Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Tripredacus
-
I have never seen the tab for disabling autoplay before. It always annoyed me that it wasn't in XP (or maybe idk where it is?) and I used it in 98, and using SHIFT to bypass autoplay (which still works in XP) also triggers the StickyKeys program.
-
Typically, the video is not available message is caused by one of two things: 1. Youtube is doing website maintenance. You can check this by going to Youtube.com and it will have a colored bar at the top of the screen below the search if there is any maintenance being performed. 2. The video was removed by Youtube. This usually happens concerning IP content that isn't legally allowed on Youtube in the first place, like movies, advance movie trailers, exclusive content, music videos, episode parts. Youtube doesn't hunt for these types of videos, but removes them usually because the IP owners (movie, record and other companies) find them and request them to be removed. Different companies appear to audit Youtube on certain schedules, and if you frequent the site enough, you will be able to see the video deletion pattern for specific types of videos.
-
I've had similar problems after sorting large amounts of data. I think it has to do with caching data into memory like file names and the meta data that Windows can display in the tooltip if you hover a file. In every time a reboot made the problems go away. I've only had the strange black squares (and eventual context menu display corruption) occurr after moving large amounts of files around, but it could also be caused by another program. What is happening is that explorer is supposed to display a transparency (like an alpha channel) but it does not have enough resources to display it, so it elects not to and you actually "see" the alpha channel/transparency layer of the GUI instead of it being clear. Its kind of a lacking in image technology since all images still rely on coordinates and having to be 4 sided squares or rectangles, as there are no true dynamic images.
-
Wouldn't it be easier to manage your power settings for the machine through group policy? I may end up taking a look into that. I am shifting roles from being the server guy to being the Vista guy and I was just given the MS RK book. Anything to make it easier I suppose. If they are set through GP will that stop the settings from being reset during the upgrade? It isn't a big issue for me because I will be doing only one or two more image updates, but I wanted to post that it does happen.
-
What CDs have you tried booting from? Can you boot from your Windows CD? Typically, the inability to boot is a hardware problem.
-
Also, @ThreadOP, you don't NEED to buy Windows 7 the instant it comes out!
-
I suppose on the Vista machines you have already had them stop being in a workgroup right?
-
Are you using certified hardware? We only run 2008 on certified hardware because we also tried running it on "our old system" and it didn't work properly.
-
It is possible that your drive is indeed failing. It is also possible to make Chkdsk destroy a HDD by constantly running it! Back when I worked for a college, my co-worker made up a lab environ where he ran CHKDSK over and over for about 10 hours on a machine, and the total good sectors started at 100% and he got it down to 36% by the time he left to go home. So if your disk is going bad (physically bad and not file-system bad) chkdsk has the capability of destroying it on you. If you feel that it is indeed failing you should mirror it (image) to a replacement drive.
-
How do I reintall XP Home on a Dell and get it to activate?
Tripredacus replied to ZenCoder's topic in Windows XP
If the COA (cd-key) has already been activated once, you need to call the Microsoft number that is on your activation screen because the online activation server can't reactivate a COA. -
This is more of a report than a question, but you can discuss it if you like. I've spent the last few (business) days making a new image for Vista Business and integrating SP1 and testing. Our base image was Vista Business RTM volume license and power settings of disable hibernate, disable sleep, and do not require a password on resume. If you don't disable the password on resume, if your account doesn't have a password and the computer goes to sleep, when you wake it, it disables your account and the only thing you can do is reboot (with the reset switch). So I loaded on SP1, and after it was all done I let it sit overnight. I come in the next day (Friday) and found the account was locked out after "turned it on" which actually it was hibernating and I did not realise it because the power light was off. I went in and checked the Power Options and indeed all the settings I had in my RTM image had been reset to defaults, which meant I had to set them all again. So if you are experiencing this issue as well, you aren't alone.
-
Or have never looked into what caused said problems, and just blamed it on Vista. Or try to run it on substandard/minimum specs. Do you remember how Windows 2000 ran on minimum specs?
-
btw running the setup.exe won't give you a demo32 error!
-
PC switches back on by itself after powering off
Tripredacus replied to gui_m's topic in Hardware Hangout
In the power section of the BIOS, you may see a "Resume" option. If it is enabled, it allows you to choose from a series of numbers. One of our customers uses this because the PC doesn't always turn on after a power failure, so they used it to make sure it turned on. I don't know how it works or what the numbers mean, but I know you can just try disabling that. The name is different in various BIOSes but its usually under the ACPI type (S1 or S3). -
I'd like to make a note regarding all the talk about the progress bar. I recently updated my PE image using the new servicing tools provided in the new OPK version. I am sure it made other changes, but one stood out. When you are upping or dropping an image now, instead of it updating the % and time remaining on a single line, it now draws a new line with the new % in 1% increments! This might make it easier to make the progress bar work? IDK but it sounds like a start. If you were to use, say autoit, we know it can read stuff of the screen (like how people use it to make bots for games), but is this possible: 1. Press enter to start imaging drive C 2. gImageX does not suppress the cmd prompt it is running the command from, but puts it behind the HTA (window) layer. 3. The script read line info from the cmd prompt behind GImageX. 4. The progressbar determines how to display based on info received from script. Obviously I am partly mixing up its screen reading functionality with its other features... I think, while I am on the subject, I will contact our rep to see if the PE puts that progress info into a memory location that can be read.
-
How to integrate KB940510?
Tripredacus replied to MAVERICKS CHOICE's topic in Unattended Windows Vista/Server 2008
iirc WGA is not a distributable update, since it has an end-user agreement you must accept. It is targetted at users who already have their computer, and not for system builders to integrate. We got into a discussion with our rep when he found out we were installing Windows Updates on some computers via the website, instead of using the media they send us. Since we are not given WGA at all, we were told we are not supposed to put it on there because the end-user has to be the one to accept the agreement. -
Vista takes ages to open unc path on xp share
Tripredacus replied to dubsdj's topic in Windows Vista
On our Vista machines, that is how we are able to disable the Receive Window Auto-Tuning feature. -
Vista takes ages to open unc path on xp share
Tripredacus replied to dubsdj's topic in Windows Vista
Yes. Try unchecking the boxes for Link-Layer Topology Discovery Mapper I/O Driver and Link-Layer Topology Discovery Responder under the properties of your network adapter and see if you see an increase in speed. -
Regardless of whether a USB hub is powered or not it will not fix your problem. As someone already suggested, if anything it will make it worse (probably make no difference). I think that you have a (laptop) hardware or (corrupted) driver problem. You shouldn't get BSODs no matter how big the file you're transferring is. Can you try your HDD on someones else's PC and see how it operates then? Also can you try another (similar) USB device on your PC? If you can do this test you may be able to confirm its on the laptop 100% (which it sounds like it is - still good to have evidence when you talk to Acer). After that I'd be getting it checked under your warranty. Probably best to confirm that it does actually have USB 1.1 just in case the BSOD isn't totally related? A PCMCIA may or may not fix your problem. If you only have USB 1.1 ports then it will, but I still don't think the BSODs are good (and it may not solve them). I'm not familiar with laptops but most desktops have to have USB set to "HiSpeed" in BIOS for USB 2.0 to work - although by default I imagine it would already be set like that. Thanks JedMeister for your reply, Now i have already tried the hard disk in question(Seagate freeagent) on another laptop running windows vista premium.....it had no problem on it.. i obtained a data transfer speed of more than 28mb/sec on it.... With respect to my laptop.. it is still under extended warranty... but what exactly is the error then only those buggers will have a look at it.. can you help me regarding that... Can BIOS upgrade help.... as the laptop is almost 2 years old.... How exactly can you distinguish between USB1.1 and USB 2.0?... i mean is there any physical difference between them? Thanks again The only way you can tell is when you plug a device in, a box comes up saying that the device can perform faster... The port itself looks the same and even the entries in device manager can have the same names between 1.1 and 2.0. At least with 1.0, the device names were different.
-
WAIK Exception from HRESULT: 0x800F0823
Tripredacus replied to lousen's topic in Unattended Windows Vista/Server 2008
Don't you mean WSIM (Windows System Image Manager) and not WAIK? -
Line 52 of the INF file \i386\winnt.sif is invalid
Tripredacus replied to kzaman's topic in Unattended Windows 2000/XP/2003
I totally understand that, but when you've had to be an enterprise programmer, you are taught to use one method or the other. -
Typically x64 can see more than 3.2GB of RAM so you wouldn't need to use any switch. x86 cannot "see" more than 3.2GB in most cases.
-
Might as well be running it on eeePC So far I am still waiting to get my hands on the 8GB EEE PC. I've only gotten the 4GBs so far... They work with XP Pro and can only be imaged with ImageX and not the GHost we use. They are cool little things for sure.
-
After disabling RRAS, I started getting this error MORE frequently. I even disabled it on the other server as well. I was still getting the error, so I turned RRAS back on, and while I still get the error, I am not getting it as often...