Leaderboard

Say goodbye to UA spoofing, sadly. I tried to pass the info on how to spoof some new fingerprinting techniques, including HTTP2 to win32, but seems he doesn't visit MSFN again.

For example, website exploits, websites known malicious or suspicious download files. However, all some months or more ago. It always depends on the user's surfing behaviour. The more risky, the more notifications. Whether they would run under Windows XP, I cannot say as they were immediately blocked by my antimalware programme and deleted after asking me what to do. In my Windows XP installation, almost nothing happens without my permission contrary to more recent Windows OSes or antimalware programmes which are designed to do what the creator decided without involvement of the user or administrator.

If I had used KY back in 2014, around the military invasion into Ukraine with subsequent annexation of Crimea in violation of international law, I also would have immediately ceased to use it on my system(s). But as I already mentioned, KY was never an issue for me due to many well-known reasons.

Dave, be a dear, try to check whether the Client Hints alleged block actually works in this new 124 version. https://browserleaks.com/client-hints It needs to say "API not supported". Many thanks! Have a nice day.

The invasion into Afghanistan had started in 1979. At that time, Eugene Kaspersky was studying at the KGB/FSB academy, the project "Kaspersky" was only in the plans, the software suite "Kaspersky" wasn't even released!

Of course! Various threats and of course also false positives as is the case with all scanners. But better one too many than one too few.

OS? XP64?

This is one the reasons of such browsers' slowness. They write a lot to ones HDD, I replaced that one with WD IDE 5400 250GB and the things were much smoother.

I am not a Russian or associated, so this is of no concern to me. There is good Russian stuff and there is bad Russian stuff, it's your personal decision to choose between good and bad. For me, for example, the Russian https://www.yandex.com is the best search engine for software, even if it couldn't find an instance of my ancient version of Kaspersky.

"1979" was added by you. From the context it is clear that dmiranda did not refer to the Soviet invasion of 1979, but to the American invasion of 2001. Also, in 1979 there could not have been a project "Kaspersky" in the plans in Russia, whatever that means. 1979 was the year CP/M 2.2 came out for 8-bit computers, if I remember right, no 16-bit PCs, no MS-DOS, no viruses. "November [1983]: The term "virus" is re-coined by [the American] Frederick B. Cohen in describing self-replicating computer programs". Before 1983: invented by Americans and popularized in science fiction novels by American writers, but no Russian plans. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_computer_viruses_and_worms

No.

Considering StartAllBack is alternative history genre, it should be possible to pull one from the multiverse.

@Tihiy T2 and SaB 3.7.10 not working anymore on 26244 Insider build Taskbar is not working anymore and the explorer.exe size downs bt 50% from 4mb to 2.4 mb. / RIP Classic Taskbar. Until Tihiy revives it! 🙈

The purpose of doing such work isn't to get back to the original source, but rather to be able to have a copy of the program that can be changed.

I have updated online the signatures of my ancient version of Kaspersky on my Pentium 3 SSE-only laptop and about 30mins later updated online the same ancient version of Kaspersky on an i7 desktop under WinXP. Both computers were updated separately and sequentially from the same router/IP, no problems. With my ancient version of Kaspersky there is no issue updating several computers. You can save the signature updates in a distribution folder and update any number of computers from it. I have no idea whether this would indicate "no spyware". My installed version of Kaspersky is not activated, activation would set an expiration date. A nag window comes up at every program start asking to activate. Just select 'No" and start virus-checking. My ancient version can be updated only once, then the update button is greyed out. A re-install is required for a new signature update.

Hey Folks! Is the a way to have square tabs (like Edge did when they first went Chromium)? I saw a way to do it, but there are weird gaps between the tabs. No hurry at all. Using Supermium on an old Vista Basic Dell Notebook that I keep at my girlfriend's. It's quite nice.

you have to test it in target machine. only some 486 processors have CPUID support. see https://www.prowaretech.com/articles/current/assembly/x86/check-for-cpuid-support#!

One man's opinion. I disagree, however. No non-Western antivirus suggested. Kaspersky seems to be the only good non-Western antivirus, although I haven't tried Dr.Web https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr.Web Kaspersky could be installed on a dedicated virus-checking computer, always off-line except for getting updates. No risk and no WinXP requirement.

The McAfee Anti-Malware Engine 5800 is from August of 2015. Are you really sure that the most recent dat files for updating definitions are still compatible with this old engine? Did you try updating using the most recent dat file? BTW, the McAfee Anti-Malware Engine 5900 from February of 2017 seems to be the last compatible with Windows XP as far as I could read.

No, that can't be it or I would not be able to log in with v94 with client hints disabled.

It appears not. I assume I don't have to do anything to enable it.

There is nothing wrong with a little more security, no matter how experienced you are. But it must not lead to the computer being totally overloaded. My real-time protection is always partially switched on or off as required. Web protection and exploit protection are always activated. My old computer copes very well with this.

An antimalware/antivirus programme which generates more than 1465 registry entries can't be really light on resources, IMHO. What do you actually mean by "light on resources"? What about disk, RAM and CPU load? Any values?

Restaurant

@EliraFriesnan is the winner of this contest.

Already fixed by win32, works for my system. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/686#issuecomment-2184135843

So you don't know whether they applied Client Leaks Fix from the Ungoogled, am I right?

Thanks, but I'm on a 32-bit OS, unfortunately.

People already write about Supermium 124.0.6367.245, but only Supermium 122.0.6261.152 (R6) - "SECURITY PATCH" is available for download. https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/681

Seems to me, could the reason for that slowness. "At start chromium checking HMAC-ed values from Secure Preferences file and registry and actual values. When disable-machine-id just toggled sure HMACs will not match and all related data will be lost." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/645

Looks like for House Flipper 2 Build 14522811, too! Genres: Lifestyle, First-person, 3D

In contrast to the first game, Senua’s Saga: Hellblade II v1.0 Requires Windows 10+ A big let down.

Thus, I have updated my lists in the second and fourth post.

Although I have said that the air is getting very, very thin for anyone who wants to run an antimalware programme with real-time protection on a machine with an SSE only CPU that is still receiving current definition updates, however, common sense should not desert the user of such old computers. I will test whether Panda Free Antivirus will run on computers with a CPU that does not have SSE2 support. Maybe, there are other users who have already gained experience with Panda Free Antivirus on such computers and are willing to share their knowledge.

Here we can observe confirmations from multiple users: "45 seconds to start up Supermium..." https://github.com/win32ss/supermium/issues/358 Like I said, this doesn't happen to me with Ungooggled. For me, it's not 45 seconds, but more like several seconds vs milliseconds in Ungoogled, still very high, especially if we consider the fact Supermium "greets" me with a blank white screen (despite the dark theme currently forced on), and it stays unresponsive for like 7-10 seconds. With extensions it'd be much, much longer.

Yes, but it's with every browser that has video acceleration switched on, not only Supermium. It's the joy I wouldn't want to get rid of yet, Like I said, I don't watch videos in browsers, I have a huge Philips TV for that purpose.

Slower startup and heavier HDD usage. First and foremost, I disable everything GPU related, I don't watch videos in browsers.

For starters, even if we leave aside the data collection thingy, it's simply heavier. Ungoogled version has more useful flags for user's convenience, highly customizable. Are you sure you ever tried it?