Jump to content

tim_horton

Member
  • Content Count

    99
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Donations

    $0.00 

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About tim_horton

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. good answer i dont want a xp vs 98se war just honest reasons u still run 98se.thx u
  2. id be interested in similar ived used qualystem to make a image but its a rescue disk 4 current hardrive not really tranferrable to other pcs with diff hardware.i need a diskless image cd that utodetects hardware.
  3. back in the beta days of 98 the diehard 95 users argued that 98 was only a cosmedic change not worth the upgrade and 98se users argued me was likewise then the same applied to 2000 and xp when clearly ever new os advanced the last which means they get better .u peeps fight over a dead point windows xp is vastly superior to its preacessor and cant be topped until the next os-longhorn but the fact that 98se is still widely used and somewhat adequite even in todays pc use .im aware that 98se is used alot in new emerging markets third world and xp starter was oftered to allow newbies a look into x
  4. anytime im asked to install windows 4 a friend family if its a lowend pc i opt 4 98se and u know there more than happy with it.
  5. after 7 years why arent u using xp?i want to know why u still use 98se .is it all you need,cost factor ,u hate change etc etc .be honest ...
  6. the thread was never intented to be a 98 verus xp debate but simply someone stating after 7 years how come or why do u still use 98 when xp is much better. i dont think it was a question of xps fame but a curiousity of a xp user why people run a so called dinosaur os.and the 98se users defend their os because it provides all their needs and dont feel the need to upgrade perhaps their comforable with 98 and change is not always better .why argue over which is better xp like longhorn is better hands down like 95 is better than 3.1 and so on .its almost as if 98se is the start of better oses the
  7. i dont like the idea of needing to upgrade hardware to use longhorn when will it ever end **** u bill but like the guy above the anti spyware and ie 7 looks promising but at what cost the average ham &egger still harping bout xp costing coin .it worth a look if your a guy thats on top of latest tech stuff perhaps the reviews after the final release will shed light on this remember when xp was in beta the diehard 98se folks panned it say it was fluff will it wasnt xp proved 2 be a great os but time will tell i only feel bad that folk with no cash cant incorparate any of the anti spyware or
  8. i couldnt get badtoys 3d a old 1996 game to work with joypad then i installed this usb2.0 and it worked amazing. so i cant say u dont need it and sp2.03 is enuff but i like it all the merrier.. 98se 4ever .chow
  9. indeed khan i believe the average home user not power user which is a whole new animal only uses a pc to surf email and message friend the osscational yahoo games room or chat hell i can do that on a P1-166mhz .true gamer need the latest video cards ddr ram etc etc to keep pace with todays games but joe average doesnt.sometimes im on xp pro other times 98se and when im surfing etc makes no diff to me no really difference. so if your happy using 98se and just wantta keep sp up 2 date etc i say go 4 it i cant tell anyone to use xp because its better or theyll be less a man 2 use 98 if i didnt lu
  10. cool do i win a free msfn tshirt and coffee mug lol
  11. lol youve be sursprize at how many old timers still use win 3.1 not thats decatation
×
×
  • Create New...