Tomcat76 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 (edited) Doesn't really matter. Temporarily renaming the file works around the issue.I fixed the problem with the "Advanced INF" popup. There's an error in the "custom destination" section of roxio.inf: MS forgot to add ",5" to the end of one of the lines in there. HFSLIP (61004exp) is now stripping out that section and rewriting it the proper way.This is just like codecs10.inf from WMP10 and wmfdist95.exe from both the KB891122 and KB900325 hotfixes... That file is trying to copy "codecs.10" into the INF directory and this hasn't been fixed in like two years...The problem with the shortcuts was my doing. I now removed the silent Adobe Reader, .NET 1.1 and JRE 5u8 installers from RyanVM and stripped this out of my custom .REG file:[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\MediaPlayer\Player\Settings];"Client ID"="";"OpenNew"="yes"[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\MediaPlayer\Preferences];"SendUserGUID"=hex:00So one of those was responsible. My guess is that it's the registry entries, heheh. So be aware that modifying the registry with those entries (at least beforehand) will break the shortcuts to WMP9.The problem with the playlists is still a mystery... Edited October 4, 2006 by Tomcat76 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NtegrA Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 (edited) XPSP2Tried using hfslip-1.0b-61003a and am getting in the dos copy phase "can't find playlist.inf" (total wmp10 integration?). Then during graphical phase I get popup of missing "C:\WINDOWS\HFSLIP\playlist.inf" (Advanced INF Install) at T-13. Thought it was merge / no merge options, but just tried again with option A (previous try option D). same results.As I was posting this looked over and saw that you released another version. Will try that unless there is any files that I should up for you to look at. Edited October 4, 2006 by NtegrA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super-Magician Posted October 4, 2006 Share Posted October 4, 2006 NtegrA: The new version won't necessarily fix your problem. Only changes to WMP9 slipstreaming were made. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted October 4, 2006 Author Share Posted October 4, 2006 Is PLAYLIST.IN_ present in the I386 folder of the new source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share Posted October 5, 2006 If it's in the new source then 61004b should fix it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super-Magician Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Hmmm...I find it amusing that 61001a was 141 KB and 61004b is back to 147 KB ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NtegrA Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 (edited) Sorry for the delay, I was done for the day. (should actually be a YAWNING smilie)Is PLAYLIST.IN_ present in the I386 folder of the new source?yes. it is there.If it's in the new source then 61004b should fix it.Giving it a go right now. will let you know in a few hours how it went.11am:YOU ARE DA MAN! (as always). Build completed 100% no errors. Edited October 5, 2006 by NtegrA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share Posted October 5, 2006 Hmmm...I find it amusing that 61001a was 141 KB and 61004b is back to 147 KB !WMP9, ya know... Build completed 100% no errors.Nice Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_guy Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 I know HFSLIP recently added support for MSXML2, but I have 2 questions:1)If I were to slipstream MSXML 3 SP7 on 2000/XP (2003 SP1 includes it), would I have duplicate entries in txtsetup.sif/doesnet.inf?2)Is KB832414 supported for MSXML 2.5 on 2000 SP4 (included in XP SP2 (not sure about SP1) and 2003 SP1)?Other that that, Looks great Tomcat.the_guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super-Magician Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 Seems we're pretty much ready for a new final - especially since we haven't released one since August!But, I guess we should wait until AFTER October 10 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share Posted October 5, 2006 1)If I were to slipstream MSXML 3 SP7 on 2000/XP (2003 SP1 includes it), would I have duplicate entries in txtsetup.sif/doesnet.inf?Don't see why. The file names are different: msxml2.dll and msxml2r.dll vs. msxml3.dll and msxml3r.dll...2)Is KB832414 supported for MSXML 2.5 on 2000 SP4 (included in XP SP2 (not sure about SP1) and 2003 SP1)?It is now... Seems we're pretty much ready for a new finalI prefer to have some more test results come in...But, I guess we should wait until AFTER October 10 .This is a good way to test how well the renewed HFSLIP script does... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_guy Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 @Tomcat: I just read my question, and it doesn't apply to 2000 as 891861 is what introduces MSXML 3. What I meant was, XP SP2 includes MSXML 3 SP5, and if I were to slipstream MSXML 3 SP7, would there be duplicate entries? They both include msxml3(a/r).dll.the_guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomcat76 Posted October 5, 2006 Author Share Posted October 5, 2006 Your posts are getting confusing. I'll clarify....Win2K has:- MSXML 2.5 version 8.0.6730.0Win 2K can be upgraded to all of these:- MSXML 2.5 version 8.0.7002.0- MSXML 2 SP6 version 8.30.9531.0- MSXML 3 SP7 version 8.70.1104.0- MSXML 4 SP2 version 4.20.9828.0- MSXML 6 version 6.0.3883.0WinXP SP1 has:- MSXML 2.5 version 8.0.6730.0- MSXML 2 SP? version 8.30.8709.0- MSXML 3 SP3 version 8.30.9926.0WinXP SP1 can be upgraded to all of these:- MSXML 2.5 version 8.0.7002.0- MSXML 2 SP6 version 8.30.9531.0- MSXML 3 SP7 version 8.70.1104.0- MSXML 4 SP2 version 4.20.9828.0- MSXML 6 version 6.0.3883.0WinXP SP2 has:- MSXML 2.5 version 8.0.7002.0- MSXML 2 SP? version 8.30.9529.0- MSXML 3 SP5 version 8.50.2162.0WinXP SP2 can be upgraded to all of these:- MSXML 2 SP6 version 8.30.9531.0- MSXML 3 SP7 version 8.70.1104.0- MSXML 4 SP2 version 4.20.9828.0- MSXML 6 version 6.0.3883.0Win2K3 SP1 has:- MSXML 2.5 version 8.0.7002.0- MSXML 2 SP? version 8.30.9528.0- MSXML 3 SP7 version 8.70.1104.0Win2K3 SP1 can be upgraded to all of these:- MSXML 2 SP6 version 8.30.9531.0- MSXML 4 SP2 version 4.20.9828.0- MSXML 6 version 6.0.3883.0 What I meant was, XP SP2 includes MSXML 3 SP5, and if I were to slipstream MSXML 3 SP7, would there be duplicate entries? They both include msxml3(a/r).dll.No; HFSLIP only adds entries in TXTSETUP.SIF and DOSNET.INF for new binaries, not updated binaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_guy Posted October 5, 2006 Share Posted October 5, 2006 What I mean is:I have XP SP2 in my source folder. It has MSXML 3 SP5. I put MSXML 3 SP7 in to be slipstremed (msxml3.msi in HF). Will I have d1,msxml3.dll showing up twice in my dosnet.inf? That's what I meant. That list you posted is quite good, thanks Tomcat.the_guy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super-Magician Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 What I mean is:I have XP SP2 in my source folder. It has MSXML 3 SP5. I put MSXML 3 SP7 in to be slipstremed (msxml3.msi in HF). Will I have d1,msxml3.dll showing up twice in my dosnet.inf? That's what I meant. That list you posted is quite good, thanks Tomcat.Doesn't this right here answer your question quite clearly??No; HFSLIP only adds entries in TXTSETUP.SIF and DOSNET.INF for new binaries, not updated binaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now