bphlpt Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 Thanks for the clarification/reminder den. I stand corrected. Cheers and Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eGo®Z Posted June 3, 2014 Share Posted June 3, 2014 (edited) 3. Compress to SFX EXE file. Delta compression optional. Where to get an info on it (guide and tools)? I meant "Delta compression optional" I just need to repack few older hotfixes for using in regular Windows XP (f.e. KB2095711, it has ProductSuit ==EmbeddedNT restriction) Edited June 3, 2014 by eGo®Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
egrabrych Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 I installed five of harkaz's modified updates yesterday.KB2953522 (IE8), KB2932079 (.NET 2.0), KB2931365 (.NET 4.0), KB2931352 (.NET security update), and KB2926765 (XP security update). All seemed well, but a while after the updates were installed, the machine suddenly blue screened.The stop error was 0x0000004E, PFN_LIST_CORRUPT, apparently thrown by ntoskrnl.exe.On restart, the machine seemed OK again. However this morning, after booting up and leaving it for a while, I found it with another BSOD.This time the stop error 0x00000044, MULTIPLE_IRP_COMPLETE_REQUESTS. Any ideas? I am a bit suspicious of KB2931352, as that seemed to replace a lot of .NET files, including some that were from ten years ago! What is the current status of patch for .NET Framework 1.1 marked KB2931352. Do BSOD after installing this patch are no longer present and you can install without worrying about the "side effects"?Primum non nocere! Was this Latin rule will be retained here?Thank you in advance for your reply Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
submix8c Posted June 4, 2014 Share Posted June 4, 2014 (edited) Um, egrabrych, you should read further from that post. It was a Symantec module -and- the Update program was further modded. Do read the WHOLE thread before raising issues that no longer exist. edit - in addition, might I recommend that the 1.1, then 2.0, then 4.0 be installed in that order, -providing- you have those dotNet versions installed. HTH Edited June 4, 2014 by submix8c Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dencorso Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 MS SB Advance Notification for June is out... there's 5 of them for Windows (but not necessarily all may apply to XP). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PRB Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 Bulletin 7 'Tampering'. Is that a regular category or likely to be something that defeats the POSReady registry hack? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harkaz Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 @ PRB They don't need to release a hotfix to prevent the POSReady tweak. They need to change the detection algorithm of their Windows Update Servers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dencorso Posted June 7, 2014 Share Posted June 7, 2014 On a finer reading we have: Bulletin #7 ("Tampering") surely is not even applicable to XP (since it's not applicable to Vista and both Servers 2k3 and 2k8) Bulletin #6 probably doesn't apply either (because it's not applicable to Server 2k3). So we're left with just 3 updates that apply. OTOH, Bulletin #3 applies to Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack Service Pack 3, so it may be useful for those using Office 97 or higher. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 (edited) Well, at the moment of this waiting 2 (two) days will allow everyone to read the actual Bulletin instead of (IMHO) wasting time in (still IMHO) nonsensical guesses through nitpicking on an "Advance Notification". Do check the But ... then, why? in my signature. jaclaz Edited June 8, 2014 by jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dencorso Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 But... then, why would MS even release those "Advance Notifications", if not for people to nitpick over them and/or hazard conflicting guesses, based solely on the meager info bits they provide? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaclaz Posted June 8, 2014 Share Posted June 8, 2014 But... then, why would MS even release those "Advance Notifications", if not for people to nitpick over them and/or hazard conflicting guesses, based solely on the meager info bits they provide?Hmmm.That may be the reason why "they" do it , but it is NOT a valid reason for "us" to fall for it. And now, for NO apparent reason, a fake Magritte : jaclaz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave-H Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted June 10, 2014 Share Posted June 10, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dencorso Posted June 11, 2014 Share Posted June 11, 2014 On a finer reading we have: Bulletin #7 ("Tampering") surely is not even applicable to XP (since it's not applicable to Vista and both Servers 2k3 and 2k8)Bulletin #6 probably doesn't apply either (because it's not applicable to Server 2k3).So we're left with just 3 updates that apply.OTOH, Bulletin #3 applies to Microsoft Office Compatibility Pack Service Pack 3, so it may be useful for those using Office 97 or higher. Now we know that Bulletin #7 == MS14-030 and Bulletin #6 == MS14-031 (and, BTW, Bulletin #5 == MS14-032) and that all my senseless hazarded guesses turned out to be right (and below I list which updates belong to which bulletins, including MS14-034 == Bulletin #3, the one that apples to MS Office Compatibility Pack SP3): KB2878233 MS14-036 Ogl.dll 12.0.6700.5000KB2957503 MS14-036 GdiPlus.dll 5.2.6002.23386KB2957509 MS14-036 Usp10.dll 1.420.2600.6557KB2957689 MS14-035 IE8 componentsKB2880513 MS14-034 Wordcnv.dll 12.0.6700.5000KB2939576 MS14-033 Msxml3.dll 8.100.1055.0 Msxml6.dll 6.20.2503.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now