Sampei.Nihira Posted June 9 Share Posted June 9 (edited) **** Edited September 4 by Sampei.Nihira Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted June 12 Author Share Posted June 12 Finally looked at this, focus is set to false by default. VPN was still enabled. I'm in the middle of working on an experimental feature, so I can't exactly just go and flip the pref, but I'll try to remember to do so. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jody Thornton Posted July 9 Share Posted July 9 Will there be an ESR 128 build equivalent @K4sum1? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted July 10 Author Share Posted July 10 18 hours ago, Jody Thornton said: Will there be an ESR 128 build equivalent @K4sum1? I should probably mention some of the newer releases here. I made a 115 ESR for Vista build, and I will do the same for 128 soon. I'm going to be building my own Rust fork to fix a couple issues I've encountered with the 115 ESR build, and once I do that, I'll work on making a 128 ESR for Vista build. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted July 10 Share Posted July 10 (edited) **** Edited September 4 by Sampei.Nihira 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
docR Posted July 17 Share Posted July 17 Should've called it the Ambassador's Browser Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K4sum1 Posted July 17 Author Share Posted July 17 15 hours ago, docR said: Should've called it the Ambassador's Browser I don't want to steal the name https://github.com/ascrod/ambassador Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 @NotHereToPlayGames If you will use this browser consider the benefit of the sandbox level (7) above that found in the Mozilla Wiki: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox Superior to IL Low. I cannot translate it because in my language I assume it has a different meaning than in English. However, just use PE to verify If you want to check the sandbox level: about:support 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NotHereToPlayGames Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 49 minutes ago, Sampei.Nihira said: @NotHereToPlayGames If you will use this browser So far, I'm not interested. Way way way too much "telemetry". 100-some connections made just by opening the browser! And I've heard it can be lowered to 20 or 30. That's still 20 or 30 too many. No thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 (edited) **** Edited September 4 by Sampei.Nihira 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romca Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 There is some security risk with using the r3dfox web browser. Malicious code of the Trojan horse type was detected by analysis of 360 Total security, ClamAV, Jiangmin antivirus engine in the current version of the browser. Is this a false positive? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sampei.Nihira Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 (edited) Certainly an FP. Try parsing the installer(I scanned the x64 installer),and you will notice that JangMin (AV which is certainly not the most reliable) now considers it clean. Some AVs in VT have problems parsing compressed files. Edited August 6 by Sampei.Nihira 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romca Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 Thank you Sampei.Nihira for your response. I would be happy if it was a false positive. The test with the installation file turned out differently than using the compressed file. By the way, even the alternative Supermium browser is not without problems, while the Thorium browser was clean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.Draker Posted August 6 Share Posted August 6 (edited) 13 hours ago, Romca said: There is some security risk with using the r3dfox web browser. Malicious code of the Trojan horse type was detected by analysis of 360 Total security, ClamAV, Jiangmin antivirus engine in the current version of the browser. Is this a false positive? Honestly, I'd wait for the author to answer, don't listen to the strangers.* *That guy, especially. Edited August 6 by D.Draker 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED_Sln Posted August 7 Share Posted August 7 Many antiviruses don't like any sfx modules at all. Even in the original 7z.sfx from 7zip some antiviruses find something. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.b251015fc522288a9691c6db583793fd.jpg){kind=tracking}
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now