NotHereToPlayGames

Obviously (to me at least) a typo. If you're pointing out typos, then you missed "requsted".

It appears to me that the forum was reset to a January archive as far as settings and forum software but without loss of any "content" dated after that archive. Some aspects appear to have been reset to last November. For example, the list of members wiped out all "new members" (they were all FAKE anyway!) from December and January. There never was any new members past January. New members were not able to join until just a couple days ago, per that list of members. Unsure why ONE from January was still kept, as it too appears "fake". Along with the "repeat names" which are clearly fake as well. ie, if you see an angryduck and an angryduck22 both join on the same exact day, they are BOTH *fake*. xper is making appearances (ie, seeking donations), so maybe he'll shed actual light.

My previous job had me flying all over the country. 23 different states every year. Never *once* have I ever witnessed anybody taking a THERMOMETER through security. Never before 9/11. Never after 9/11. But sure, I fly a lot less nowadays, so maybe this is something new. Like eating Tide Pods. It's a whole new world. I know a kid (straight A's, honor student) *expelled* from school for three days for having a pair of NAIL CLIPPERS in his pocket. Some "zero tolerance" policy. I just laugh, you can what, injure a person three different ways with a pair of nail clippers? I can think of two hundred and three different ways to injure a person with a NUMBER TWO PENCIL.

Well, um, while I agree, there's so much to say here that I'm not going to waste "too much" of my time, just a little to "feed the beast" and get it off my chest. First, yeah, I used startpage about a decade or two ago and stopped because of ADS !!! But I'm smarter today about things like uBO and Stylus that while they may not "block" all of the ads (and telemetry tracking), they do keep them OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND. Second, and no offense, but all of the "just for profit" 'talk' here at MSFN as a whole kind of TICKS ME OFF !!! Without profit of some degree, we may as well all be living in the SIXTEEN HUNDREDS !!! (I'm not technically sure what century to use, but you get the idea.) Where are we gonna draw the line? I can point to AT LEAST a *DOZEN* posts here at MSFN biatching and moaning about "profits". WTF!? Is MSFN a "talk about technology" forum? Or a biatch and moan about politics &/or different styles of socio-economics? ??? ??? ??? Like SERIOUSLY, the FIRST person to "say that" here at MSFN should be PATTING HIMSELF ON THE BACK because "profits" have leaked into ALL TOPICS. Congratulations! Your anti-profit stance has gone VIRAL! !!! !!! !!! Don't INTENTIONALLY misread that! There IS a difference between X% profits versus Y% profits. But again, live in the DARK AGES if "profits" p#ss you off so much !!! If you don't like "profits", then don't live in a HOUSE (the GREEDIEST of all industries!), don't own a computer or phone, don't own a car, live NAKED and not wear clothes unless your yourself grew the cotton, loomed it into a fabric, and needle-and-thread'd it into shirts, pants, socks, and undergarments, don't eat at restaurants EVER, don't buy groceries to feed your family, don't ever give money to a CHURCH, just live under a bridge somewhere and solicit every passerby to feed you for the day. Don't ever ask them where they got the dollar they just GAVE YOU, just take it from them with a SMILE on your "greedy" face for wanting THEIR lifestyle able to feed not only themselves, but also FEED YOU. </rant over>

Interesting! Though I am surprised that INSTALLS are up. I tried the DDG "browser" and HATED IT! I do love their NON-AI search -- ht tps://noai.duckduckgo.com/?q=<string>

Also here: https://github.com/e3kskoy7wqk/Firefox-for-windows-7/issues/147

Appears to have already been reported: https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/issues/182

That (to me) DEFINITELY is tied to the "Title Bar" checkbox doing NOTHING in r3d 151.02. It's as if the "Title Bar" HEIGHT is set to ZERO or something to that effect. It appears CSS-related to me.

I only tried in XP (failed) and 11. In 11, when you right-click to customize, the "Title Bar" checkbox seems to do absolutely nothing. Unsure if it did anything in previous versions. edit: just checked in previous versions and this checkbox DOES work in previous versions Unsure if that is related to your issue or not, the Menu Bar looks the same to me in both versions. Are you having this issue ONLY when using your Luna XP Theme inside of Win7 ???

Your screencap "looks like" XP. So I tried to run r3d in XP and it doesn't work. Is that XP? Or something "made to look" like XP?

F

Well, it is called a Japanese Thai Hack. And that ad is for some "Japanese Trick".

Wow! I use Stylus and uBO both to prevent the ads and ad containers here at MSFN. I do that because some of the ads would get me FIRED if female coworkers took them out of context. I just disabled, reloaded the page, and got the below! Now then, imagine what a female coworker would think if she saw this but was standing too far away to read it was about Sleep Apnea.

I don't have a Facebook account (*zero* "social media" for me, can you imagine my OT-ish-ness on any of those types of sites, lol). BUT... Sounds to me like there is an *EASY* solution -- convert Facebook's "infinite scroll" to a PAGED VIEW instead. This is sctrictly AI-Generated, but using AI has always been a good STARTING POINT for me, but will require a Facebook account to test and adjust accordingly: // ==UserScript== // @name Facebook Scroll to Pages // @namespace https://example.com/ // @version 1.0 // @description Replace Facebook infinite scroll with manual page navigation // @match https://www.facebook.com/* // @grant none // ==/UserScript== (function () { 'use strict'; // Configuration const POSTS_PER_PAGE = 10; // Number of posts per page let currentPage = 1; let posts = []; // Utility: Create navigation buttons function createNavButtons() { const nav = document.createElement('div'); nav.style.position = 'fixed'; nav.style.bottom = '10px'; nav.style.right = '10px'; nav.style.zIndex = '9999'; nav.style.background = 'white'; nav.style.padding = '8px'; nav.style.border = '1px solid #ccc'; nav.style.borderRadius = '5px'; nav.style.fontSize = '14px'; const prevBtn = document.createElement('button'); prevBtn.textContent = 'Previous'; prevBtn.disabled = true; prevBtn.onclick = () => changePage(currentPage - 1); const nextBtn = document.createElement('button'); nextBtn.textContent = 'Next'; nextBtn.style.marginLeft = '5px'; nextBtn.onclick = () => changePage(currentPage + 1); nav.appendChild(prevBtn); nav.appendChild(nextBtn); document.body.appendChild(nav); return { prevBtn, nextBtn }; } // Change page function changePage(page) { if (page < 1) return; const totalPages = Math.ceil(posts.length / POSTS_PER_PAGE); if (page > totalPages) return; currentPage = page; renderPage(); // Update button states navButtons.prevBtn.disabled = currentPage === 1; navButtons.nextBtn.disabled = currentPage === totalPages; } // Render posts for current page function renderPage() { posts.forEach((post, index) => { const start = (currentPage - 1) * POSTS_PER_PAGE; const end = start + POSTS_PER_PAGE; post.style.display = (index >= start && index < end) ? '' : 'none'; }); } // Stop infinite scroll function disableInfiniteScroll() { window.onscroll = null; document.addEventListener('scroll', e => e.stopImmediatePropagation(), true); } // Initialize script function init() { disableInfiniteScroll(); // Collect posts posts = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('[role="article"]')); if (posts.length === 0) return; renderPage(); } const navButtons = createNavButtons(); // Wait for posts to load const observer = new MutationObserver(() => { const newPosts = Array.from(document.querySelectorAll('[role="article"]')); if (newPosts.length !== posts.length) { posts = newPosts; renderPage(); } }); observer.observe(document.body, { childList: true, subtree: true }); // Run after initial load window.addEventListener('load', init); })();

That has already been DENIED by @Tripredacus and @xper way back in March: https://msfn.org/board/topic/187750-sometimes-redirecting-to-spamgamble-site-when-accessing-msfnorgboard/page/4/#findComment-1285830 They are IN DENIAL that the problem is ON THEIR SERVER, they have PUBLICLY said so. And they "refuse" to admit that they were WRONG in that assessment.

Agreed... But remember, this was brought to their attention in FEBRUARY !!! We *HAVE* been patient! VERY patient!

You have your "tactics". I have mine. I really don't think it MATTERS anymore. That IS my FACT-BASED OBJECTIVE VIEW.

I am kind of waiting for them to LOCK THIS THREAD. Still not give any ANSWER. But LOCK THIS THREAD and see "that" as the only answer they "owe" us.

Death to MSFN, that's my view nowadays. "Poking the ribs" isn't working. If anything, it's seemingly having the exact opposite effect. You can keep referencing @xper @xper @xper @xper @xper and @Tripredacus @Tripredacus @Tripredacus @Tripredacus @Tripredacus until you are "blue in the teeth". "No answer is an answer." THEY DO NOT GIVE A SH#T. This is a NON-ISSUE to them or we would have ALREADY heard from them. Maybe not @xper, but we would have heard from @Tripredacus. THEY DO NOT GIVE A SH#T SH#T SH#T SH#T SH#T.

I interpreted your comment as "glass half FULL". I'm saying it "glass half EMPTY" (which is actually not my normal World View).

I've been keeping this comment in my back pocket and saving it for later. But I'll go ahead and voice it now. I have a strong "hunch" that both Brave and Mojeek will show ZERO results in the near future (2-3 *months*, not "weeks"). That the Japanese Thai Hack is just taking longer to "propogate" through their "index". And when it does, THEY TOO will do the same exact thing that Google did (ie, "nanny-state consumer-protect de-indexing"). I can't prove that. ONLY *TIME* will prove (or disprove). Just a very strong "hunch".

When I was on XP x64, I only ran 32bit browsers for purposes of lower RAM consumption. But nowadays, with the improved methods of memory management, that doesn't work as well as it used to.

I'm not finding accurate info regarding the "19.0.0". That IS what OFFICIAL Chrome also shows on my Win10. But "per spec", anything over 13.0 is supposed to indicate Win11.

For what it's worth, Supermium showing a BITNESS of 32 is a DEAD GIVEAWAY. Chrome has not released a 32bit version since 2018 with v69. At least by default, the user had to jump through some major hoops to obtain a 32bit version.

From what you just showed, THEY DO NOT MATCH. Your old-school user agent says you are on a 64bit machine, your client hints says you are on a 32bit machine. ie, the BITNESS content. Do not go by the "x86" listed in "arch", that is SUPPOSED to be "x86" even on 64bit machines, it says it's in Intel or AMD, it will say "arm" if not on Intel or AMD.