Saxon Posted April 2 Posted April 2 13 hours ago, D.Draker said: Win32ss finally confessed. But no apologies for not telling the public before. "... the most important of the sandboxes, so there will be further work to be done there." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/1292#issuecomment-2770908088 Bur still no hotfix for the public. The browser runs fully unprotected, be warned. 4
user57 Posted April 2 Posted April 2 10 hours ago, Klemper said: We're already far beyond that point, the new Chinese browser based on v.136 works absolutely perfect with Vista. Been testing it for weeks now. No memory leaks, all is good. No buffer overflow like in Supermium. "vista" , supermium was for XP i have to point out again its 15 times as much to go backwards to XP as to go back to from win7 to vista the most liked just the idea what supermium also works on the other operating systems
Klemper Posted April 2 Posted April 2 14 hours ago, user57 said: "vista" , supermium was for XP i have to point out again its 15 times as much to go backwards to XP as to go back to from win7 to vista the most liked just the idea what supermium also works on the other operating systems Why do I get notification for your replies? I think it was another member who tagged you. @ED_Sln and @D.Draker, they ordered a version for Vista from the Chinese student, he made it after a couple of hours, and it runs on Vista WITHOUT SP!!! How long did it take for Supermium to geat there? Several years? And it's super buggy. Write to the Chinese student, probably he will make one for your XP, but it will take a bit longer, three hours, maybe... 1
Klemper Posted April 2 Posted April 2 On 4/1/2025 at 7:59 PM, Dave-H said: With respect, that's not what @NotHereToPlayGames was saying. What he was saying was that if exactly the same modifications were made to other Chromium browsers as have been made to Supermium, for whatever reasons, then the Twitch login would almost certainly break there too. I'm sure that win32ss is investigating the reason why this is happening. Respectfully, I apologise, but @NotHereToPlayGames has no way of knowing what was or wasn't done or changed in Supermium at all. All what he wrote here is speculations, not facts. And how does he know that any modifications were done to the Java engine of the browser at all? It's Java what is not working for the login window, I'm pretty sure you perfectly understand that. There was no need to meddle with the Java engine just to make the browser work on XP. It's nonsense. So far, all facts, including the ability to log in from oldish versions, similar imports to the v.124, non- working sandbox, etc. all point out to the outdated browser core, and @NotHereToPlayGames can't prove otherwise. With huge respect. 1
NotHereToPlayGames Posted April 2 Posted April 2 (edited) Please learn how to read GitHub "commits". Edited April 2 by NotHereToPlayGames
D.Draker Posted April 2 Posted April 2 11 hours ago, NotHereToPlayGames said: Java engine is not why Twitch is not working in Supermium. CSS is why Twitch is not working in Supermium. 11 hours ago, Klemper said: All what he wrote here is speculations, not facts. No, this is "your side" of this BS Debate! You can't see past the veil you've pulled over your own eyes. Learn how to read GitHub changelogs. Supermium v126 is based off of Chromium v126. Supermium v132 is based off of Chromium v132. TO CLAIM ANYTHING OTHERWISE ONLY REVEALS ONE DOESN'T KNOW HOW TO READ GITHUB "COMMITS". CSS? Show us! Member, do I really need to report you? Your profile now 99% consists of your favourite "BS" words. 2
NotHereToPlayGames Posted April 2 Posted April 2 Go for it. You don't think they already know how "BS" this thread has become?
NotHereToPlayGames Posted April 2 Posted April 2 (edited) D.Draker - GREAT JOB at creating one of the BIGGEST "unproveable" (both "sides" will always see it "their way" no matter what the "other side" has 'proven' or 'disproven') CONSPIRACIES to ever hit MSFN! Learn how to read GitHub "commits". Edited April 2 by NotHereToPlayGames 1
user57 Posted April 2 Posted April 2 47 minutes ago, Klemper said: Why do I get notification for your replies? I think it was another member who tagged you. @ED_Sln and @D.Draker, they ordered a version for Vista from the Chinese student, he made it after a couple of hours, and it runs on Vista WITHOUT SP!!! How long did it take for Supermium to geat there? Several years? And it's super buggy. Write to the Chinese student, probably he will make one for your XP, but it will take a bit longer, three hours, maybe... since i dont know this guy i would say you are doing this, you really should
Dave-H Posted April 2 Posted April 2 This thread is now locked until the next Supermium version is released, which might give some answers to resolve this pointless and increasingly personal argument, where neither side can be proved. Thank you for your patience in this matter. 2
Dave-H Posted May 3 Posted May 3 Supermium 132.0.6834.222 R3 has just been released. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/releases/tag/v132-r3 Release notes - Supermium 132 has been updated to Chromium ESR version 132.0.6834.222, including all security patches and other fixes incorporated in this version, in addition to: (#670) Flag #show-managed-ui has been added to toggle the presence of "managed by your organisation" in various parts of the browser when enterprise policies are in effect (#1258) Links to external applications should now work with Safe Browsing disabled/ungoogled-supermium enabled (#1306) Further changes to favicon positioning; they should be fixed in place now (#1292) Sandbox fully restored for all users (#1280) Drag-and-drop disabled on NT 5.x due to various responsiveness issues A new flag, named #supermium-tab-options has been added with support for multiple tab options: v109-style tabs, v60-style tabs, CR23-style tabs and rectangular tabs. The tabs can also be made smaller with the #compact-ui flag. 3
mjd79 Posted May 3 Posted May 3 Indeed, the sandbox is fixed. #supermium-tab-options works fairly decently, although v109 mode has minimal bugs (at least on 7 SP1 with Aero).
Jody Thornton Posted May 3 Posted May 3 I still find the tab bar is too high, and the transport buttons are so small. I just wished win32 would have kept the same UI as 126 R7
Jody Thornton Posted May 3 Posted May 3 1 hour ago, Dave-H said: Have you tried #compact-mode in the flags? Yes. That flags did not make any difference. Then I tried #compact-ui, but that was really small. Too small actually. For what it's worth, I'm using Supermium on a Dell Inspiron 1420 notebook with Vista Home Basic. I have enabled flags for classic interface, and native user interface elements (both of which appear to make no difference). @Dave-H are you getting the same interface that you had with v126 R7?
Recommended Posts
Please sign in to comment
You will be able to leave a comment after signing in
Sign In Now