Jump to content

Dixel

Member
  • Posts

    2,372
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    189
  • Donations

    0.00 USD 
  • Country

    Netherlands

Everything posted by Dixel

  1. It's not normal, esp. for ungoogled, I read this odd delay maybe tied to the video driver, esp. outdated. For XP the golden drivers are the ones that made by iCafe. 347.26, 361.77.
  2. Maybe need to add to the topic's description, I feel people will still ask the same question over and over again, @Cocodile explained this has nothing to do with this browser.
  3. Thanks, interesting! And what about your famous cold boot 29 seconds slowness? Is it the same with this version on all of your computers?
  4. Looks like you and win32 are both sitting on on-board audio, I didn't have the mentioned issue with either of his versions, but I run a very old dedicated card, 15 years or so.
  5. Strange, do you use onboard audio or dedicated?
  6. Interesting, but still don't understand what does it have to do with HEVC mentioned in the title (H265). Will Nero understand this format?
  7. I don't remember when I said I don't use 360Chrome, you got me confused with someone else, nothing is hijacked since the Trojan message comes from the browser itself. Though, it's a bit different on XP and Vista. Did you have the chance to compare 1030 with 2044 with enough real life usage? Is it faster? Maybe not worth it? Or maybe worth to search for the cause?
  8. Then maybe simply remove it? It wouldn't a problem, would it? I guess the browser will only be faster, no?
  9. I don't use the ex-kernel, I only use it sometimes - locally, and it can't affect this browser. My Vista x64 is original, but I had to update it to run modern games from 2021, yes, I hate this fact, I don't like updates. I'm now at build 6003. I'm just curious, nothing more, but thanks.
  10. Interesting, it suggests you to download the latest version, mine doesn't, look. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185049-arcticfoxienotheretoplaygames-360chrome-v1352044-rebuild-1/?do=findComment&comment=1254004
  11. I didn't mix anything. But the issue is interesting since mixing would also trigger the warning. So, does it appear only when you're online?
  12. So perhaps some telemetry isn't completely removed in 2044, and it triggers the "trojan warning" reporter. Do you all get the Trojan warning while being online or offline? Perhaps the browser connects to China to verify the integrity, and "sees" it's not as it should be? Interesting. This would explain no warning on the original version.
  13. Thanks for yet another confirmation! Now both executables scan browser files and tell something's fishy with the rest of the files, interesting. So this is not "only Vista" related, like someone tried to imply earlier, I see you're on XP Pro x86.
  14. Could be they were simply ashamed, when we caught them lying.
  15. Apply the flags before, on a clean new profile, also some versions of Chrome understand --disable-encryption, not --disable-encryption-win. The second one is the same, namely --disable-machine-id.
  16. Did you try with the flags I posted here? You would need to test with a new profile! Applying the flags on old won't show the difference.
  17. Yes, but it was without the video!
  18. The error message in broken English comes from the browser itself! No protection installed on that PC. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broken_English
  19. It'd be very interesting to read your feedback regarding Supermium. You say it's heavy, what's your system? Answer here, please. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185045-supermium/page/
  20. I doubt, it had been discussed about the minimum requirement for 1607, it's most likely there will be missing dependencies, even if you unpack the installer. https://msfn.org/board/topic/185023-future-of-chromium-on-older-windows-10-versions-and-rtm/
  21. 13.5 1030 is much more stable than any of the 13.0 series, I think Dave would agree.
  22. The coincidence is strange, agree? 2044 doesn't run with the aforementioned Trojan scan suggestion, others that are based - do run.
  23. Boomers seem a bit old to be the parents of GenZ. Thank you for bringing it to our attention!
  24. If you read, it even tells which file is damaged, namely it's 360chrome. Why won't you simply tell what exactly you replaced it the .exe file? I mean, I can run any comparison tool, but it will just save time. don't you think?
×
×
  • Create New...