Everything posted by patchworks
-
Totally agree: a more strict collaboration with open source projects like ROS would benefit all.
-
Universal VBE Video Display Driver (for Windows NT Architecture) may help...
-
Given that I am NOT a developer (much less a Kernel one), couldn't ReactOS core components be (easily?) "ported" instead of reimplementing everything from scratch?
-
Check this (cool) open source tool: https://github.com/valinet/ExplorerPatcher
-
-
The best way is to ask hardware manufacturers to fund the project, IMHO; Lenovo, for example, could be interested...
-
Official website: http://www.reactos.org/
-
-
-
Just discovered it, hope that helps: Official homepage AT&T's Research Projects page
-
OK, this is a related-news that could be interesting for both projects: Hope that helps, or at least inspires !
-
Just found this interesting article: http://www.intowindows.com/download-exact-windows-7-shell32-for-xp/ Dunno if it's possible to do the same for Kex'd 98, btw hope that inspires !
-
I just discovered that IBM released (the source code of their Workplace Shell for Windows: Source code has been released under a proprietary "Workplace Shell For Windows" Public License - v 1.0 Togheter with BeOSWin (attached - public domain ? - sources), could be a good base for an alternative open source shell for Win 9x, IMHO. Hope that helps, or at least inspires ! beoswsrc.zip
-
Dunno if anyone already knows it (search gives no matches), btw it seems very interesting: Official website SF.net's project page Hope that inspires !
-
I tested W7/64 and honestly i don't like it, so do you think it's possible to "port" the better things from Win7/64 to XP64 to revive it ?
-
From I, Hacker (on December 27, 2009): Direct links: http://github.com/callen/Alky-Reborn http://daeken.com/alky-postmortem
-
Italian, please, and Tango XP (or Crystal Clear) would be great.
-
I'm noticing problems in a/v synchronizations under XP 64. Can be an HPET problem ? Or, in other words, does XP 64 supports it ? Thanks in advice !Uhm, it would be great if someone "grabs" a package manager-like for serving KernelEx with 100% functional software (better if open source).Hey, guyz, I opened a 3ad about VLC+KernelEx @ VideoLAN Forums: http://forum.videolan.org/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=64425 Feedbacking is useful !True, VLC don't have mutch hardware optimizations integrated, but is still better 'cause don't install anything that overhead the system. You don't obtain better quality using the same codec but with a better one ! And note that FFDShow is FFMpeg based too......if you need to kill your Windows 9X/ME performances. If not, choose VideoLAN instead.If doubt that's true, but If so I (and probably Bill too, that's why he leaved) can understand now why Vista and 7 completely sucks.
