Leaderboard

I agree with that. You can still surf well with New Moon 28 (and Serpent too). And I can confidently do without the overloaded, newfangled and resource-hungry pages in the UXP browsers.

How's FPS in games? That driver branch is 4 years old. Why no ray tracing, no Physx?

Do you use dev. versions from git?

One country, which we are here forbidden to even breath towards, not to mention calling its name in relation to anything non-positive, is heavily invested in AdGuard. All engineers, the majority of AdGuard developers and other employees work from that country, but registered in Cyprus. Would you wonder why? It's to avoid any possible sanctions, complications, continue to roam free and spread in the West without consequences. They *of course* don't host their lists on servers in that country, they host on Cloudflare, and you're blocked by Cloudflare, not AdGuard. Why would AdGuard compromise their state mission? Your Cloudflare block was already explained to you, I think by Saxon. You told us you get "Are you a human?" on Cloudflare sites. So, your IP is in a bad list. I'm not getting any restrictions by Cloudflare, all is updated fine.

Works fine here. AdGuard lists have been updated successfully just now by uBlock Origin Legacy 1.16.4.35 in New Moon 28. So, I can't confirm your observation.

I just stated facts. I do not make it look anything. But you didn't mention in your previous posts which version of AdNauseam you was using, what advantages this extension might have over uBO that prompted you to install it and which UXP browser you was actually talking about. And any Chrome/Chromium experiences and CRX extensions are indeed offtopic here and misleading. No more, no less.

Supported with Vista, I have the dreaded green padlock, so?

Like Dave and me, you shouldn't be seeing the "human" verification at all, it most likely means they don't appreciate your IP. You and I, we have different errors shown.

So they are right about the browser being at fault. I get this error only with 360chrome and Supermium.

@j7n Yes, try my fixed from daniel.

Size isn't the best measurement, FPS and benchmarks are. They could've just used another compression method when porting drivers originally written for Win10. Do you understand, there were no drivers specifically written for Vista/7 in ages. All they could do for us, e-waste peasants, at best, at their bench, just hack 'em so they will somehow work on older OS.

Absolutely right! If you would ever need one, I can suggest 4.5 as the highest, not 4.5.1. 4.5 didn't show that much slowness on my 2009 PC.

I specifically wrote about Intel and their employees, for them it's e-waste. It seems you get a bit agitated when it comes to not fully read/understood posts. Again, my PC is way older than yours. I bought it in 2009. For Intel, those two, yours and mine, are e-waste. They won't work and test drivers for our e-waste computers because they aren't paid to do so. Better?

the wimboot function is a wimb legacy, some sort of a collector (vhd) of pointers to a base wim file working simultaneously, as all vhd content practically points to it. the innovation of this latest mode u mentioned has the wim file in its own "belly" system volume information, if u wish. but exactly on the same wavelength as urs in the post aboe, even further strain would be placed on the cpu, at the cost of time as well. because it is much quicker in full-vhd mode. as for the os legacy, my friend virgus would pretty much sympathize with u, as he dows some stuff that needs windows vista, xp and 7. me, I am fine with 10 and 11, so my experience with legacy is mostly confined to whatever he tells me. only 1 thing I do requires 7 and I remember installing an ad hoc vhd a couple of times, but it would just take minutes - not a big deal. Your specific case, I remember virgus mentioning it too some weeks ago.

New versions after 4.6.2, or even after 4.5, will slow down a dated PC to a crawl. Did you see the amount of files Net 4.7.2 installs? P.S. More importantly, serious software doesn't need it. I wonder why nVidia doesn't need it, and Intel does, what for? Just to show their primitive/simplistic and ugly UI?

I don't trust any those "new" on-the-bench-hacked Win10 drivers will bring more FPS to an old OS and/or 12-15 years old Vista/XP chipsets. Do you honestly believe Intel employees do real world testing on that e-waste? P.S. I even doubt they have something from over 3-4 years old at their testing lab.

The driver is actually version 10.18.10.5161. It works on Win 7, but SHA-2, KB4490628 and KB4474419-v3 updates are required.

Use Root Certificate Updater for Windows 7 and higher : https://github.com/asheroto/Root-Certificate-Updater Also, do you have a fully updated Windows 7? Do you have the SHA-2 Patch installed? LINK Maybe you are missing that or the driver doesn't have have a valid SHA-2 certificate.

D.Draker always knows what he tells. It's official, per the developer. But the question is, why won't they just redirect you to another CDN, as they claim they do.

Means the home IP is clean. P.S. D.Draker always knows what he tells. He has an astonishing military education, was raised in the best French traditions.

Many, many games introduce artificial requirements to run on an OS made in 2018 and up. So it's not only the question of hardware. And with old hardware, you're limited to very dated drivers.

I remember not long ago the normal speed was about 1400 kB/s, it's through a download manager, not browser.

I have a non-modified, original Ti Bios issued only to the press-release and installed only on developer' samples. It has no artificial throttling introduced to the public versions. They usually do it to avoid en masse RMA. I can share.

Restart & Purge v2.0 - A custom button for restarting the browser and, if necessary, purging the startup cache, created by AstroSkipper Due to some abnormalities I observed when using my Restart & Purge custom button, I have now updated it to the version 2.0. I have changed and reworked the code considerably, and after a lot of testing, this updated custom button now works perfectly. One of the changes is that this new version of Restart & Purge now calls up the native restart code from the browser inside. The old version wasn't bad though, but the new one is definitely better and more compatible. I think there should no longer be any problems that could have occurred in very rare cases. Restart buttons are available in abundance and are nothing special. However, the most interesting feature of this custom button is the ability to purge the startup cache and restart the browser with one click. There are no corresponding extensions or functions with which the startup cache can be quickly deleted in the UXP browsers. In New Moon 28 not even the command line option -purgecaches works. So, an alternative way to delete the startup cache would therefore only be manually via the Windows Explorer or a file manager. My Restart & Purge v2.0 custom button performes a normal restart when left-clicked and additionally purges the startup cache when middle-clicked. Here is a small screenshot of my custom button Restart & Purge v2.0 and its tooltip taken from New Moon 28: As the code of Restart & Purge v2.0 has to be initialised, you won't find it in the tab "Code" but in the tab "Initialization code" of this custom button. Here is a screenshot of its code: And here is the download link: https://www.mediafire.com/file/1myts3tqkr6lgrv/Restart_%26_Purge_v2.0_10-12-24.xml/file The download link contains an XML backup file of the Restart & Purge v2.0 custom button as the problem with the conversion of custom buttons into XML format has been finally solved by me. Simply open the XML file in the browser and click onto the install button! For the installation of this button, the extension Custom Buttons is required which you can get from this post: https://msfn.org/board/topic/183923-extensions-and-custom-buttons-for-uxp-browsers-corrections-modifications-adjustments-and-special-recommendations/?do=findComment&comment=1226328 My custom button Restart & Purge v2.0 can be used with New Moon, Serpent, Firefox,even with the non-UXP browser Mypal 68 and some other browsers. And most probably also with Pale Moon and Basilisk (the call up of the native restart code should be the same as in the other browsers) which I can't test, though. Greetings from Germany, AstroSkipper

There's a well-known American moron whose saying I'll use here in a modified form anyway: Make old code great again!

Yesterday, I found this old button code in my archive. As the code of the button looked promising, I translated it and modified it completely. I changed the tooltip, totally reworked the menu of the important about: pages and added a help menu. I created a version for New Moon/Pale Moon and a version for Serpent/Basilisk/Firefox as some about: pages are different in these browsers. This button has a special feature. When selecting a string or copying a string to the clipboard, a middle-click onto the toolvar button opens it in the about:config page. All in all, it's a kind of recycling of old code so that it works again in our browsers. Thus, old code is not always useless and lost. And the code of this button is so universal that it seems to run in all Firefox-based browsers. Anyway! I will also post this forked custom button here very soon.

TBH, I can't say anything about the old Reddit Enhancement Suite as I have never used it.

IP address can be shared. And or used by someone else (namely, "hackers"?), whereas your browser is you browser, period. Guilty, case closed

Another two standalone reasons for this unique dog tag advocating could be: 1 - you're somehow affiliated with the police. 2 - simply don't know how to get rid of it.

That puts hard evidence on you. My mom's a criminal defence lawyer. In the meantime, an empty string may or may not be received due to a technical malfunction - that puts nothing on you. Telling a "unique ID is better" - giving bad advice to people. Enjoy my expensive but free advice. And yes, as I suspected, @Dave-H doesn't get "human" verification, just like me. This tells your location is already marked as "un-secure" by a spammers' database*, which are plenty these days, and the sites use their services to filter out spammers. *along with that MSFN member from Russia, the one we discussed before, with the same error.

So, you prefer to have a unique ID number of the tiny Supermium userbase, or an empty string? Ungoogled userbase isn't huge either.

Legacy extensions and the mighty but underestimated custom buttons for UXP browsers are able to do many things that webextensions are not allowed to do. That's why I love them. I see them as a way of customising the browser to the user's preferences. Their tasks are many and varied, and accessing web content is just one of them, albeit an important one. But they can do much more. And new ones are still being developed. There are so many of them that you can always find something useful that still works. Or you try to bring them back to life. That's why I created this thread.

I used it in the past. But frankly, 7-Zip is for the omni.ja files enough. There is no real need to keep the original compression as far as I could see. Especially when it comes to temporary fixes of the omni.ja file.

Read your statement, and you will see it does not make sense! Intentionally or not. Anyway! I used 7-Zip but in a different way. I opened omni.ja with 7-Zip and copied all files in a subfolder which I named omni. Then I repacked all files with 7-Zip, too. Works great here. So it doesn't matter whether you use WinRAR or 7-Zip. The file cannot simply change location by itself P.S.: Don't forger I am not only a mathematician, but also a philologist! That means I am a friend of the word.

You are looking for the wrong code as it is the already fixed one. And TBH, you can't find anything that is not there yet. You have to look for the still existing, faulty code: browser.webNavigation.stop(nsIWebNavigation.STOP_ALL); It is in the line 2652 of the file tabbrowser.xml in the folder chrome\browser\content\browser\ of Serpent's omni.ja file. Serpent 52 suffers from the same issue as New Moon 28 which will be fixed in the next release. But you can fix it yourself temporarily.

For me, and for most of us in my country, we always bought Fujitsu Siemens and Philips. And will be buying, but the popularity of the DVD format simply decreased, but then again, we shall then buy BD drives, also by Fujitsu Siemens and Philips.

It's rumours, falsehoods spread by dishonest competitors. Philips will never die!

this is nice memory lane i miss Lycos mail, Altavista, HotBot, Homestead, Geocities... man those were fun times

https://neustadt.fr/essays/the-small-web/

Yeah , I agree this cheaper N version maybe the culprit , it doesn't even have mfplat files. But VM is a different story though. Do you have a normal version to test on real hardware and upload the pictures here ? It's no hurry , of course . Thanks .