Leaderboard

Hmmmm, what's an http address leading to a Russian site doing there, in that programme? Curious. It all can be done without third party tools, just saying. No offence, we are just cautious,

2a is for async, bringing major startup boost / responsiveness improvements.

"x86 release is very broken even on 7+, so there is none yet. " https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox/releases/tag/v126.0.2v

No such version exists, they probably (allegedly) only got the old v.115 working on Vista, being of 1,5 years older than the current, I didn't bother myself to check. "About r3dfox is a modern Firefox based web browser for Windows 7." https://github.com/Eclipse-Community/r3dfox

You confuse spelling with typos. On English KB, "i" and "o" are next to each other, you probably don't know that, so I simply hit the wrong letter, I'm a fast typing kind of a guy. I admit I did a typo, sorry. But it's not like when folks don't know the difference between affect and effect, steal and steel, there and their. For you, I'll try to type slower, got that. No need to get personal. My goal is to broaden my flat to the whole floor of 6 flats, it's for now, so I work hard to get the money. You still didn't answer my on-topic question. What happens when you are refused to log in? Captcha?

I've used System Restore on Win7 PC a number of times, too! With no need to reinstall the OS. But the problem was Win7 itself. It lost activation when I inserted a 32GB SD card. Design flaw, simply buggy OS.

Up to Vista system restore was light on HDD, starting Windows 7 - very heavy and bloated, they included tons of files to be copied over without any need. Even some video files! So, probably, the case with the OP. He got fed up with Windows 7's system restore.

I disable system restore, but then again, like someone already wrote, I have mirrored backups on several different HDDs.

I'm not familiar with your experience or any "security" work, where to look for it?

Actually, I am quite good in finding old installers. But one of them I can't find, even via Wayback Machine. It is the offline installer of Comodo Internet Security Premium 10.1. This is the free version of CIS. Does anyone have that file saved on their disk? Or a working download link? The exact version may be 10.1.0.6474 or 10.1.0.6476. The file size is round about 67MB. The original file name was as usual cispremium_only_installer.exe. Online installers for these versions can be found easily but do not work anymore.

Thanks for your suggestion! What do you exactly mean by "it was a little capricious under XP"?

That was the actual call. I need information especially regarding Comodo Antivirus in terms of its definition updates. Does Comodo Antivirus 12.0.0.6818 or another XP-compatible version that I may not yet have on my radar still receive definition updates on a regular base in these days?

It's time to post on topic again.

Although the whole conversation has actually become off-topic, I do not agree with your statement "Only if you don't tweak and optimize!". You can't redesign the whole OS. Tweaking and optimizing has nothing to do with the fact that the basic design of Windows 10, and more worse Windows 11, is crap. And I am not interested in modifying, tweaking and optimizing such crap. End of story.

You will learn that while this is an international forum, it isn't always friendly to all nationalities. Not to be misread. I myself tend to agree with many (not all) of those "unfriendlinesses". Personally, I see it as no different than folks that "Buy American" and don't see the value in a Toyota or Honda or Mercedes or BMW or Audi or the-list-is-endless.

@K4sum1 Here is the same as Skull2 for server 2003 bit32 https://ufile.io/3a7684oj For XP SP2 bit64 I would use skull2 acpi.sys, because for you it is the one, which matches exact your Bsod. By the way, what shows the first of the 3 acpi.sys for bit64, where I cancel out (dirty hack) the Bsod 0xA5 (0x03, ...) itself Dietmar

Technically, I never asked for YOUR assistance. Talking to you seems to always always always lead to "strife" of some sort. "Sorry" You "thrive" in the environment that you yourself try very hard to create. I could easily easily easily find a DOZEN posts on this forum where members have "requested" YOU to STOP talking/replying to them. It never works, of course. You somehow always seem to "step in it" with those DOZEN members (on purpose, I have NO DOUBT). It is what it is. Carry on wayward son!

I download T2 at least once or twice a day and check the code signing date. 😂

OK, evading the question again, as you wish, without the answer - we can't be of any further assistance, sorry.

@K4sum1 I just see, that the acpi BSOD 03 is in acpi.sys bit64 other handled as in acpi.sys bit 32. Here comes now the crazy hacked XP SP2 bit 64 version, where to 100% THIS BSOD never will happen again Dietmar PS: I find also the reason for this Bsod: C0140008 but I cant locate the exact place, where it happens: ValidateArgTypes or CreateField or ObjTypeSizeOf. This is a really evil Bsod. Maybe idea for hack from Skull is better - 0xA5(0x03, ..., C0140008, ...) DSDT code have operation with unexpected type of arguments, partially solved This BSOD probably means some argument has datatype, allowed only in ACPI 2.0 Patch: - _ValidateArgTypes must always return "OK", even on realy wrong types (mov edi, 0xC0140008=>mov edi, 0x00000000 at head of _ValidateArgTypes) https://ufile.io/sepw9iul and the much more nice solution from Skull https://ufile.io/u42mdknr or this one, only modded for ValidateArgTypes https://ufile.io/463tiqvh

Your checking site tells "Requires Chrome >as low as 84< or equivalent". Who's right now? Whatever you may think, they still make a fingerprint, even if we assume Client Hint was not chosen by default in 86 or 94. There's another interesting matter, I wonder of those are blocked in either of these browsers. https://browserleaks.com/rects