false, configurable: true }); } What am I doing wrong?

Sounds difficult. But I can take a look if you are doing something 'wrong'. Please upload followowing files (if available): HDALOG.TXT, HDACFG.INI and SYSTEM.INI (from your Windows directory), CONFIG.SYS and AUTOEXEC.BAT (from your C-drive).

@Tihiy one more thing - I've noticed that toggling Action center icon visibility doesn't actually change the SysTrayActionCenter value in registry, because of that I can't disable that icon when deploying SAB and its config through script for example. It doesn't change the icon visibility either when I change the value directly in registry.

I use OrangeMonkey to run my scripts, and that appears to work fine, but so should Tampermonkey of course! I'm not sure how to check whether they are actually working!

I once read a description somewhere about how to integrate polyfills with Tampermonkey, and there was also a link to a page that listed various polyfills. Unfortunately, I can't find it anymore. I've installed Tampermonkey, but the polyfills I entered don't work. Does anyone have a description of how to do this correctly and a link to the polyfills? I'd like to continue using the "old" version of 360Chrome because it requires very little memory. Unfortunately, more and more websites are experiencing problems, which I hope to solve with polyfills.

Hello, I have a Lenovo m93p tiny with an intel 3770, triple booted Win98/WinXP/Win7. I built a mini server rack with a few lenovo tinys that do different tasks for my business. This one is for really just for trying old software and playing around. A bit of nostalgia. I know its probably way too modern really although Win98 does run fine on it along with the other two OS's. I overcome the GPU issue (no drivers for 3rd gen iGPU) by running a pci-e geforce 6 series from the mini pci-e slot. That works fine. USB is an issue with it right now as it freezes the system if I let it try and install the USB controller (so i've skipping installing drivers for that) but legacy USB works fine just for mouse and keyboard. I'm surprised this much works. I was quite happy with that to be honest but then I read of Watler's HDA/Win3.1 driver and being able to have possibly working sound with Realtek HDA. That would be great. I downloaded HDADRV9J, followed the steps here: ...thinking that sound would either just work or not work. Instead, my system freezes at the desktop wallpaper in Win98 before explorer/desktop icons appear. I also see a strange graphical corruption (like a thin striped bar) at the top of screen when it freezes. I tried the 9L driver (just moved the HDA2.dll from that into c:\windows\system instead) but got the same issue. From what I could find out, this tiny pc uses either ALC662 and ALC283 sound chip. It would be great to find out if this driver has any potential to work for me. Hopefully i'm just doing something wrong. Thanks, James.

Nice work I've got a hand full of WinSock 1.1 compatible apps. All of the old Xchat clients, before it went demo/paid/shareware, should work. But that would only test the IPv4 connectivity. Whats an IPv6 application, for Win9x? Xchat 1.8.8, Last one. Also have a Win95B VM (no WinSock Update), I could probably test it on. Yeah, it would be real hard to use only WinSock 1.1 applications. By 2001 almost everything was WinSock 2. But, it is interesting to see how he implemented it. Hx Dos extender has a WinSock implementation (Incomplete, I think?). It rides off of a packet driver and provides networking for Windows applications, in "real" dos. I suppose ReactOS has a WinSock, too. Both offer a peek into making a WinSock. But that is a time eating project (a little bit, anyway). It seems like it might be an inevitable need, I just don't know how soon. Although, I'm sure we'll figure it out, if the time ever arrives

Did you try 355.98 Nvidia driver? It's considered the least problematic driver for Maxwell GPU's under WinXP. I use it.

@Tihiy I don't know if that's a bug or something you've changed (as I didn't noticed that in release notes), but changing tray icons to show Windows 11 flyouts now allows to show those flyouts without merging all the system tray icon like in current Windows 11 taskbar, but it's a fantastic change and I thank you very much for that! AFAIR it wasn't working like that before in older versions, it was still merging all system tray icons into one icon like on Win11 right?

CAupdater alone should be enough.

I had this problem with a Gigabyte AM3 motherboard I bought back in 2014. In 2023 it started having those symptoms. It would go into the future. I would fix it and then the next day it was in the future again. Later I would physically see the clock moving faster and XP would behave weirdly like if it was in fast forward. Like even the Loading bootscreen would move very fast. Anyways it lasted for a few months like that until eventually it died and wouldn't boot anymore. I'm just giving the example because it could be a hardware issue. Linux didn't show the problem because it would sync online immediately at boot.

xp posready; 1. CERT_updater_V1.6 2. CAupdater 3.https://github.com/JohnTHaller/RootCertificateUpdatesForLegacyWindows - is it enough to update the certificates?

Windows7 sp1, 8, 8.1, 10, 11

possible i already solved this "problem"... patch for Vtwinsck.vxd SIZE 179861 DATE 5.May.2004 CRC32 5c32ece0: 2741C: A9 01 00 00 00 -> 33 C0 83 C0 01 but i am not sure, that it was so simple... i cant check, is it work properly, or not. and anyway, it crack all winsock subsystem... my "9x" is 98IF, and too "updated" for this thing. so this is useless.