Tripredacus

Certainly, this is your first post! Moving topic to appropriate forum.

I have doubts that it is directly related to the OS. I wonder what web technologies the internal server is using.... CGI? Java? Maybe they use some hack that IE8 can use but newer (more updated) browsers do not? Many ways to approach it. You can look here (if it is the same model you have) ftp://ftp.zyxel.com/VSG1432-B101/support_note/VSG1432-B101_1.0.pdf On (PDF) page 12, it shows how you can use telnet to configure it.

Verify they are in the same IP scope and subnet. Can the servers get to anywhere through the network?

Has anyone looked at the mini/memory dumps that Windows creates?

Sounds like you want to add a splash image?

Noel, do you even participate in the CEIP? I personally uncheck that whenever I first see it. If that is the case, you would figure that Windows Update would not offer KB2976978 to any computer where it isn't enabled.

Welcome to the MSFN!

You already have a topic here about this: http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/155700-editing-windows-7-setup-images-need-help/ However I can tell you that no one here will be helping you because of the possibility that you could be developing warez, as you do have a connection with such things. We can't help you with this problem.

Maybe irrelevant to MS or other companies, but we are seeing that there is an XP (and soon to be 7 I bet) community developing in the same vein as the 9x community. So all is not lost.

Seems to be a VIA or S3 chip: http://www.via-drivers.com/download-86C584-vgas3-driver-for-WindowsXP-32bit.html

Do not make the same post in multiple topics.

Do you want to use just the driver or the software? Are you using a RAID array?

So when you are booted into the Vista OS, I: is your boot volume? Also... do you have an explicit need for this device to function properly? This is one of the things I leave flagged in my home PCs.

Are you sure it really is closed and not just gone into the System Tray? Other IMs I use are similar, when closing them just makes the GUI go away... as if it is designed as such... I will note that sometimes it is difficult to get the GUI to re-appear again.

This gives an idea: https://forums.malwarebytes.org/index.php?/topic/139368-how-to-verify-that-mbae-is-working-correctly/

I've seen wireless routers come in these two flavors: 1. Has internal firewall to keep WLAN and LAN networks separate. 2. Assigns different Subnet Mask to WLAN and LAN, which effectively separates them.

This analogy doesn't work for desktop computing. MS has no actual need to woo a prospective customer by using the design of their product. People buy Windows because their software requires it. We do not have the luxury of changing to another OS like you can just change cars. Maybe MS is operating under the automobile analogy and that is where the problem is.

The inf hash is not present in the catalog. The Driver Package appears to be tampered.The Driver Package appears to be tampered but user wants to install it anyway.! sig: Verifying file against specific (valid) catalog failed! (0x80096002)! sig: Verifying file against specific Authenticode(tm) catalog failed! (0x800b0100)!!! dvi: Add Service: Binary 'I:\Windows\system32\DRIVERS\System32\Drivers\ipmlebl.sys' for service 'IPMLEBL' is not present.Have you modified this INF in any way? Doing so will break the digital signature.It can't find ipmlebl.sys... and I am unsure as to why the path looks like that. You may have a bad driver. And why is your Windows directory shown as I:\ ?

At this time I would consider it to be FUD/rumor. It is an old one too, read up the "answer" here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11573741/would-it-be-possible-for-microsoft-to-phase-out-the-win32-api-in-future-versions No one would be onboard with such a change at this point... Even now as MS is trying to get more people to make Modern apps rather than standard desktop ones, it is way too early to imagine MS would do that any time soon. Maybe in 10-20 years the OS will have evolved to that state and we will see something different then. If anything, I would expect that Win32 could be deemed "legacy" and no longer a Best Practice, but still remain functional as a compatibility option.

Oh but I need Java to play Minecraft! My security setup seems to work well enough, but I don't get so crazy about it. I have UAC enabled, Windows firewall, MSSE and then the firewall in the router. It is maybe my browsing habits that are a little different. My primary browser is a Mozilla type (Firefox or Palemoon) with NoScript. That addon does well enough to block any sort of thing from entering from a webpage. However, I will not compromise my computer's security to ensure that a website works correctly... For example, if there is some site that I want to use (or currently use) that generates an XSS warning, and thus is not operable without using an exception... I won't use it until the warning no longer exists. This happened a few years ago on Facebook, where I decided to stop using certain apps because they were using XSS. The response from the support group was to add an exception to allow apps on Facebook to use XSS! I use other browsers for specific thing. IE is used for Microsoft related websites only... Chrome is used primarily for Google related sites like Youtube. I have MBAM installed but I only use it if I suspect something is up. When I do repairs or virus cleaning for friends or family, I typically recommend they use Chrome as their browser. It seems to do a good enough job stopping attacks from coming in through the web. And that is really the #1 source of infections these days. Very few people are still using actual email clients, and now are using web-based versions instead. Outlook and Outlook Express used to be virus havens!

In my experience, it is usually the CPU that is the most reliable part in a computer (except maybe the power cord). I've definately need CPUs operate in the way you describe, but then I've also seen where a CPU may act strange in one board and then fine in another board. It was just recently a co-worker was working with a notebook that had problems working properly in WinPE. No part swaps fixed it except for changing the CPU. It was actually the first time I've encountered a scenario where the CPU was at fault for WinPE problems.... usually it is bad RAM.

Not really.

Hopefully some information regarding the installation of this driver can be found in the log file at c:\windows\inf\setupapi.dev.log.

I didn't get to read it either, that's why I only commented on the topic title.

See if this topic helps any. It mentions IvyBridge boards where USB3 works fine. http://www.msfn.org/board/topic/172720-can-windows-xp-be-installed-on-ivy-bridge-intel-cpu/