I would be willing to argue this one... most companies are using 2000 or XP, and we all know companies make up the majority of PCs What are you basing this one? Windows XP is more stable, that's for sure, and if you are argueing this one then you may not have installed it properly. OK, so you pay (at most) $200 for an OS that runs your PC for 5 years... you don't think that's worth it? My computer runs my life. I paid $1400 for my bed because it determines my whole day... I see my computer as the same. Connect to a domain? No Remote Desktop? No A WHOLE list of things... Buy a legal copy... You're insane. You should have a virus scanner on any Windows OS That's why Windows XP is more stable? i wasen't talking about companies i was meaning home users. you can run windows 98 very well just you need to tweak it to get a bit close to xp xp costs 500 bucks where i live and i never make more than 200 bucks a month,my bed is free,rent is not free,my pc runs my life too. i wasen't meaning that,i meant for software related not those kind of features. i already knew that,product activation is a pain and 98 doesen't have it well i've never been hit by viruses so 98 don't need it unles u get hit with viruses,the nt oses need antivirus No,XP is based on the NT kernel and 98 is based on the dos kernel,it has been out longer than xp has. sides i know of some businesses that run 98,they could run xp but whats the point if 98 is working fine for them,they don't always need the newest and greatest thing if something a bit older will do just fine.