All Activity

Thanks, that's good to know, although personally I'm not worried about my browsers being 'Googled'.

Waste

Browser

Honestly, something strange is going on, do you drag the same nlited ISO across all of your hardware? None of us here have the same problem with either this or the first launch.

Opera

Soap

I feel like I'm getting closer, I copied all the settings from your last piece of code to my reg files, still haven't found the single culprit yet, though.... I even set up two partitions, one applied with WinNTSetup (and all the tweaks and settings), didn't actually rebooted to start the setup, but got a list of all the files, and the SOFTWARE and SYSTEM hives. Second partition has the same install.wim, this time applied with my own scripts. Reg Load'ed the hives and exported them to .reg, then textdiff'd them to find missing stuff in mine. Still no luck (have to check once more if I really got everything), but I'll keep trying... Not sure when that will be... Some people actually call this fun :-) Once again it is proven that WinNTSetup rules!!! [Of course, in the mean time I've been doing 26100 tests using WinNTSetup itself, working just fine and providing great command line options for all its powerful capabilities. Thanks once more, JFX!!!!!!]

Hi. If you need to block Google services you can make up for it with various filter lists found in Filterlists. Check which one is best for your needs. In the image I have included a filter in software (choose your adblock) then you can search for “Google”:

Why didn't you say right away that you mean the Adguard filter lists inside uBlock Origin if I understood you correctly this time? Clear questions would be more effective in obtaining suitable answers. Anyway! I will test these filter lists and report. However, in single-process mode, uBlock Origin works great as far as I can say. @feodor2 I performed several tests with uBlock Origin 1.57.2 in the multi-process mode of Mypal 68.14.0b. So far, all filters including the Adguard ones seem to be working as they should. Blocking ads, scripts and other objects on the websites and ad blocker test sites I have selected works, too. But as I already stated here, uBlock Origin 1.57.2 only works in this mode on my computer with a 32-bit single-core CPU if extensions.webextensions.remote is set to false. However, this setting means a kind of neutering the multi-process mode and in my opinion can only be a temporary fix, as it affects all installed extensions in any case. Although I am glad that uBlock Origin 1.57.2 is working in multi-process mode at the moment, I therefore still think that a real fixing of this issue would be a better solution than partially switching off multi-process mode.

Lavender

France

FWIW, I have no idea how much Thorium and Supermium can be considered to be 'clones'. As far as I'm concerned if they were clones they would be identical, and that they are not! Although they look so similar they must have both started from the same base, they have different developers working on them, so they have diverged. I'm still very grateful (and still astounded!) that they both work on Windows XP, albeit with some issues, using such a recent Chromium version. A few years ago, I'm sure we all thought that would be absolutely impossible! I'm sticking with Thorium now, although still keeping an eye on where Supermium is going too of course. Thorium has a couple of facilities now that I was really missing after using 360Chrome, natively keeping the browser open when the last tab is closed, without having to use an extension to do it, and double-clicking to close tabs, which I use all the time, and I first got used to back in the days of Presto Opera! The only important (to me) thing still missing is a setting to always open bookmarks in a new tab, which you could also do on 360Chrome. I hate it when you click on a link and it overwrites the current tab. I know you can do it with middle click and the right click menu, but I got used to opening bookmarks automatically in new tabs without having to think about it! There doesn't seem to be an extension which will easily and simply fix that, not that I've found, anyway. I'm very pleased that both the Thorium and Supermium developers seem to now be committed to producing un-Googled versions. For those that want that, I hope they don't have to wait for too long.

JNZ checks ZF flag, so you still have to change it for sure.

Confirmed! Tz Clock can no longer get the correct time zones in Mypal 68.14.0b.. I don't know to what extent the implementation of the lacking feature "Internationalization & Localization" that I reported to the issues of Mypal 68 here long time ago would change anything, If you want, you can report this to the Mypal 68's issues on GitHub. @feodor2 recently created a separate issue for extensions which stopped working due to his recent browser changes.

The update of the javascript engine of course, what else ! Regards

Freedom

Pleasure

That seems to have worked. I tried the script (in OrangeMonkey, which I already have installed for other scripts) but it didn't seem to do anything. Thanks @nicolaasjan for your suggestion too. Let's hope that's finally it!

Pain

Accident

Are we really, though? There's so much computers on the market that I wouldn't have the slightest idea what to buy if I was in the market for a new one. Admittedly, my interest in computers waned with loss of interest in gaming, and having to do things I dislike on computer at work doesn't help.

The (similar) fix in basilisk 52 doesn't affect Tx Clock.

May be this is a more elegant way, because it sets the last bit in ah always to 1, no matter what has been there before and does not change any other bit in ah and gives the same result as the test, if the last bit in ah is 1 Dietmar .text:0031F3CB call sub_315CDC .text:0031F3D0 or ah, 1 .text:0031F3D3 jnz short loc_31F3E0 .text:0031F3D5 ; --------------------------------------------------------------------------- .text:0031F3D5 push 238Ch .text:0031F3DA call sub_323C94 .text:0031F3DF pop ecx

Wine

Despite what the "Collaborator" wrote: "Many flags have been added from Ungoogled Chromium, with more planned in the future." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/discussions/402#discussioncomment-8848901 People write there are "connections to google's servers" https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/discussions/402#discussion-6398329 Do you see the same in Thorium?