All Activity
- Past hour
-
That's already been solved, along with other fingerprinting defences like Client Rects, I sent you a message. Writing here, too, in case you read without logging in. Regards.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
nicolaasjan replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Go to Tools ---> Preferences ---> Tabs Uncheck "Close the window when the last tab is closed". @AstroSkipper said: Yes, that also works. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
AstroSkipper replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
If the pref browser.tabs.closeWindowWithLastTab is set to true, this will happen. So you have to set it to false. I never tried that myself but it should actually work. -
Indeed it doesn't! It's now stuffed with so much bloat, they even managed to crapify it with "VK" app. From what I understand, it's some sort of a Russian dating website! The App is un-deletable, and Opera connects to Russian developers' website with very questionable content, not to mention that Russian social website.
- 145 replies
-
- software
- Windows 8.1
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Hey, where are you? Don't disappear! We miss you.
-
Those two look also like the whole purpose of the accounts creation is far from technical aspects. https://msfn.org/board/profile/441008-c-care-preschool/ https://msfn.org/board/profile/440995-mike-lund-painting/
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
D.Draker replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
It's more of a trend, not a bug, It happens in new Chrome, also. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
kiza124 replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
Why is it done in palemoon 28 that if 1 tab is open and you click the cross (make Close Tab), then the entire browser closes? Is this how it was intended or is this happening by mistake? - Today
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
kuja killer replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
well..here it is on my end. on serpent. -
Disable Driver Signature Enforcement in 24H2 build
D.Draker replied to ibay770's topic in Windows 11
Signing tools also don't work? -
1ghz dual core with 2 or 4Gb of ram for Windows 11 IoT LTSC??!? Is this a joke?
-
Also looks like a purely American Invention, I just found a 2014 article with a budget Fujitsu Lifebook E544, it had a DVD drive, despite being very thin for 2014, and two DVDs included: "driver DVD and recovery DVDs for both Windows 7 and 8.1 were included." https://www.notebookcheck.net/Fujitsu-Lifebook-E544-Notebook-Review.132628.0.html
-
Configuring Mini-PC's With Zero Auto Updates On Windows 7
NotHereToPlayGames replied to Bondppq's topic in Windows 7
The "American Invention" (retail computers NOT being provided with PHYSICAL MEDIA) is very likely the result that right around Win7, laptops didn't come with internal cd/dvd-rom drives. Why provide an installation DISC if the computer doesn't even have a way to read it, lol. Talking strictly corporate-distribution laptops. Thinner, lighter, no cd-rom drives. Heck, some of our company laptops of that time frame don't even have internal speakers! -
And yes, @Tripredacus is absolutely right! Windows 7 was also distributed as RTM with SP1 (at least with Fujitsu, see the image below).
-
That's an American "invention", all of my Siemens (later branded as just Fujitsu, made in Germany) computers (desktops and laptops) came with physical media. LOVE THAT! The tradition went on even with Win 7, not sure about 8 and later.
-
Configuring Mini-PC's With Zero Auto Updates On Windows 7
Karla Sleutel replied to Bondppq's topic in Windows 7
In Denmark we call that boxed Windows disk: "retail version", in Canada, were I'm currently in, they have all sorts of interpretations, including the RTM variant, like in the posted video. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
UCyborg replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I haven't visited Reddit in a while, but what I like about the new one is seeing beginning of the text of each post without having to open it. But opening it while using a new layout in current tab is very clunky as when you go back, you don't land where you were due to lack of pagination, so opening in a new tab works better, though using single tab with old layout is more responsive and intuitive. It seems memory usage jumps as soon as more posts load beyond the ones visible initially. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
UCyborg replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
No issue on Pale Moon (the original, of course) either. -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Skorpios replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
kuja killer replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
oh god i just noticed that too. another website in my bookmarks list that i look at once in awhile is https://www.wrestlingforum.com/forums/ ..it must probably be the exact same type of forum as the one you mentioned.. it also does that stupidly huge icon thing that's in front of posts. And yea, it makes reading things almost impossible. I've never seen such a thing ever happen before today. :| -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Mathwiz replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
I frequent AVSForum.com, and they made a change today that's resulting in insanity on St 55. See attachment. (There's also a link you can use for testing at the bottom of the image.) That used to be a tiny icon in each post. Now it's giant sized and overlays the post text, making it unreadable. (I already tried a clean profile. No difference.) I've seen this on a few other sites and assume it's some newly-popular CSS Googlism. Anyone know of a workaround, other than "switch to the latest Chrome version?" -
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
Mathwiz replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
The only reason I knew about it is that it came up a few months ago when St started doing it in single-process as well as multiprocess mode, and someone came up with that setting as a workaround and posted it in this thread. I guess St was fixed later on, but the fix only works in single-process mode? Edit: It was actually in the previous "generation" of this thread: https://msfn.org/board/topic/184051-my-browser-builds-part-4/?do=findComment&comment=1228833 -
@sonyu Grub.efi, AmiSetupWriter.efi, SceEfi64.efi, RU.efi, dmpstore - these are different tools that are used for the same - to change CMOS and EFI VARIABLES e.g. BIOS Lock in my AMI UEFI BIOS: using IFR Extractor (best from UBU) make file setup_extr.txt from bios file search BIOS Lock variable - offset is 0xB52 VarStore is 0x1 and this ID is Setup EFI VARIABLE: 0x4F0D0 One Of: BIOS Lock, VarStoreInfo (VarOffset/VarName): 0xB52, VarStore: 0x1, QuestionId: 0xC42, Size: 1, Min: 0x0, Max 0x1, Step: 0x0 {05 91 9A 0A 9B 0A 42 0C 01 00 52 0B 10 10 00 01 00} search VarStoreId 0x1 - Name: Setup: 0x2BDF5 VarStore: VarStoreId: 0x1 [EC87D643-EBA4-4BB5-A1E5-3F3E36B20DA9], Size: 0x1331, Name: Setup {24 1C 43 D6 87 EC A4 EB B5 4B A1 E5 3F 3E 36 B2 0D A9 01 00 31 13 53 65 74 75 70 00} Now if we know where the BIOS Lock setting is to change them by using various tools - AmiSetupWriter.efi is very simple - we only need to know offset: AmiSetupWriter 0xB52 0x0 In RU.efi we need to know EFI VARIABLE and Offset: But these tools will not help if EFI VARIABLES are write protected.
-
My Browser Builds (Part 5)
kuja killer replied to roytam1's topic in Browsers working on Older NT-Family OSes
woa, that actually worked. yea it's acting normal now when i tested again after doing that. Well.. i would never had a clue about that. :| Thank you.