Dave-H

Anyone any thoughts on this?

There is a lack of respect for other members being shown in some posts here recently. May I remind everyone of Rule 7b. Consider this to be a warning.

Isn't this getting a bit off-topic for this thread guys?

Another puzzling thing has started happening on my copy of 360Chrome 13.5.2036.0. I do use the password remembering mechanism on non-critical websites, just for convenience. It has always worked as it should, automatically filling in the login information. I recently noticed that it was no longer doing this on some (but not all) sites. By pure chance, I've now discovered that if I switch the proxy on from the menu, which is ProxHTTPSProxy in my case, the logins appear again. If I go back to a direct connection and refresh the page, they vanish again! Anyone any idea why that would be? Have the sites in question perhaps changed their code such that they need the proxy to allow the display of the login information? The same sites' login information still appears fine on Thorium and Supermium with a direct connection. It;'s not a big deal, just annoying, the sites still login fine if I put the information in, it's just very puzzling why the automatic system is now malfunctioning.

OK, thanks.

OK, no problem. I just thought you might know, as you've presumably used r3dfox. I don't know whether you've used it on XP of course!

@Sampei.Nihira Just a very quick off-topic aside, do you happen to know which version of r3dfox is the most recent to work on XP (32 bit)? The latest one certainly doesn't work, and the others say they've not been tested on XP.

In XP. I don't use 360Chrome on Windows 10.

Thanks all, the user agent modification has indeed fixed it. Very bad design though for it to just not load with the original version. Most incompatible sites put up a page saying that you need to update your browser. Doing what they were doing just looks lake some other type of fault.

Thanks everyone, I will give the UA fix a try and report back tomorrow. Just off to bed!

Could someone using 360Chrome please try this site for me? www.bbcpa.org.uk In my copy of 360Chrome 13.5,2036.0 it won't load, it either produces a connection error or just sticks on the new tab page. I'm pretty sure that it used to work! It's fine in Thorium and Supermium on XP. Thanks, Dave.

Any further posts in this conversation and this thread will be locked.

OK, this is getting personal, and that must stop please. This thread is to discuss technical aspects of the Supermium browser, not to have a debate about who may or may not have 'borrowed' code or ideas from whom. If you want to discuss this further, take it to PMs. Any continuation of the present discussion will be deleted.

@IDA-RE-things This is not our issue, and there's no reason for people here to feel that they need to take up cudgels on your behalf. You and win32s(s) are on GitHub, and this issue, if it merits it, should be raised and resolved there. FWIW, as far as I can see the 'borrowing' of someone else's code is something which should be asked for in advance as a matter of courtesy, and acknowledged by the 'borrower', and in many cases I'm sure that would be accepted by the code's originator, even with closed source projects. If those niceties were not observed in this case, that's regrettable, but it's between you and win32s(s) and should be resolved on GitHub, not here.

It's not there in Chrome 126.

Not set.

It appears not. I assume I don't have to do anything to enable it.

OK, I tried both DLLs on Supermium, playing 4K video full screen on YouTube, and I could see no significant difference with the performance. They were both juddery, but perfectly watchable. 1080 HD is fine with both of them. Are there any other tests I can do to compare them?

Thanks @VistaLover that's really useful background information, very helpful to anyone who's puzzled by all the different versions of the DLLs which are floating around! Version 1.2.0.5065, with its two sister DLLs, is working very well on my system, with Supermium and Thorium. I will give version 1.1.0.5018 a try (I assume it doesn't need the other two DLLs or the extra startup switches) and see how it goes.

Thanks, all working fine (on Thorium too).

I've just updated to Supermium 124.0.6367.245, and it seems to be working fine on XP SP3 x86. It didn't however work with the version of progwrp.dll that I was using before, which was 1.2.0.5058. When I changed to the version which was bundled with the browser, which was 1.1.0.5016, it all came good. Is that the best version to use, or is there a better one?

Off-topic posts removed. Name change requests only here, please, and comments directly relating to them.

@ClassicNick Posts cleaned. I see you have already asked about changing your username in the appropriate thread. Unfortunately, I cannot do this for you, only the supervisor @Tripredacus can now do it. If you don't hear from him in the name changing thread in the next few days, try sending him a PM. He should pick up the request though, so be patient!

I'm using uBlock Origin 1.58.0 with the SSE4 version of Thorium Legacy on XP, and it seems to be working fine.

Fair enough. It was our talk about Android browsers that I was mainly saying was off-topic. As you why sync still works on Thorium and Supermium if it's not supposed to, I have no idea, I'm just glad that it does work!