Jump to content

Dave-H

Super Moderator
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5,374

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    68

  • Donations

    0.00 USD 

  • Country

    United Kingdom

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Dave-H

  1. Dave-H
    Thanks @D.Draker and @jaclaz Sorry, yes of course, wrong terminology there, I'm very good at that if you remember! The enclosure is a high quality one and not that old, so I would be very surprised if it was that, also the eSATA cable was replaced recently with a new good one too. The same hardware worked fine with the previous 2TB disk. I'm hoping the error message I was seeing has now gone away, I updated the driver on the eSATA interface card, and I hope that's fixed it. This was only on Windows 10 of course, so actually off-topic here. I only mentioned it in case it gave any clues. The main problem is getting XP to see the drive at all in Disk Manager! It could be because the Core Storage Volumes Driver isn't running, but as I said, I have no idea what that driver actually does. I will investigate with FileMon and Process Monitor as suggested. If I don't get anywhere with that, I will try formatting with smaller partitions and see if the disk is then seen. Thanks again for the responses. Cheers, Dave.
  2. Dave-H
    @jaclaz @Cixert Any input here? The only thing apparently wrong with the HFS installation is that I'm getting an error message on every boot in the System Event Log. It says that "The Core Storage Volumes Driver service failed to start due to the following error: The system cannot find the file specified." I don't know what that service is supposed to do, I can't find much information about it. The strange thing is, what file can't it find? Its registry entry points to system32\drivers\csvol.sys and csvol.sys is present and correct in that folder, where you would expect it to be. I have checked that it's the correct 32 bit version, and it is. This is very puzzling, any help would be appreciated! Thanks, Dave.
  3. Dave-H
    Sorry to bump, but I have a problem with a 3TB disk I've just bought to replace by old 2TB archive disk, which is showing signs of dying. The drive is in a StarTech external enclosure, but connected by eSATA, not by USB. The eSATA connection is via a Silicon Image add-in card. I have formatted the drive as GPT using Windows 10, and it works fine there, although I'm getting occasional errors in the event log - "The IO operation at logical block address 0x5bc5e0 for Disk 4 (PDO name: \Device\Scsi\SI31121Port5Path0Target0Lun0) was retried." I'm not sure if that indicates a problem or not. The main issue is with Windows XP of course. I have installed Paragon HFS for Win v.10.5.0.95, which seems to be working OK. However, although the disk appears correctly in Device Manager as a disk drive, and shows no errors unless you try to populate the volumes on it, it does not appear at all in Disk Management, so I can't assign a drive letter to it. Anyone any idea why that might be? Thanks, Dave.
  4. Dave-H
    Working again now!
  5. Dave-H
    Yes, it seems to have failed again. I'm on it!
  6. Dave-H
    @D.Draker Should be fixed now!
  7. Dave-H
    @D.Draker Sorry for the delay in responding. Yes, there is a problem, I can't make a new topic either. I have reported it to xper. I guess it's something which went wrong after the last server outage. Cheers, Dave.
  8. Dave-H
    @D.Draker Is the problem still there?
  9. Dave-H
    Just as an aside, I have for quite a while now been using the latest script version of 'Fluff Busting Purity' on 360Chrome, with OrangeMonkey, which still works perfectly of course. As long as scripting extensions still work, I hope that's going to be an option for quite a while yet with some extensions.
  10. Dave-H
    I tried with an incognito window with uBlock enabled, and it still crashed. I also tried connected through ProxHTTPSProxy, and it still crashed. Sorry I should have mentioned before, as someone did earlier, that it works fine in Firefox 52.9, rather unexpectedly! Obviously it's not a site that many people would use, but I always think these things are worth reporting, as what fails on one webpage could easily fail on others.
  11. Dave-H
    Thanks. I end up with this, as I reactivated the chrome://error messages. I tried with the extensions disabled, but no change.
  12. Dave-H
    Does this page work OK for anyone with 360Chrome? https://downloadcenter.trendmicro.com/index.php?clk=left_nav&clkval=pattern_file&regs=nabu With version 2036 it appears to briefly load fine, then crashes.
  13. Dave-H
    Thank you!
  14. Dave-H
    I agree with you, the original Windows 10 Mail app was very good. Unfortunately, for me at least, it started malfunctioning very badly. I suspect it was fine with Outlook/Hotmail e-mails, that is to say Microsoft ones, but my main e-mail is Yahoo-based, and the mail app started just showing code for a lot of messages from it, or sometimes just the header, making it useless. There were a huge number of complaints online about this, so I wasn't the only one with the problem, but it quickly became evident that Microsoft had no intention of fixing it, as the app was about to be replaced with their shiny new Outlook app. I eventually did go over to the new Outlook app, and I have to say that it isn't that bad IMO. The one thing it won't (yet) do which is annoying is that there's no way of running it automatically in the background on boot, as you could with the Mail app.
  15. Dave-H
    That certainly needs checking, there's nothing worse for degrading display quality on a flat screen monitor than not running it at its native panel resolution! FWIW, I'm using version 2036 at 1920x1080, 60Hz. I am using 120 DPI 'large fonts', with a VGA connection when using my old ATI card. Fonts all look absolutely fine.
  16. Dave-H
    1440p plays a lot better, it doesn't keep stopping to buffer like 2160p does. There are occasional momentary freezes though, which don't happen on 1080p. All pretty much as expected. As an extra observation, the performance using Firefox 120 on 64 bit Windows 10 is really no better than when using 360Chrome on Windows XP. 1440p is smoother, but 2160p still freezes and buffers all the time. It's not my internet speed, as 2160p streaming is perfect on my smart TV.
  17. Dave-H
    This is a good example of a 4K HDR demo. There are loads of them around, and they all look stunning. It really struggles on my system, as I would expect, but if I wanted to see it in all its full glory, I would use the YouTube app on my 4K smart TV to watch it anyway!
  18. Dave-H
    There are many extensions to use with YouTube. I'm not familiar with that one, but I would be surprised if it's better than Enhancer for YouTube, which does everything I need, with really good controls.
  19. Dave-H
    4K YouTube struggles a bit on my system, but 1080p is fine.
  20. Dave-H
    @dmiranda Thanks for the information about the current status of Enhancer for YouTube. I didn't know that development had stopped, temporarily I hope. The version I attached is the last that will work on 360Chrome anyway due to manifest version changes, but I use the latest version on Windows 10 in Edge and Firefox. Strangely, despite what the developer has said, it seems to be still working fine for me with the latest Firefox.
  21. Dave-H
    YouTube is absolutely fine for me. I have 8GB of RAM fitted, but my 32 bit XP installation can only see 3GB of course. Try installing this extension, which can get rid of a lot of the bloat which slows down YouTube. Note that this is the last usable version on this browser. 360Chrome Enhancer for YouTube Extension 2.0.115 (Last for 360Chrome).crx
  22. Dave-H
    @dmiranda Please do not embed such long scripts in posts. I have re-saved it as an attachment.
  23. Dave-H
    To answer your (apparently now removed) question, of course potential security vulnerabilities can be discussed here, as long as they directly relate to the browser version being discussed.
  24. Dave-H
    I wouldn't have thought that disabling integrity or security check warnings was a good idea on principle, unless it was absolutely necessary to make the software usable. From what I've read here, the warning would only impact people if they messed around with the files! I certainly wouldn't ever expect to see it.
  25. Dave-H
    Moved to 'Web Browsers' where it should really be.
×
×
  • Create New...