All Activity

Doesn't seem to. Just retested three times with just one tab: 136, 125, 131. Then again, not really a night-and-day difference between the two, can't notice it outside benchmarks.

360Chrome starts fastest for me.

hi i have a windows 98 hp dv6725es laptop and i cant seem to find any drivers, could someone help me?

Thorium actually starts relatively fast compared to other Chrome browsers under Windows XP, even on low-performance hardware like mine. Of course, it has first to be configured well.

You have other sites opened in Supermium, this obviously adds performance penalty. Msfn, github and reddit. Esp. githun and reddit are heavy.

@Dave-H, would you be willing to try out --disable-low-res-tiling? --disable-low-res-tiling reduces cpu usage and saves power https://codereview.chromium.org/196473007/ https://stackoverflow.com/questions/66825943/how-to-reduce-chromedriver-cpu-usage-in-selenium-python

I think that was it, thanks.

Probably you hit the size limit. Try to delete your old attachments. It helped me, I can embed since then.

Is for me too (in XP), both about the same in Vista & 7. BTW, sorry for linking images, can't embed them (images of any size) for some reason.

With our without HPET, yes, a bit faster start, like Dave wrote. But I'm not on a single core. Those on a single core would've seen a faster startup.

It's very strange, it's not related to CSS, nowhere near it. And the author of Thorium suggests that flag himself. Unfortunately (or fortunately?), I can't link to his site because he hosts Windows cr*cks, pirated loaders on it. But I can make a quote, those interested may find themselves. "--disable-highres-timer[1] ## Disables high-resolution timer on Windows."

Could you please add an option to change position of date/time vice versa.

@Dietmar These VIA chipset PCI cards have drivers going back to win3.1. https://www.ebay.com/itm/195952338235

Using --disable-highres-timer did more harm than good on my system. Yes, the browser loaded a bit more quickly, but Instagrm looked a total mess, like the CSS files weren't loaded, and several other sites also produced a mess before rendering properly. I removed the switch pretty quickly! Things don't take very long to load on my system anyway, I think Thorium is noticeably faster than Supermium in that respect.

The most effect of it when you have a motherborad with HPET off.

Your results? I've tested this flag and NONE of the SEVERAL quantifiable measurements (ie, the only real way to truly eliminate Placebo Effect) shows any "considerable" performance difference. Sorry, you have to be a bit patient. I am testing so much and can't say anything qualified about one single flag. Too much flags here and too much other performance settings to identify the effects of a single flag.

Just to revisit DreamMial Pro. Is it still available? And is it free? There seem to be a lot of shadier looking download sites for it, but I'm weary of those. The previous link for the latest version seems to error out on me.

Control Center is screwed up and total degradation on 24H2, blame Microsoft.

It's expected for now. Not that Insider is generally supported

Nah, it doesn't seem that vfw1.1d contain any other DCI drivers. Only driver with DCI in the name is DCISVGA.DRV.

Uhm... This should contain V4W SDK: https://archive.org/details/msdn-1996-04 But it's likely that it won't contain DCI stuff (anyway, I would still check) as it's from 1996. Maybe an earlier version of MSDN cds from 1994? I found this one, but it has a bunch of (7z compressed) iso files: https://archive.org/details/MSDNOctober1994 I would check WIN16 and WIN32SDK discs. I guess ADD_16BIT and ADD_32BIT are likely to contain addons for 16-bit and 32-bit SDKs. Might be worth checking too. The rest CDS are likely related to Windows NT 3.5 (or its beta). There are docs for VFW 1.1e DK here, but no downloads: http://discmaster.textfiles.com/view/11931/2002-07-02_ftp.microsoft.com.zip/developr/drg/Multimedia/Jumpstart/VfW11e/DK/DEV_KIT.TXT As Jumper said this might not contain DCI stuff. Although, looking into it, they only removed dcivesa (or similar - which is a generic DCI driver) from redistributable. Might be possible there are other DCI drivers in it. Or not. Should be checked. Same for DK.

I have been using the 125 version for several weeks on Win 7, I also have the CustomCSSforFx though I have not had time to try any of the code. I have ten laptops here that were given to me by the US Consulate here in Costa Rico since the US upgraded all their equipment. All 2020 Dells reformatted and have some Linux distro installed. Anyway I would think r3dfox would use the Win 10 apis when running Win 10.

Your results? I've tested this flag and NONE of the SEVERAL quantifiable measurements (ie, the only real way to truly eliminate Placebo Effect) shows any "considerable" performance difference.

Ok. Didn't notice that. Then it wasn't a request for normal DNS after all

Hello, i don't know if its a bug or not but toggling the Quick settings to on its just unifies the network and volume icons, before was adding a new icon near the clock. This is on build 26120.461. And i have a feature request, can you add back Quick action battery and quick action edit buttons witch are not present anymore in build 26120.461. Also can you make Quick panel disappear if you click anywhere else beside the network and/or clock icons, like calendar is disappearing. Thank you.