Destro

If you press the cart then press the magnifying glass it works as it should. Or just click the link https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/search?q=

Once again, in 2019 the proper way to do this is to slipstream SP4 and use ghosts pack or whatever after that, and the he doesn't even need to connect to windows update because it's done and contains all of the fixes already Additionally he would be able to connect to windows update if he wanted to add pos regs and he would never have problems to begin with. Or he could to slipstream like userhidden QFE post sp3 pack and then like seraphs, IE8 add on and pos addon, and then add regs and he would be able to just connect and only be left with a few updates to install. So once again it is 2019 and there is no reason to go about this like installing 1000 updates from WU that will take is PC 48 hours to complete and make it slow after he is done and heavly fragmented with a bloated registry and windows folder full of waste. because it is 2019 and thats how you should do things in 2019.

I sort of tried to give you the best advice which was to slipstream update packs or use SP4, Manually installing 100s of hotfixes ontop of a fresh install dating back all the way to sp3 is the worst way to update XP. Not olny that but that will result in a 1time thing for you, knowing that updates will be cut off that doesn't provide you with any future proof installation in the future like a fully updated CD, DVD or USB installation source.

More experienced users use/used Nlite or RyanVM, to slipstream service packs, update packs and addons which both software support. Later some people just started slipstreaming unofficial SP4 into XP. You wont find update packs or addons on this site or SP4 at all because this is not that kinda site. Go elsewhere for those things. I personally never used SP4 because I prefer a more Modular approach to making my Install sources but it is a legit way of doing things. Once you have done that then install XP and activate it over the phone. then you can find all the info you need to update XP the the POS ready thread on this forum. This is a very anti piracy site, and they do not even tolerate grey area things. But to your point lots of people have gathered the remaining updates and packages will probably be coming or available. If you want to do it all yourself than you need to download it all yourself and do it yourself. Which is an undertaking for a inexperienced user.

no its probably just paramaters in one of the installer files that explicitly says do not install on win 8. If you can modify that it would go. I haven't really looked at it. But I have modded alot of MSI files with orca before and got them to run on XP or other OS that its not supposed to. But I don't know anything about IE 11 installer.

you can try some of these drivers. I noticed thE gma driver here looks newer https://downloadcenter.intel.com/product/71286

wifi https://www.ath-drivers.eu/download-driver-nr-265-for-atheros-AR9485WB-and-WindowsXP.html

solution is just install the vista ir 7 version on XP. thats if u really play these games but I think very few do.

Ya we haven't been able to install java for a long time. All we can do is install the last version that works then copy pasta the new java in the old java folder and modify the regiestry to point to the new java. This should work until java becomes API incompatible with XP.

ALl haswell and ivybridge GPUs are supported but you will have to modify the driver yourself to make it work if it could work http://downloadmirror.intel.com/22875/eng/WinXP32.zip or https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/22642/Intel-HD-Graphics-Driver-for-Windows-XP-exe-?product=97499 so you would have to mod the IGXP32.inf find a driver that supports baytrail on like win 7 and compare the drivers and copy the strings from one file to the other file or somthing like that. I have heard that its not possible to get GMA 4400 to work but baytrail is not 4400.

xps not going to see more than 3gb ram anyways without a kernel patch, dibya has one hes working on that is supposedly better than the old Chinese 64g one might want to investigate that. maybe message dibya. sounded to me that baytrail was based on ivybridge and the IGP was a stripped down version of that so maybe some modded HD graphics driver from ivy bridge base could be forced to work. From what i read is that it is weak i mean its not very strong anyways, so u need a modded Haswell / Ivy Bridge / BayTrail Driver look here for help https://forums.laptopvideo2go.com/topic/24340-intel-gma-drivers/#entry147393

should be able to recompress it, like if it was on the cd and replace the old one. should ask Dietmar if it even works. or how to make it work.

some kinda modded ACPI sys file here wonder if it helps. Original thread https://www.win-raid.com/t4035f45-Windows-XP-SP-bit-and-modern-PC-parts-22.html

It should run on normal win 8 if it was possible to get it to install.

v11.2.0.1006 https://www.win-raid.com/t957f25-Intel-SoC-Bay-Trail-and-al-1.html

usb has to be fat32 with MBR and have UEFI bootloader file in there you can only access it from F12 boot menu and it has to be in before u turn it on... You might not be able to use legacy mode even tho its a option because its dell. You might also have to install a grub boot loader to facilitate booting to XP from UEFI etc. unless u are going to dual boot like win 7 and xp and installed 7 1st. try BOOTICE

run unofficial scripts in clamav and detection rates improve a lot. https://sanesecurity.com/usage/windows-scripts/ Btw when ur AV has a FP rate like MSE it makes it look better than it is. the FP rate of MSE is like one of the highest FPs in the industry.

MSE is not much of a loss. It is/was possible to try to get a virus intentionally and have MSE fail. This had been documented on sites that compared it to other virus scanners and it showed to be weak. To be 100% honest I do not know how to actually get a virus aside from downloading sketchy cracks off the darkweb and trying to install pirated software that had been infected, I don't know how you can actually get a virus on XP. I suppose there is a threat of opening email attachments and getting a virus, but honestly you should know better to do that if you are so worried about it in the 1st place. Moving forward Clam Win is going to be the best option for XP.

10g Ethernet is an old standard at this point,and its been out for like 10 years even though it has became affordable now to make it more available. So there is hardware and drivers that support that for XP You can already boot XP from NVME but you need specific NVME that has its own bios like scsi.

IF you want the most updated WMP its been here for a long time, No need to manually patch things. https://msfn.org/board/topic/89934-98mp10-wmp10-xp-xp-sp3-killer-replacements/ with good direct show filters you should be able to play most things.

Legit future for viewing youtube on 98 is for them to be opened in VLC, however this comes with its own headaches, possibly somthing like this but it needs alot more development.

they say win 2k drivers but they might work on xp PRO1000-v2 folder http://www.mediafire.com/file/033zeq5l06w30bk/BWC_PRO2Kv3.zip/file Anyways from what I understand it is hit and miss, and it's not going to work on all motherboards and it maybe more chipset related for it to be working than the NIC. What i mean is it maybe not work how it is implemented on one chipset like a x99 or somthing else but work fine on a z370 also might depend if a bios has legacy support vs one that doesn't

I believe Windows 2000 Advanced Server edition can use more than 2 cpus. which is still windows 2000.

The best way to update 98se is to use the unofficial SP3 which is English only. I personally wouldn't bother with 95. The only advantage 95 has over 98se is the 95 explorer shell without IE integration. Considering you can use 98lite to shell swap 98se to use the 95 shell than if that is what you wanted to do than there is basically zero sane reason to use 95. Same for windows ME but because there exists a program called 98se2ME you can use all the features of windows ME, without compromising the DOS implementation in 95 or 98 thus makes zero reason to use ME. A person may disagree with me on these points but only from a reason that is irrelevant. I don't know about NT, I could be wrong about it but there was never that huge of a community behind it like 98se, 2000, or XP those 3 are the major windows releases that matter imo.

getting a virus or a spyware should be the least of worrys for a person still running XP. Your worrys should be more like can I even get a virus becasue my OS is so old it wont run on my system,