eyeball

If i remember rightly the last time i did a 330 i had to integrate the textmode driver into the cd (i think at the time i had no usb floppy to hand). the link Mr Snub provided will help you find the driver you need. Thanks

I would love to know how many of you have deployed and managed both of these products in a corporate environment. Has anyone honestly used both? (Personally i have done one of the two so i will not comment on on Vs the other)

gOber, this is completely off-topic, but do you have a "ram optimizer" in that screenshot?

Excellent, downloading it right now. Thank you!

Thanks for that does anyone else have any recommendations or should i go with ImgBurn?

Hi all, can anyone recommend a good piece of freeware burning software i can use with Vista? I want one that can handle lots of file types (including .nrg if possible) and one that does NOT install a virtual CD/DVD drive. Thanks for any help

Windows Vista should say on the box "New SMB 2.0 protocol - Transfer files upto 10X faster over IPv6" and "IO completion ports, and IO Canecellation functionality", "better memory management" and "Fairer thread Execution on cpu's thanks to Cpu time cycle counters"....ect; Microsoft really should let the end users know what they are buying and they *might* appreciate it more than just saying (as someone mentioned) "Its a new skin on the same OS".

FYI, for codec problems download a program called G-Spot. It can detect what codec a file is encoded with (among many other things). Thanks

Sorry, under the printing preferences you can usually disabled advanced printing features there. If not i think its under the advanced tab, (its one of the checkboxes underneath the driver box) Thanks

Disable advanced features on the driver and see if that helps, if not try the universal HP PCL 5 or PCL 6 driver and see if they are any better

You dont mention the model of printer or the driver it is currently using. That would be really helpful Thanks

Nicely done! and i agree with you, it should be your decision to trash your machine. There should be an easy way to turn it off in advanced system properties, but it should warn you or something. Its not fair otherwise.

So when you double click on the computer are the shares shown? I just need to establish this in order to know what to do next

Thats ok , no problem

I believe this decision in X64 vista is to help people move over to Vista and 64 bit without issue. 80% of Bluescreens or there abouts are caused by 3rd party drivers. The average end user doesnt realise this and immediately blames Microsoft (and subsequently switches back to XP). So IMO what Microsoft did here is a smart move. What is it your trying to install that you cant btw?

NTUSER.DAT is the registry hive you see under HKCU. You cannot copy it whilst logged on as that user as it will currently be mounted. You must create another user. Reboot and log on as them to be able to copy the profile

You need to adjust the metric of the wireless connection to be higher than that of the wired network. Under advanced TCPIP properties give the wireless network a metric of "1" and the wired a metric of "2" and see what happens.

Check the eventlogs (start -> run -> eventvwr) for any errors relating to disk, incase it is failing, Also visit www.ultimatebootcd.com and download that. Boot from the CD and run memtest86+ to see if you have problems with your memory. good luck

You metion "connecting to the pc" but you dont say how. Are you using a standard UNC path to connect to it e.g \\SERVER\SHARE ? and if so what do you see at that point? are any shares enumerated?. Have you also opened the file and print sharing ports on the XP firewall on the print server? Thanks

I normally use angry ip scanner if i need a quick simple scan. Just google it

I notice your Signature is "Tweaking with Vishal".............. maybe thats the problem right there. Especially since Crahak cant seem to reproduce the bugs. Just food for thought

What antivirus did you have?

I dont know of a way to use a different one than the one specified in IE options. However 2 reg files that import different proxy settings might be a way you could do this?

He shouldnt need a static route for this to work, His VPN is clearly up at this point, the traffic will know where to go, infact all traffic will now go via the VPN instead of the local subnet. However the firewall is a good point. If you do an ip scan of the 192.168.10/24 subnet once you are VPN'd in does anything reply? If not i wonder if you have forwarded GRE through the firewall too? Im pretty sure it wouldnt have let you get this far but its something to check.

Just to clarify: You wish to use a different proxy ONLY when you play warcraft? and then revert back to the standard one you have for everything else?